Skip to main content

Unternehmensethik als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre–Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus internationaler Perspektive

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über den Status Quo in der unternehmensethischen Forschung und Lehre im internationalen Bereich. Nach einer kurzen Begriffsklärung werden zunächst Entwicklung und Strukturen des Faches skizziert. Alsdann analysiert der Beitrag bedeutende Forschungsrichtungen des Feldes und beschreibt den Stellenwert von Unternehmensethik in der weltweiten Managementausbildung. Darüber hinaus werden wesentliche Zukunftstrends in der inhaltlichen Entwicklung des Faches aufgezeigt. Der Beitrag schließt mit einigen vergleichenden Bemerkungen über die Bedeutung des Feldes im deutschsprachigen Raum und wagt einen abschließenden Ausblick.

Abstract

This paper attempts at providing an overview over the international debate in business ethics (and related concepts). It addresses some of the labels and concepts of the field internationally before providing an overview over the development of the field and its key structural elements. It then moves on to adumbrate key areas of research and sketches out the current state-of-the-art in the teaching of business ethics. Finally, the paper ventures a foray into key ongoing developments in the field and offers some comments on the current state of affairs in business ethics in the German speaking countries. The remarks close with some comments on the future of business ethics teaching and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Albach, Horst (2005), Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik!, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75. Jg., S. 809–831.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albach, Horst (2007), Unternehmenstheorie und Unternehmensethik, in: Schwalbach, Joachim/ Fandel, Günter (Hrsg.), Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 1/2007, Der Ehrbare Kaufmann: Modernes Leitbild für Unternehmen?, S. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (1992), Critical theory and management studies: An introduction, in: Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (Hrsg.), Critical management studies, London, S. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bacharach, Samuel B. (1989), Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby (2003), The practice of stakeholder colonialism: National interest and colonial discourses in the management of indigenous stakeholders, in: Prasad, A. (Hrsg.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis, New York, S. 255–279.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett, Michael L./ Salomon, Robert M. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, S. 1101–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bass, Bernard M./ Steidlmeier, Paul (1999), Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, S. 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basu, Kunal/ Palazzo, Guido (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility: A process model of sensemaking, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, S. 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharya, C.B./ Sen, Sankar (2003), Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, S. 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Birch, David/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate social responsibility in Asia, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Special Issue, S. 18–149.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boje, David M./ Dennehy, Robert F. (1993), Managing in the postmodern world, Dubuque, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bowen, Howard R (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bowie, Norman E. (1999), Business ethics: A Kantian perspective, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braithwaite, John/ Drahos, Peter (2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brickson, Shelley L. (2007), Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 864–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brief, Arthur P./ Buttram, Robert T./ Dukerich, Janet M. (2000), Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model, in: Turner, Marlene E. (Hrsg.), Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, Michael E./ Trevino, Linda K. (2006), Ethical leadership: A review and future directions, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, Michael E./ Treviño, Linda K./ Harrison, David A. (2005), Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, S. 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell, John L. (2006), Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility, in: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 49, S. 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cannon, Tom (1994), Corporate responsibility, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carroll, Archie B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 34, S. 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carroll, Archie B. (1999), Corporate social responsibility–evolution of a definitional construct, in: Business & Society, Vol. 38, S. 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll, Archie B./ Buchholtz, Ann K. (2006), Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management, 6. Aufl., Mason, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chapple, Wendy/ Moon, Jeremy (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven Country Study of CSR Website Reporting, in: Business and Society, Vol. 44, S. 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clapham, Andrew (2006), Human rights obligations of non-state actors, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, Denis/ Wartick, Steven L (1995), Business and society/business ethics courses, in: Business & Society, Vol. 34, S. 51–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2004), Questioning the Domain of the Business Ethics Curriculum, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2007), Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 2. Aufl., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), Corporations and Citizenship, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.) (2008), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Den Hond, Frank/ De Bakker, Frank G. A. (2007), Deologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. DiMaggio, Paul J./ Powell, Walter W. (1983), The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Donaldson, Lex (1996), For positivist organization theory, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Donaldson, Thomas (2003), Editor’s comments: taking ethics seriously–A mission now more possible, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Donaldson, Thomas/ Dunfee, Thomas W. (1994), Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, S. 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dryzek, John S. (1999), Transnational democracy, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 7, S. 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunfee, Thomas W./ Hess, David (2007), The Kasky-Nike threat to corporate social reporting, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferraro, Fabrizio/ Pfeffer, Jeffrey/ Sutton, Robert I. (2005), Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Freeman, R Edward (1984), Strategic management. A stakeholder approach, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Friedman, Milton (1962), Capitalism and freedom, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Frooman, Jeff (1999), Stakeholder influence strategies, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, S. 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Frynas, Jedrzej George (2005), The false developmental promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: evidence from multinational oil companies, in: International Affairs, Vol. 81, S. 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fung, Archon (2003), Deliberative democracy and international labor standards, in: Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 16, Nr. 1, S. 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gardberg, Naomi A./ Fombrun, Charles J. (2006), Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Garriga, Elisabet/ Melé, Domènec (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, S. 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghoshal, Sumantra (2003), Business schools share the blame for ENRON: Teaching brutal theories leads naturally to management brutality, in: Business Ethics, Vol. 17, S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ghoshal, Sumantra (2005), Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, in: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, S. 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Habisch, Andre/ Jonker, Jan/ Wegner, Martina/ Schmidpeter, René (Hrsg.) (2004), CSR across Europe, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Handy, Charles (2002), What’s a business for?, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hart, Stuart L. (1997), Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, S. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hart, Stuart L. (2005), Capitalism at the crossroads: the unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Haslam, Paul Alexander (2008), The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (Hrsg.), Corporate Social Responsibility–Sage Library in Business and Management, Vol. 3, London, in Druck.

  53. Jawahar, I. M./ McLaughlin, Gary L. (2001), Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, S. 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jones Christensen, Lisa/ Peirce, Ellen/ Hartman, Laura P./ Hoffman, W. Michael/ Carrier, Jamie (2007), Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kinley, David/ Chambers, Rachel (2006), The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of International Law, in: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 6, S. 447–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kobrin, Stephen J. (2001), Sovereignty @bay: globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system, in: Rugman, A. M./ Brewer, Thomas (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of international business, Oxford, S. 181–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  57. Koehn, Daryl (2005), Transforming our Students: Teaching Business Ethics Post Enron, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 15, S. 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2002), Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, S. 234–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kotler, Philip/ Lee, Nancy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Küpper, Hans-Ulrich (2006), Unternehmensethik, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Levy, David (2008), Political contestation in global production networks, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck

  62. Lichtenstein, Nelson (Hrg.) (2006), Wal-Mart. The face of twenty-first century capitalism, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Livesey, Sharon M. (2001), Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria, in: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, S. 58–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lockett, A./ Moon, J./ Visser, W. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, S. 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lopez, Yvette P./ Rechner, Paula L./ Olson-Buchanan, Julie B. (2005), Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 60, S. 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mahoney, John (1990), Teaching business ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA: a comparative study, London; Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2001), People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2003), Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, S. 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Matten, Dirk/ Crane, Andrew (2005), Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.

  72. Messick, David M./ Bazerman, Max H. (1996), Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, S. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Midttun, Atle/ Gautesen, Kristian/ Gjølberg, Maria (2006), The political economy of CSR in Western Europe, in: Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 6, S. 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Mintzberg, Henry (1983), The Case For Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 4, S. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mintzberg, Henry (2004), Managers Not MBAs. A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mintzberg, Henry/ Simons, Robert/ Basu, Kunal (2002), Beyond Selfishness, in: MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, S. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Misangyi, Vilmos F./ Weaver, Gary R./ Elms, Heather (2008), Ending corruption: The interplay between institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.

  78. Moore, Don A./ Tetlock, Philip E./ Tanlu, Lloyd/ Bazerman, Max H. (2006), Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Orlitzky, Mark/ Schmidt, Frank L./ Rynes, Sara L. (2003), Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 24, S. 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Palazzo, Bettina (2000), Interkulturelle Unternehmensethik. Deutsche und Amerikanische Ansätze im Vergleich, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Palazzo, Bettina (2002), U.S.-American and German business ethics: an intercultural comparison, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41, S. 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Palazzo, Guido/ Basu, Kunal (2007), The Ethical Backlash of Corporate Branding, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Palazzo, Guido/ Scherer, Andreas (2006), Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66, S. 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Phillips, Robert (2003), Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Phillips, Robert/ Freeman, R Edward/ Wicks, Andrew C (2003), What stakeholder theory is not, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, 13. Jg., S. 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Popper, Karl Raimund (1959), The logic of scientific discovery, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, M R (2002), The competitve advantage of corporate philanthropy, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, Mark R. (2006), Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, S. 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao (2005), The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao/ Hammond, Allen (2002), Serving the world’s poor, profitably, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Puppim de Oliveira, Jose Antonio/ Vargas, Getulio (2006), Corporate Citizenship in Latin America: New Challenges for Business, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Nr. 21, Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Rossouw, Gedeon (2005), Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Africa, in: Business & Society, Vol. 44, S. 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Rowley, Timothy I./ Moldoveanu, Mihnea (2003), When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ruggie, John Gerard (2004), Reconstituting the public domain - issues, actors, and practices, in: European Journal of International Relations, 10. Jg., S. 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (2007), Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility–business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (Hrsg.) (2008), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Seth, Anju/ Zinkhan, George (1991), Strategy and the research process: A comment, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, S. 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Shrivastava, Paul (1986), Is strategic management ideological?, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 12, S. 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Smith, N. Craig/ Simpson, Sally S./ Huang, Chun-Yao (2007), Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 633–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Solomon, Robert C. (1993), Ethics and excellence, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Sonenshein, Scott (2007), The Role of Construction, Intuition, and Justification in Responding to Ethical Issues at Work: The Sensemaking-Intuition Model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Spar, Debora L./ La Mure, Lane T. (2003), The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business, in: California Management Review, Vol. 45, S. 78–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Sundaram, Anant K./ Inkpen, Andrew C. (2004), The corporate objective revisited, in: Organization Science, Vol. 15, S. 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Teegen, Hildy/ Doh, Jonathan P./ Vachani, Sushil (2004), The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, S. 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Treviño, Linda K. (1986), Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, S. 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Treviño, Linda Klebe/ Weaver, Gary R. (1994), Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4, S. 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Visser, Wayne (2008), CSR in Developing Countries, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford, in Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Visser, Wayne/ Matten, Dirk/ Pohl, Manfred/ Tolhurst, Nick (Hrsg.) (2008), The A-Z of Corporate Social Responsibility - The Complete Reference of Concepts, Codes and Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Visser, Wayne/ McIntosh, Malcolm/ Middleton, Charlotte (Hrsg.) (2006), Corporate citizenship in Africa–Lessons from the past; paths into the future, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Wartick, Steven L/ Cochran, Philip L. (1985), The evolution of the corporate social performance model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, S. 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Weick, Karl E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Windsor, Duane (2008), Educating for Responsible Management, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Wolf, Klaus Dieter (2006), Private actors and the legitimacy of governance beyond the state. Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations, in: Benz, Arthur/ Papadopoulos, Yannis (Hrsg.), Governance and Democracy Comparing National, European and International Experiences, London, S. 200–227.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Wood, Donna J (1991), Corporate social performance revisited, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, S. 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Young, Iris Marion (2004), Responsibility and global labor justice, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, S. 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Matten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matten, D., Palazzo, G. Unternehmensethik als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre–Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus internationaler Perspektive. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 60, 50–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372967

Download citation