Skip to main content
Log in

Zusammenarbeit in innovativen Multi-Team-Projekten: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse

  • Multi-Team-Projekte
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Large-scale projects are often carried out by multiple teams working simultaneously on different subtasks. Such multi-team projects are characterized by strong interdependencies between the teams. Apart from the extensively studied withinteam cooperation, the collaboration between teams seems to be a necessary prerequisite for team success. In this paper, a concept of between-team collaboration is developed and empirically tested in a longitudinal study. The findings demonstrate that both types of interaction have an influence on team success and can be achieved simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Ancona, Deborah G. (1990), Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization, in: Academy of Management Journal, 33. Jg., S. 334–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, Deborah G./ Caldwell, David F. (1992), Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 37. Jg., S. 634–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barczak, Gloria/ Wilemon, David L. (1991), Communication patterns of new product development team leaders, in: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38. Jg., S. 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Shona L./ Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1995), Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions, in: Academy of Management Review, 20. Jg., S. 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Susan G./ Chang, Lei/ Ledford, Gerald E., Jr. (1997), A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived group effectiveness, in: Personnel Psychology, 50. Jg., S. 275–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, Jonathan D./Miller, Robert B. (1994), Statistics for business: Data analysis and modeling.

  • Cusumano, Michael A./Selby, Richard W. (1997), Die Microsoft Methode: Sieben Prinzipien, wie man ein Unternehmen an die Weltspitze bringt.

  • Gemmill, Gary/ Wilemon, David L. (1994), The hidden side of leadership in technical team management, in: Research Technology Management, Vol. 37 (Nov./Dez.), S. 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, Donald/ Moffat, Linda (1997), Authorizing processes changing team autonomy during new product development, in: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14. Jg., S. 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göpfert, Jan (1998), Modulare Produktentwicklung: Zur gemeinsamen Gestaltung von Technik und Organisation.

  • Griffin, Abbie/ Hauser, John R. (1996), Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13. Jg., S. 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. Richard (1987), The design of work teams, in: Lorsch, Jay W. (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational behavior, S. 315–342.

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen (1991), Zur Messung des Innovationserfolgs, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 61. Jg., S. 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högl, Martin/ Gemünden, Hans Georg (2001), Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects — a theoretical concept and empirical evidence, in: Organization Science, 12. Jg., S. 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian/ Giering, Annette (1996), Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte: Ein Leitfaden für die Marketingforschung, in: Marketing — Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 18. Jg., S. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, Karen A. (1997), A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 42. Jg., S. 530–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian, Robert K./ Drazin, Robert/ Glynn, Mary Ann (2000), Creativity and technological learning: The roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects, in: Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17. Jg., S. 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Richard/ Alexander, Jeffrey A./ Jinnett, Kimberly/ Ullman, Esther (1997), Embedded inter-group relations in interdisciplinary teams: Effects on perceptions of level of team integration, in: Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33. Jg., S. 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, Ravindranath/ Grover, Rajiv (1998), From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, in: Journal of Marketing, 62. Jg., S. 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, Edward F. (2000), Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17. Jg., S. 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Ajay/ Jaworski, Bernard J./ Kohli, Ajay K. (1997), Product quality: Impact of interdepartmental interactions, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25. Jg., S. 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, Rudy K./ Souder, William E./ De Meyer, Arnoud/ Deschoolmester, Dirk (1994), R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11. Jg., S. 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, Susan A./Cohen, Susan G./Mohrman, Allan M., Jr. (1995), Designing team-based organizations.

  • Mott, Paul E. (1972), The characteristics of effective organizations.

  • Mowday, Richard T./ Steers, Richard M./ Porter, Lyman W. (1979), The measurement of organizational commitment, in: Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14. Jg., S. 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Reed E. (1989), The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations, in: Academy of Management Journal, 32. Jg., S. 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Mary B./ Pinto, Jeffrey K./ Prescott, John E. (1993), Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation, in: Management Science, 39. Jg., S. 1281–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, Robert W./ Walker, Jr., Orville C. (1987), Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence, in: Journal of Marketing, 51. Jg., S. 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, Karl (1996), 21st-century jet. The making and marketing of the Boeing 777.

  • Sethi, Rajesh (2000), Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28. Jg., S. 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, Dean/ Dann, Valerie/ Wong, Choy (1992), Managing conflict between departments to serve customers, in: Human Relations, 45. Jg., S. 1035–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, James A., Jr./ Callister, Ronda R. (1995), Conflicts and its management, in: Journal of Management, 21. Jg., S. 515–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weinkauf, K., Högl, M. & Gemünden, H.G. Zusammenarbeit in innovativen Multi-Team-Projekten: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 56, 419–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372743

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372743

JEL-Classification

Keywords

Navigation