Skip to main content
Log in

Kontaktdermatitis

Teil II

  • Published:
Der Hautarzt Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barr RM, Brain SC, Camp RD, Cilliers J, Greaves MW, Mallet AI, Misch K (1984) Levels of arachidonic acid and its metabolites in the skin in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 111: 23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brand CK, Hunziker T, Limat A, Braathen LR (1993) Large increase of Langerhans cells in human skin lymph derived from irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 128: 184–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brasch J, Geier J, Henseler T (1995) Evaluation of patch test results by use of the reaction index. An analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 33: 375–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coenraads PJ, Bleumink E, Nater JP (1975) Susceptibility to primary irritants. Age dependance and relation of contact allergic reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1: 177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI (1990) Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulfate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 123: 607–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Groot AC (1994) Patch testing, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A, Berg A, Plinske W (1995) Berufliche Rehabilitation von hauterkrankten Beschäftigten. Dtsch Ärztebl 92: 31–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diepgen TL, Fartasch M (1991) Handekzeme, Beruf und atopische Diathese. In: Schuckmann F, Schooper-Jochum S (eds) Berufskrankheiten — Krebserzeugende Arbeitsstoffe — Biological Monitoring. Gentner, Stuttgart, S 383–387

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eiermann HJ, Larsen W, Maibach HI, Taylor JS (1982) Prospective study of cosmetic reactions: 1977–1980. J Am Acad Dermatol 6: 909–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Enk AH, Angeloni VL, Udey SL (1993) An essential role for Langerhans cellderived IL-1 b in the initiation of primary immune responses in skin. J Immunol 150: 3698–3704

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fartasch M (1995) Human barrier formation and reaction to irritation. In: Elsner P, Maibach HI (eds) Irritant dermatitis. Current problems in dermatology. Karger, Basel, 23, pp 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frosch PJ, Pilz B (1993) Kontaktallergene 1992. In: Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Meurer M (Hrsg) Fortschr der prakt Dermatologie und Venerologie 1992. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 12: 110–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Goh CL (1995) Noneczematous Contact Reactions. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kapsenberg ML, Wierenga EA, Stiekeman FEM, Tiggelmann AMBC, Bos JD (1992) TH1 lymphokine production profiles of Nickel-specific CD41Tlymphocyte clones from Nickel contact allergic and non-allergic individuals. J Invest Dermatol 98: 59–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange-Ionescu S, Pilz B, Geier J, Frosch PJ (1996) Kontaktallergien bei Patienten mit Stauungsdermatitis oder Ekzem der Beine. Dermatosen 44: 14–22

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nickoloff BJ, Turka LA, Mitra RS, Nestle FO (1995) Direct and indirect control of T-cell activation by keratinozytes (Review). J Invest Dermatol 105: 25S–29S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Picker LJ, Kishimoto TK, Smith CW, Warnock RA, Butcher EC (1991) ELAM-1 is an adhesion molecule for skin-homing T cells. Nature 394: 796–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilz B, Frosch PJ (1995) Kontaktallergene 1994. In: Plewig G, Korting HC (Hrsg) Fortschr der prakt Dermatologie und Venerologie. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 7–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Roskos KV, Maibach HI, Guy RH (1989) The effect of ageing on percutaneous absorption in man. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 17: 617–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rustemeyer T, Pilz B, Frosch PJ (1994) Kontaktallergien in medizinischen Berufen. Hautarzt 45: 834–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheper RJ, Van-Dinther-Janssen ACM, Polak L (1985) Specific accumulation of hapten-reactive T cells in contact sensitivity sites. J Immunol 134: 1333–1336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnuch A (1994) Die Verbreitung des Kontaktekzems in der Allgemeinbevölkerung und in verschiedenen Berufen. In: Fuchs E, Schulz KH (Hrsg) Manuale allergologicum. Dustri, Deisenhofen, V, 16.2: 1–42

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schnuch A, Lehmacher W (1992) Epidemiologische Überwachung des Kontaktekzems — Darstellung des Projektes „Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken“ (IVDK) in Anlehnung an die „Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance Systems“ des Center of Disease Control (CDC). Dermatosen 40: 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schnuch A, Geier J (1995) Die häufigsten Kontaktallergene im Jahr 1994. Dermatosen 43: 275–278

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Hoogstraten IMW, Andersen KE, Von Blomberg GME, Boden D, Bruynzeel DP, Burrows D, Camarasa JG, Dooms-Gossens A, Kraal G, Lahti A, Menné T, Rycroft RJG, Shaw S, Todd D, Vreeburg KJJ, Wilkinson JD, Scheper RJ (1991) Reduced frequency of nickel allergy upon oral nickel contact at an early age. Clin Exp Immunol 85: 441–445

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI (1993) The effect of ageing on the barrier function of human skin evaluated by in vivo transepidermal water loss measurement. In: Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (eds) Noninvasive methods for the quantification of skin functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD (1989) Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol 93: 696–699

    Google Scholar 

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Benezra C, Ducombs G, Sell Y, Fousserau J (1985) Plant contact dermatitis. Dekker, Toronto Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot AC, Weyland JM, Nater JP (1984) Unwantend effects of cosmetic and drugs used in dermatology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsner P, Maibach HI (1995) Irritant dermatitis. New clinical and experimental aspects. In: Burg G (ed) Current problems in dermatology. Karger, Basel, p 23

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler HP (1989) Lexikon der Hilfsstoffe für Pharmazie, Kosmetik und angrenzende Gebiete. Cantor, Aulendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ (1985) Hautirritation und empfindliche Haut. Grosse, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM et al. (eds) (1989) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch PJ, Kligman AM (eds) (1993) Noninvasive methods for the quantification of skin functions. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen BM, Brinkmann J, Dohn W (1994) Lexikon der Kontaktallergene. Ecomed, Landsberg/Lech

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson EM, Goldner R (1990) Irritant contact dermatitis. Dekker, New York Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimber I, Maurer Th (1996) Toxicology of contact hypersensitivity. Taylor and Francix, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl M, Klaschka F (1990) Berufsdermatosen. Urban & Schwarzenberg, München Wien Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (eds) (1996) Dermatoxicology, 5th edn. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Menné T, Maibach HJ (1990) Exogeneous dermatoses: environmental dermatitis. CRC, Boca, Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Menné T, Maibach HI (1993) Hand eczema. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ (eds) (1995) Textbook of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanitz HJ, Uter W, Wulfhorst B (eds) (1996) Neue Wege zur Prävention — Paradigma Friseurekzem. Universitätsverlag Rasch, Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Serup J, Jemec GBE (1995) Non invasive methods and the skin.CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrink K, Sorg C, Macher E (1996) Low zone tolerance to contact allergens in mice: a functional role for CD1T helper type 2 cells. J Exp Med 183: 759–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Gewidmet Herrn Prof. Dr. med. Egon Macher (Direktor der Universitäts-Hautklinik Münster 1972 bis 1990) in Würdigung seiner großen Verdienste für die Dermatologie und für die Förderung wissenschaftlicher Tätigkeit an seiner Klinik.

Der IVDK wird gefördert durch die „Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Erforschung und Prävention beruflich und außerberuflich bedingter allergischer Erkrankungen (G.E.P.A. e.V. Göttingen)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frosch, P., Rustemeyer, T. & Schnuch, A. Kontaktdermatitis. Hautarzt 47, 945–961 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355108

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355108

Navigation