Abstract
The American Community Survey (ACS) is created by the Unites States Census Bureau and contains the most recent and detailed information on the population. The U.S. Census Bureau releases Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) ACS files to allow public entities the ability to examine detailed individual-level data. In order to protect the confidentiality of survey participants, the Census only allows individual-level observations to be geographically referenced with Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMAs)—polygons that contain at least 100,000 people. Microdata files offer the unique advantage of creating custom tabulations on the population that are not made available elsewhere. The advantages from using PUMS files are limited by the typology of PUMAs. Our project fills a gap by introducing the reader to how PUMA typology is produced and how it affects research. The specific aim of this project is to highlight the fact that PUMAs can be fragmented—made up of physically non-adjacent/multi-part polygons. This is important because the treatment of fragmented/multi-part polygons as contiguous spatial entities erroneously imposes a false structure of contiguity that challenges theoretical and statistical assumptions in geographically aware research. By providing evidence from three metropolitan areas in Texas (USA) and displaying the degree of polygon discontiguity concentration by state, we outline some of the implications of polygon discontiguity for research and policy. We compliment our descriptive investigation by discussing solutions in closing and by identifying and discussing the three general elements in polygon fragmentation: quantity, distance, and size.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alba, Richard. John Logan, Amy Lutz, and Brian Stults. 2002. “Only English by the Third Generation? Loss and Preservation of the Mother Tongue among the Grandchildren of contemporary Immigrants.” Demography, 36(3):467–484.
Arnott, Richard. 2008. Economic Theory and the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis. Urban Studies, 45; 2179–2202.
Barrios, Thomas, Rebecca Diamond, Guido W. Imbens, and Michal Kolesar. 2010. “Clustering, Spatial Correlations and Randomization Inference.” National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper No. 15760, Issued in February 2010.
Cova TJ, Church RL. 2000. Contiguity constraints for single-region site search problems. Geographical Analysis, 32(4):306–329.
de Berg, Mark, Otfried Cheong, Marc van Dreveld, and Mark Overmars. 2008. Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
ESRI. 1998. Shapefile Technical Description: An ESRI White Paper. California: Redlands.
Fotheringham, A. Steward, Chris Brunsdon, and Martin E. Charlton. 2002. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
Grubesic, Tony H., and Timothy C. Matisziw. 2006. On the Use of ZIP Codes and ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) for the Spatial Analysis of Epidemiological Data. International Journal of Health Geographics, 5(58):1–15.
Jacquez GM. (2004). Current practices in the spatial analysis of cancer: flies in the ointment. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(22):2–22.
Kain, John F. 1968. Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 82(2): 175–197.
Mitchell, Andy. 2005. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 1: Geographic Patterns and Relationships and Zeroing In: Geographic Information Systems at Work in the Community. ESRI Press, US.
Raphael, Steven, and Michael A. Stoll. 2010. Job Sprawl and the Suburbanization of Poverty. Metropolital Policy Program at Brookings, Metropolitan Opportunity Series, March: 1–21.
Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Reamer, Andrew D. 2010. “Surveying for Dollars: The Role of the American Community Survey in the Geographic Distribution of Federal Funds.” Metropolital Policy Program at Brookings, Brookings, July: 1–18.
Saporito, Salvatore, Jana M. Chavers, Laura C. Nixon, Megan R. McQuiddy. 2007. “From here to there: Methods of allocating data between census geography and socially meaningful areas.” Social Science Research, 36:897–920.
Siordia, Carlos, and Farias, R.A. 2013. A Multilevel Analysis on Latino’s Economic Inequality: A Test of the Minority Group Threat Theory. Pp. 65–79 in the Economic Status volume of the Hispanic Population, edited by Richard Verdugo, in-press.
Rivers, Kerri L. 2006. Using Data from the American Community Survey to Strengthen State Policies. The Working Poor Families Project, Policy Brief, Winter.
Tobler, W. 1970, “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region”, Economic Geography, vol.46, p.234–240.
U. S. Census Bureau. 2007. 2007 TIGER/Line Shapefiles. Technical Documentation prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
Wong, David W.S. 1998. “Spatial Patterns of Ethnic Integration in the United States.” Professional Geographer, 50(1):13–30.
Yu, Zhou and Dowell Myers. 2007. “Convergence or Divergence in Los Angeles: Three Distinctive Patterns of Immigrant Residential Assimilation.” Social Science Research, 36:254–285.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Siordia, C., Fox, A. Public Use Microdata Area Fragmentation: Research and Policy Implications of Polygon Discontiguity. Spatial demogr. 1, 41–55 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354886
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354886