Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand

  • Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study analyzed the economic and environmental consequences of a carbon tax in Thailand using a static general equilibrium model. Various carbon tax rates ranging from US$10/tC to US$40/tC were considered with two alternative revenue recycling schemes: (1) recycling of tax revenue to households through a lump-sum transfer, and (2) using the revenue to finance cuts in the existing income tax. A key finding of the study was that the economic impact of the carbon tax (e.g., reductions in welfare, gross domestic product, gross output) are affected by revenue recycling schemes, but the environmental impact (i.e., reduction in CO2, SO2, and NOx emissions) are almost unaffected. Moreover, at each tax level the cost of the carbon tax (i.e., welfare loss) was less when the tax revenue was used to finance cuts in existing income tax rates than when the revenue is recycled to households through a lump-sum transfer. In addition, the study found that a carbon tax would reduce SO2 emissions in higher proportions than the CO2 emissions in Thailand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aasness J, Bye T, Mysen HT (1996) Welfare effects of emission taxes in Norway. Energy Economics 18:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington P (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers 16:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard CL, Fullerton D, Shoven JB, Whalley J (1985) General equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blitzer C, Eckaus R, Lahiri S, Meeraus A (1994) Growth and welfare losses from carbon emission restrictions: a general equilibrium analysis for Egypt. The Energy Journal 14(1):57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohringer C, Rutherford TF (1997) Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH (1996) Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. The American Economic Review 86:985–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Krutilla K, Viscust WK (1995) Energy taxation as a policy instrument to reduce CO2 emissions: a net benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capros P, Georgakopoulos T, Van Rogemorter D, Proost S, Schmidt T, Conrad K (1997) European Union: the GEM-E3 general equilibrium model. Economic & Financial Modelling 4:51–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy Development and Promotion (DEDP) (2000) Thailand energy situation 1999. DEDP, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis K, De Melo J, Robinson S (1982) General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufournaud CM, Quinn JT, Harrington JJ (1994) An applied general equilibrium (AGE) analysis of a policy designed to reduce the household consumption of wood use in the Sudan. Resource and Energy Economics 16:67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) (1998) Demand side management in Thailand 1993-1996. EGAT, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbaccio RF, Ho MS, Jorgenson DW (1999) Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics 4:493–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger HW (1998) Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. Journal of Policy Modeling 20:537–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH (1994) Energy taxes: traditional efficiency effects and environmental implications. In: Poterba JM (ed) Tax policy and the economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH (1995a) Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage-ment 29:271–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH (1995b) Environmental taxation and the “double dividend”: a reader’s guide. Interna-tional Tax and Public Finance 2:157–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH, Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Burtraw D (1999) The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics 72:329–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IE A) (2000) CO2 emission from fuel combustion 1971–1998. IE A, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemio LC, Jansen K (1993) External finance, growth and adjustment: a computable general equilib-rium model for Thailand. Working paper sub-series on money, finance and development No. 46. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesdapipat S (2000) Thailand country report. In: Baigini B (ed) Confronting climate change: eco-nomic priorities and climate protection in developing nations. National Environmental Trust, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson DW, Wilcoxen PJ (1993) Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilib-rium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics 15:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutter R (2000) Developing countries’ greenhouse emissions: uncertainty and implications for participation in the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal 21(4):93–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi F (1998) A computable general equilibrium model of energy and equity interactions in Pakistan. Energy Economics 20:347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) (1991) National income of Thailand 1990. NESDB, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB) (1993) Input-output table of Thailand 1990. NESDB, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry IWH, Williams RC III, Goulder LH (1999) When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 37:52–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proost S, van Rogemorter D (1992) Economic effects of a carbon tax with a general equilibrium illustration for Belgium. Energy Economics 14:136–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Lin SM (1995) Regrets or no-regrets–that is the question: is conservation a costless CO2 mitigation strategy. The Energy Journal 16(3):67–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (1998) Coal subsidisation and nuclear phase-out in a general equilibrium model for Germany. Energy Economics 20:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie J (2000) Environmental policy analysis: an environmental computable general-equilibrium approach for developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling 22:453–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX (1997) The economics of energy policy in China: implications for global climate change. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Timilsina, G.R., Shrestha, R.M. General equilibrium analysis of economic and environmental effects of carbon tax in a developing country: case of Thailand. Environ Econ Policy Stud 5, 179–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353921

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353921

Key words

Navigation