Abstract
The study analyzed the economic and environmental consequences of a carbon tax in Thailand using a static general equilibrium model. Various carbon tax rates ranging from US$10/tC to US$40/tC were considered with two alternative revenue recycling schemes: (1) recycling of tax revenue to households through a lump-sum transfer, and (2) using the revenue to finance cuts in the existing income tax. A key finding of the study was that the economic impact of the carbon tax (e.g., reductions in welfare, gross domestic product, gross output) are affected by revenue recycling schemes, but the environmental impact (i.e., reduction in CO2, SO2, and NOx emissions) are almost unaffected. Moreover, at each tax level the cost of the carbon tax (i.e., welfare loss) was less when the tax revenue was used to finance cuts in existing income tax rates than when the revenue is recycled to households through a lump-sum transfer. In addition, the study found that a carbon tax would reduce SO2 emissions in higher proportions than the CO2 emissions in Thailand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aasness J, Bye T, Mysen HT (1996) Welfare effects of emission taxes in Norway. Energy Economics 18:335–346
Armington P (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 16:159–178
Ballard CL, Fullerton D, Shoven JB, Whalley J (1985) General equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Blitzer C, Eckaus R, Lahiri S, Meeraus A (1994) Growth and welfare losses from carbon emission restrictions: a general equilibrium analysis for Egypt. The Energy Journal 14(1):57–81.
Bohringer C, Rutherford TF (1997) Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32:189–203
Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (1996) Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. The American Economic Review 86:985–1000
Boyd R, Krutilla K, Viscust WK (1995) Energy taxation as a policy instrument to reduce CO2 emissions: a net benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:1–24
Capros P, Georgakopoulos T, Van Rogemorter D, Proost S, Schmidt T, Conrad K (1997) European Union: the GEM-E3 general equilibrium model. Economic & Financial Modelling 4:51–160
Department of Energy Development and Promotion (DEDP) (2000) Thailand energy situation 1999. DEDP, Bangkok
Dervis K, De Melo J, Robinson S (1982) General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Dufournaud CM, Quinn JT, Harrington JJ (1994) An applied general equilibrium (AGE) analysis of a policy designed to reduce the household consumption of wood use in the Sudan. Resource and Energy Economics 16:67–90
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) (1998) Demand side management in Thailand 1993-1996. EGAT, Bangkok
Garbaccio RF, Ho MS, Jorgenson DW (1999) Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics 4:493–518
Gottinger HW (1998) Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. Journal of Policy Modeling 20:537–580
Goulder LH (1994) Energy taxes: traditional efficiency effects and environmental implications. In: Poterba JM (ed) Tax policy and the economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Goulder LH (1995a) Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage-ment 29:271–297
Goulder LH (1995b) Environmental taxation and the “double dividend”: a reader’s guide. Interna-tional Tax and Public Finance 2:157–183
Goulder LH, Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Burtraw D (1999) The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics 72:329–360
International Energy Agency (IE A) (2000) CO2 emission from fuel combustion 1971–1998. IE A, Paris
Jemio LC, Jansen K (1993) External finance, growth and adjustment: a computable general equilib-rium model for Thailand. Working paper sub-series on money, finance and development No. 46. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague
Jesdapipat S (2000) Thailand country report. In: Baigini B (ed) Confronting climate change: eco-nomic priorities and climate protection in developing nations. National Environmental Trust, Washington, DC
Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1993) Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilib-rium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics 15:7–25
Lutter R (2000) Developing countries’ greenhouse emissions: uncertainty and implications for participation in the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal 21(4):93–120
Naqvi F (1998) A computable general equilibrium model of energy and equity interactions in Pakistan. Energy Economics 20:347–373
National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) (1991) National income of Thailand 1990. NESDB, Bangkok
National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) (1993) Input-output table of Thailand 1990. NESDB, Bangkok
Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Goulder LH (1999) When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37:52–84
Proost S, van Rogemorter D (1992) Economic effects of a carbon tax with a general equilibrium illustration for Belgium. Energy Economics 14:136–149
Rose A, Lin SM (1995) Regrets or no-regrets–that is the question: is conservation a costless CO2 mitigation strategy. The Energy Journal 16(3):67–87
Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Welsch H (1998) Coal subsidisation and nuclear phase-out in a general equilibrium model for Germany. Energy Economics 20:203–222
Xie J (2000) Environmental policy analysis: an environmental computable general-equilibrium approach for developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling 22:453–489
Zhang ZX (1997) The economics of energy policy in China: implications for global climate change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Timilsina, G.R., Shrestha, R.M. General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand. Environ Econ Policy Stud 5, 179–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353921
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353921