Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

Benefits of incremental investments in R&D and new business initiatives are strongly future oriented and, therefore, coincide with large uncertainty. Market launch after the embryonic stages only takes place when conditions are favorable and is blown off when circumstances are poor. Such conditional investments lead to the problem of a complex economic evaluation for which the conventional methods of evaluation are inadequate. In this article, the authors elaborate on the options approach as derived from an analogy with financial options on stocks which offers a possible solution to this problem. The article originates in a current research project in the field of multimedia concerning the development of Optical Tape Recording at Philips Electronics. First, it is shown how a given set of numbers can be interpreted differently in an option-type analysis versus a conventional discounted cash flow analysis. All other things being equal, an option valuation adjustment to traditional capital budgeting leads to a fundamentally different conclusion. Second, the link between option valuation and strategy analysis is discussed and elaborated on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Ansoff, Harry (1965), Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Ingolf/ Wrona, Thomas (1996), Der Ressourcenansatz und seine Bedeutung für die Strategische Unternehmensführung, in: ZfbF, 48. Jg., S. 130–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Patrick/ Marsh, Paul/ Wensley, Robin (1989), Must Finance and Strategy Clash?, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, S. 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Fischer/ Scholes, Myron (1973), The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, in: Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, S. 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, Joseph (1972), Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment, Irwin, Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Edward/ Hurry, Dileep (1993), Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental Choice Process, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, S. 760–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Michael/ Schwartz, Eduardo (1985), Evaluating natural resource investments, in: Journal of Business, Vol. 58, S. 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash/ Pindyck, Robert (1994), Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash/ Pindyck, Robert (1995), The option approach to capital investment, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, S. 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gary/ Prahalad, Coimbatore K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William/ Mitchell, Graham (1990), What is your R&D worth?, in: The McKinsey Quarterly, S. 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rester, Carl (1984), Today’s options for tomorrow’s growth, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 62, S. 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laux, Christian (1993), Handlungsspielräume im Leistungsbereich des Unternehmens: Eine Anwendung der Optionspreistheorie, in: ZfbF, 45. Jg., S. 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Marvin/ Montgomery, David B. (1988), First-Mover Advantages, in: Strategie Management Journal, Vol. 9, S. 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lint, Onno/ Pennings, Enrico (1998), R&D as an Option on Market Introduction, in: R&D Management, Vol. 28, S. 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lint, Onno/ Pennings, Enrico (1999), The Option Value of Developing Two Product Standards Simultaneously when the Final Standard is Uncertain, erscheint in: Trigeorgis, Lenos (Hrsg.), Real Options and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch, Christoph/ Huchzermeier, Arnd (1997), Evaluating R&D Projects as Real Options: Why More Flexibility is Not Always Better, INSEAD Working Paper 97/105, Fontainebleau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luehrman, Timothy (1998), Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started on the Numbers, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, S. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert (1976), Option Pricing when Underlying Stock Returns are Discontinuous, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, S. 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert (1998), Applications of Option-Pricing Theory: Twenty-Five Years Later, in: American Economic Review, Vol. 88, S. 323–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond (1989), Adapting to Technology and Competition: A New Industrial Relations System for the 21st Century, in: California Management Review, S. 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry (1994), The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, Rowland/ Kosnik, Thomas (1989), High-tech marketing: concepts, continuity and change, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Stewart (1984), Finance Theory and Financial Strategy, in: Interfaces, Vol. 14, S. 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neus, Werner (1996), Realinvestitionen, Finanzinvestitionen und Anreizverträge, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 66. Jg., S. 1127–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, David/ Paxson, Dean/ Pearson, Allan (1996), Real R&D Options, in: Belcher, A./ Hassard, J/ Prooter, S.J. (Hrsg.), R&D Decisions: Strategy, Policy and Innovations, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nippel, Peter (1995), Die Finanzierung von Realoptionen unter Informationsasymmetrie, in: Kredit und Kapital, S. 122–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, James/ Siegel, Daniel/ Smith, James (1988), Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103, S. 479–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, Enrico/ Lint, Onno (1997), The Option Value of Advanced R&D, in: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 103, S. 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Edward/ Buskirk, Bruce (1992), Technology Life Cycles in Industrial Markets, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 21, S. 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Advantage, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James B. (1978), Strategic Change: Logical Incrementalism, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 20, S. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, Hans C. (1997), Kapitalmarktorientierte Bewertung industrieller F&E-Projekte, Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, Richard/ Cusumano, Michael (1987), Technology Pioneering and Competitive Advantage: The Birth of the VCR Industry, in: California Management Review, Vol. 29, S. 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley/ Reddy, Venkateshwar/ Zwirlein, Thomas (1998), Evaluating Strategic Investments: Complementing Discounted Cash-Flow Analysis with Options Analysis, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 27, S. 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, Rene (1982), Options on the Minimum or the Maximum of Two Risky Assets: Analysis and Applications, in: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 10, S. 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, Lenos (1993), Real Options and Interactions with Financial Flexibility, in: Financial Management, Vol. 22, S. 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, Lenos (1996), Real Options, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rosmalen, Gerard/ Kahlman, Johan/ Put, Paul/ Van Uyen, Cees 0994), A compact optical tape recording system, invited paper, 1994 Topical Meeting on Optical Data Storage, Dana Point, CA, in: Proceedings SPIE, Vol. 2338, S. 8–14.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onno Lint.

Additional information

Diese Forschungsarbeiten wurden von der Technology Foundation (STW) in den Niederlanden unterstützt. Die Autoren mÖchten den Diskussionsteilnehmern von Philips Corporate Research und Philips Corporate Strategy für die fruchtbare Zusammenarbeit während unserer Forschungs- und Beratungstätigkeit, unserem Herausgeber, Prof. Frese, und zwei anonymen Gutachtern für hilfreiche Hinweise danken. Die Autoren tragen die alleinige Verantwortung für die zum Ausdruck gebrachte Meinung und für die Fallbeschreibung. Die in dieser Arbeit vertretenen Ansichten stellen nicht notwendigerweise derzeitige oder frühere Standpunkte von Philips Electronics betreffend Forschung und produktpolitische Entscheidungen dar, und die angegebenen Daten entsprechen aus Geheimhaltungsgründen nicht unbedingt der Wirklichkeit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lint, O., Pennings, E. & Natter, M. Optionsmanagement in F&E: Eine Fallstudie. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 51, 990–1006 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03371607

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03371607

Navigation