Abstract
Several thousand kilometers of West Virginia streams are degraded by acid mine drainage, and the estimates for cleanup range in the billions of dollars (US$). This article demonstrates the use of a nonmarket valuation technique, benefit transfer, to estimate the benefits of restoring an impaired region of the Cheat River Watershed in West Virginia. Second, we compare two benefit transfer tools that can be used for making decisions about restoration under constrained budgets. We find the annual value of remediation in a two-county region to be between $1.4 and $8.9 million, depending on the estimating model. The results from our research demonstrate the challenges involved in applying benefit transfer to a policy site, as well as the differences in outcome between a simple unit transfer technique and a new preference calibration benefit transfer technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bockstael NE, McConnell KE, Strand IE (1988) Benefits from improvements in Chesapeake Bay water quality. Environmental Protection Agency Cooperative Agreement CR-811043-01-0
Bockstael NE, McConnell KE, Strand IE (1989) Measuring the benefits of improvements in water quality: the Chesapeake Bay program. Marine Resource Economics 6:1–18
Carson RT, Mitchell RC (1993) The value of clean water: the public’s willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water. Water Resources Research 29:2445–2454
Chalkley ME, Lakshmanan VI, Conard BR, Wheeland KG (1989) Tailings and effluent management, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tailings and Effluent Management, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 20–24 August
Cherry DS, Currie RJ, Soucek DJ, Latimer HA, Trent GC (2000) An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges. Environmental Pollution 111:377–388
Clark M(2005) Future directions for environmental economics research support: EPA’s environmental economics research strategy. In: AERA Newsletter, a publication of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 24:20–24
Collins AR, Rosenberger R, Fletcher J (2005) Economic valuation of stream restoration. Water Resources Research 41, W02017, DOI10.1029/2004WR003353
Dean Runyan Associates (2005) Economic impact of travel on West Virginia. West Virginia Division of Tourism, South Charleston, WV
Delavan W, Epp D (2001) Benefits transfer: the case of nitrate contamination in Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Maine. In: Bergstrom JC, Boyle KJ, Poe GL (eds) The economic value of water quality. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
DeNicola DM, Stapleton MG (2002) Impact of acid mine drainage on benthic communities in streams: the relative roles of substratum vs. aqueous effects. Environmental Pollution 119: 303–315
Desvousges WH, Johnson FR, Banzhaf HS (1998) Environmental policy analysis with limited information: principles and applications of the transfer method. Edward Elger, Cheltenham, UK
Englin J, Lambert D, Shaw WD (1997) A structural equations approach to modeling consumptive recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33:33–43
Farber S, Griner B (2000) Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis. Ecological Economics 34:63–76
Fialka JJ (2003) Perilous pits. Wall Street Journal, June 4
Frisch R (1959) A complete scheme for computing all direct and cross demand elasticities in a model with many sectors. Econometrica 27:177–796
Hansen E, Christ M, Fletcher J, Petty J, Ziemkiewicz P, Herd R (2004) The potential for water quality trading to help implement the cheat watershed acid mine drainage total maximum daily load in West Virginia. Morgantown, WV: Downstream Strategies
Kirchhoff S, Colby BG, LaFrance JT (1997) Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: an empirical inquiry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33:75–93
Krupnick A (1988) Reducing bay nutrients: an economic perspective. Maryland Law Review 47:453–480
Leggett CG, Bockstael NE (2000) Evidence of the effects of water quality on residential land prices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39:121–144
Loomis JB (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research 28:701–705
Lovell S, Newbold S, Owens N, Wyatt TJ (2004) How academic economists can improve benefits transfer at EPA. In: AERE Newsletter, a publication of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 24:25–28
Morgan C, Owens N (2001) Benefits of water quality policies: the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Economics 39:271–284
Morgenstern RD (ed) (1997) Economic analysis at EPA: assessing regulatory impact. Resources for the Future, Washington DC
Office of Surface Mining (OSM) (2000) Final report on the contingency costs for long term treatment of minedrainage. Tetra Tech, Fairfax, VA.
Pavlick M, Hansen E, Christ M (2005) Watershed based plan for the lower Cheat River watershed: from River Mile 43 at Rowlesburg, WV, to the West Virginia/Pennsylvania border, including all tributaries. Downstream Strategies, Morgantown, WV
Poe GL, Boyle KJ, Bergstrom JC (2001) A preliminary meta analysis of contingent values for ground water quality revisited. In: Bergstrom JC, Boyle KJ, Poe GL (eds) The economic value of water quality. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
Quigley JM (1982) November budget constraints and consumer demand: an application to public programs for residential housing. Journal of Urban Economics 12:177–201
Rich PR, Moffitt LJ (1982) Benefits of pollution control on Massachusetts’ Housatonic River: a hedonic pricing approach. Water Resources Bulletin 18:1033–1037
Shifflet DK and Associates (2001) 2000 year end West Virginia overnight leisure travel report. West Virginia Division of Tourism, South Charleston, WV
Smith VK, Desvousges WH (1986) Measuring water quality benefits. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston
Smith VK, Van Houtven GL, Pattanayak S, Bingham TH (2000) Improving the practice of benefit transfer: a preference calibration approach. Interim Final Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency
Smith VK, Van Houtven GL, Pattanayak SK (2002) Benefit transfer via preference calibration: ‘prudential algebra’ for policy. Land Economics 78:132–152
US Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining (1999) 1999 Appalachian award. Blackwater River limestone drum station, West Virginia
US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3 (2001) Metals and pH TMDLs for the Cheat River watershed, West Virginia. Tetra Tech, Fairfax, VA. Contract # 68-C-99-24
US Environmental Protection Agency (2002a) Mid-Atlantic acidification report. http://www.epa.gov/region3/acidification/. Cited July 2006
US Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Polluted runoff (nonpoint source pollution). Section 319 Success Stories vol.1. http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/Section319I/WV.html. Cited July 2006
US Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Watershed profile. http://cfpub.epa.gov/surf/huc.cfm?huc_code=05020004. Cited May 2005
Vandenberg TP, Poe GL, Powell JR (2001) Assessing the accuracy of benefits transfer: evidence from a multi-site contingent valuation study of ground water quality. In Bergstrom JC, Boyle KJ, Poe GL (eds) The economic value of water quality. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, pp 100–120
Varian H (1992) Microeconomic analysis, 3rd edn. Norton, New York
Vaughan WJ (1981) The water quality ladder. Appendix to Mitchell RC, Carson RT (eds) A contingent valuation of national freshwater benefits. US Environmental Protection Agency, Resources for the Future
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (2004) WV stream assessment. http://www.dep.state.wv.us/Docs/7714_EPA_WV_2004_IR_Category_StreamListings_appr.pdf. Cited May 2005
Williams DR, Samms JI III, Mulkerrin ME (1996) Effects of coal-mine discharges on the quality of the stonycreek river and its tributaries, Somerset and Cambria Counties, Pennsylvania. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 96-4133
Williams DR, Clark ME, Brown JB (1999) Stream and water quality in coal mined areas of the lower Cheat River Basin, West Virginia and Pennsylvania during low-flow conditions, July 1997. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4258
Ziemkiewicz P, Skousen J, Simmons J (2003) Long-term performance of passive acid mine drainage treatment systems. Mine Water and the Environment 22:118–129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Williamson, J.M., Thurston, H.W. & Heberling, M.T. Valuing acid mine drainage remediation in West Virginia: benefit transfer with preference calibration. Environ Econ Policy Stud 8, 271–293 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353961
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353961