Skip to main content
Log in

Competitiveness and yield impact of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in winter and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volunteer oilseed rape is a relevant weed in many crop rotations due to seed persistence and dormancy. With the intro-duction of imidazolinone-tolerant oilseed rape varieties in Europe, herbicide-based control strategies of volunteers in cereals may become ineffective in the future. Experiments were conducted on experimental fields and in outdoor pots in Bingen (Germany) to quantify the effect of oilseed rape volunteers on yield and quality parameters of wheat. To simulate competition, oilseed rape was sown into wheat plots at a range of 2 to 320 plants m−2. Both spring and winter varieties of oilseed rape and wheat were used in the experiments. Crop yield parameter were expressed as the number of heads m−2, net yield as kg ha−1 and hectolitre−1 weight. Wheat moisture content, percentage of dockage, wheat thousand-kernel weight, and crude protein content were determined. Significant negative correlations were detected between the yield parameters heads m−2 and yield on the one hand, and oilseed rape density on the other hand. Moisture content of wheat and percentage of dockage were positively correlated with the volunteer density. No clear correlation was found between volunteer oilseed rape density and thousand-kernel weight, hectolitre weight and crude protein content of wheat. The highest volunteer density of 261 plants m−2 caused a maximum yield loss of 68% in winter wheat. Based on a non-linear regression analysis, a single volunteer oilseed rape plant m−2 is able to cause a yield loss of 0.74 to 1.61% in the field, which corresponds to 26.3 kg ha−1 (spring oilseed rape in spring wheat (SOSR × SW)) and 147.3 kg ha−1 (winter oilseed rape in winter wheat (WOSR×WW)), respectively. However, the introduction of imidazolinone-tolerant oilseed rape varieties will challenge farmers in terms of volunteer management. Control of volunteers is important to reduce yield losses. Accurate, delayed tillage after oilseed rape harvest and control of imidazolinone-tolerant volunteers with herbicides with other modes of action than those grouped into HRAC B will contribute to the successful avoidance and removal of imidazolinone-tolerant volunteers from subsequent crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckie HJ, Seguin-Swartz G, Nair H, Warwick SI & Johnson E, 2004. Multiple herbicide-resistant canola can be controlled by alternative herbicides. Weed Sci 52, 152–157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brain P, Wilson BJ, Wright KJ, Seavers GP & Caseley JC, 1999. Modelling the effect of crop and weed on herbicide efficacy in wheat. Weed Res 39, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer H, Pfenning M & Kehler R, 2011. The Clearfield® production system in oilseed rape — a new herbicide generation in oilseed rape in Europe. Proceedings of the 13th International Rapeseed Congress, Abstract Book. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicher-heit (BVL), 2005. Absatz an Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland — Ergebnisse der Meldung gemäß §19 Pflanzenschutzgesetz. www.bvl.bund.de

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R, 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann Appl Biol 107, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froud-Williams RJ, 2002. Weed competition. In: Naylor REL (Ed.) 2002: Weed Management Handbook. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. 16–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber S, Pekrun C & Claupein W, 2005. Life cycle and potential gene flow of volunteer oilseed rape in different tillage systems. Weed Res 45, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber S & Claupein W, 2008. Emergence and establishment of volunteer oilseed rape in spring and winter crops. J Plant Dis Protect Special Issue XIX, 151–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber S, Bühler A, Möhring J & Claupein W, 2010. Sleepers in the soil — vertical distribution and long-term survival of oilseed rape seeds compared with plastic pellets. Eur J Agron 33, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ & Thomas AG, 2003. Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci 51, 83–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm LG, Plucknett D, Pancho J & Herberger J, 1977. The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim SMR, 2000. Competitive ability of volunteer crops grown as weeds. Pak J Agric Res 16, 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Brain P, Marshall EJP & Caseley JC, 2002. Modelling herbicide dose and weed density effects on crop:weed competition. Weed Res 42, 1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson AN, Acker van RC & Friesen LF, 2006. Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Mani-toba. Weed Sci 54, 873–882.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JG, Mahoney KJ, Sikkema PH & Swanton CJ, 2009. The importance of light quality in crop-weed competition. Weed Res 49, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SG, Acker van RC and Friesen LF, 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci 49, 326–333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan JT, Harker KN & Dew DA, 2008. Effect of density and time of removal of volunteer canola (Brassica rapa L.) on yield loss of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Can J Plant Sci 88, 839–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallutt B, 1995. Zur Wirtschaftlichkeit des Herbizideinsatzes. Getreide 3, 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun C, Lutman PJW & Baeumer K, 1998. Research on Volunteer Rape: a Review. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 2, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun C, 2004. Einfluss der Bodenbearbeitung auf die Überdauerung von Samen und andere pflanzenbauliche Parameter unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Populationsdynamik von Ausfallraps. Cuvillier Verlag Göttingen, Göttingen, 161.

  • Seerey NJ & Shirtliffe SJ, 2010. Commercial generations of Brassica napus cause greater yield loss in Triticum aestivum, than volunteer B. napus generations. Can J Plant Sci 90, 777–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söchting HP, Gummert A & Zwerger P, 2008. Auflaufdynamik und Wachstumsverlauf von Ausfallraps in Winterrapsbeständen. J Plant Dis Protect Special Issue XXI, 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Evans RR, Dahmer ML, Singh BK & Shaner DL, 2005. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Manag Sci 61, 246–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tranel PJ & Wright TR, 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS- inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50, 700–712.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright KJ, Seavers GP, Peters NCB & Marshall MA, 1999. Influence of soil moisture on the competitive ability and seed dormancy of Sinapis arvensis in spring wheat. Weed Res 39, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Krato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krato, C., Petersen, J. Competitiveness and yield impact of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in winter and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Plant Dis Prot 119, 74–82 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356423

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356423

Keywords

Navigation