Skip to main content
Log in

Recent advances in close range photogrammetry for underwater historical archaeology

  • Article
  • Published:
Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until recently close range photogrammetry has been exclusively done with dual or single cameras using a methodology termed stereoscopic photogrammetry. Likewise, it has been the only photogrammetric methodology used underwater. Convergent photogrammetry offers a faster, less expensive and more accurate methodology for the recording of underwater historical sites. The principles common to both forms of photogrammetry are reviewed so the differences stand out more clearly to the reader. Two examples of the application of convergent photogrammetry are presented—a test case conducted in a controlled environment and an actual field problem—so as to make the theory and method more understandable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, P. E., and Jeremy N. Green 1976 Recording Techniques Used During the Excavation of the Batavia. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology and Underwater Exploration 5(2): 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, George F., and Donald M. Rosencrantz 1972 Submersibles in Underwater Search and Photogram-metric Mapping. In Underwater Archaeology—A Nascent Discipline, pp. 271–283. UNESCO, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, John 1986 Underwater Stereo-Photogrammetric Recording: A Pilot Project—Red Bay, Labrador. Association of Preservation Technology 18(1+2):112–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, John A. 1991 CAD-Photogrammetry: A Powerful Documentation Tool. CRM 14(3):4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund, Carl O., and Carl Ingelman-Sundberg 1973 The Excavation of the Jutholmen Wreck, 1970–71. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology and Underwater Exploration 2(2):301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drager, D. L., and Thomas R. Lyons 1985 REMOTE SENSING, Photogrammetry in Archaeology: The Chaco Mapping Project. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Jeremy, P. E. Baker, B. Richards, and D. M. Squire 1971 Simple Underwater Photogrammetric Techniques. Archaeometry 13(2):721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H., and J. Moir 1976 Photographic Survey of the HMS Sapphire. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology and Underwater Exploration 5(4):353–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, Thomas R., and T. E. Avery 1977 REMOTE SENSING: A Handbook for Archeologists and Cultural Resource Managers. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, Rene, R. B. Drewitt, and George L. Cowgill 1973 Urbanization at Teotihuacán, Mexico. Vol. 1, The Teotihuacán Map, Part Two. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, P. H. 1980 Underwater Photography and Television. In Underwater Engineering Surveys, pp. 210–247. Gulf Publishing, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchernia, A. 1977 A Roman Wreck of La Madregue de Giens. Progress in Underwater Science 3(n.s.): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garrison, E.G. Recent advances in close range photogrammetry for underwater historical archaeology. Hist Arch 26, 97–104 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374518

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374518

Navigation