Skip to main content
Log in

Community juvenile arbitration: An alternative in judicial administration

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Congestion in trial courts continues to create a dilemma in judicial administration. In Florida, an effort to address this problem in the juvenile justice system emerged with legislative authorization of community arbitration programs. Implementation came in a joint endeavor of a community and a university to develop a juvenile arbitration program. Assessment of the program in reduction of caseload, cost efficiency, recidivism, reduction of delay prior to hearing, and volunteer participation suggests that community arbitration can be a viable alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bruno, T. Personal communication, October 1, 1982.

  • Bursley, D., Gibson, A. & Gibson, C. The impact of an arbitration program in reducing recidivism of juvenile offenders (unpublished report). Pensacola, Fla.: Community Juvenile Arbitration Advisory Board, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Arbitration Program, Fla. Stat. ch. 39 S 39.3339.337 (1979).

  • Corkran, J. Community juvenile arbitration evaluation study: Operation Involvement Report. Pensacola, Fla.: The University of West Florida, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M. H. Community juvenile arbitration of Escambia County: Operation Involvement Report. Pensacola, Fla.: The University of West Florida, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fremlin, R. H. (Ed.). Modern judicial administration: a selected and annotated bibliography. Battle Creek, Mich.: W. H. Kellogg Foundation, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, E. C. Jr., Gallas, E. C. & Gallas, N. M. Managing the courts. New York, N.Y.: Bobbs-Merill Company, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazell, J. A. State trial courts as bureaucracies: a study in judicial management. New York, N.Y.: Dunellen Publishing Company, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irish, M. & Prothro, J. The politics of American democracy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, S. J. Personal communication, January 2, 1979.

  • Mathis, S. J. Operation involvement newsletter. Pensacola, Fla.: The University of West Florida, April, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, D. C. (Ed.). Court organization and administration: a bibliography. University of California, Berkley, Calf.: Institute of Governmental Studies, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J. R. Community juvenile arbitration and recidivism (unpublished report). Pensacola, Fla.: Community Juvenile Arbitration Advisory Board, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. Juvenile justice systems cost methodology: final report. Tallahassee, Fla.: Bureau of Criminal Justice Assistance, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, W.G., Gilmore, B.C. Community juvenile arbitration: An alternative in judicial administration. AJCJ 8, 105–119 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373802

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373802

Keywords

Navigation