Abstract
Assessment of older people rarely includes functional domains critical for ensuring optimum outcome of treatment in acute hospital care. We report the development of a new assessment instrument, and illustrate how differences between pre-hospital and hospital admission status can be systematically evaluated using the Minimum Data Set for Acute Care (MDS-AC). Content was developed by literature review and consultation with professionals working in acute areas. Dual independent assessments were conducted on hospital in-patients in 4 countries. Inter-assessor reliability coefficients were calculated for each item. Kappa was calculated for all binary and multi-level nominal variables. Quadratically weighted Kappa was estimated for all ordinal multi-level variables. Where one level of the variable contained 90% or more of the subjects, total observed agreement is reported. Separate reliability estimates were calculated for pre-hospitalization and inpatient items. Subjects hadamean age of 78. Completion of pre-hospitalization and hospital period assessment (combined) required 20 and 30 minutes. Excluding items for which 90% or more of subjects were classified into a single scoring level, average inter-assessor reliability coefficient for the pre-hospital period items was 0.57 and for in hospital 0.58. Overall exact agreement was 83% for pre-hospitalization assessment items, and 79% for the in-hospital items. The reliability achieved in the highly unstable situation of the acute admission phase is sufficient for use in clinical care and research. Differences in pre-hospital and admission status necessary for case-mix adjusted comparison of outcomes were illustrated. Development of a means for systematically comparing changes in older people during the course of illness is of increasing importance when addressing questions of the appropriate and inappropriate use of medical technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Young J., Robinson J., Dickinson E.: Rehabilitation for older people: At risk in the new NHS. BMJ 316: 1108–1109, 1998.
Royal College of Physicians, British Geriatrics Society: Standardised assessment scales for elderly people. Royal College of Physicians of London and the British Geriatrics Society, London, 1992.
Sletvold O., Tilvis R., Jonsson A., Schroll M., Snoedal J., Engedal K., Schultz-Larsen K., Gustafson Y.: Geriatric Work-up in Nordic Countries: The Nordic approach to comprehensive geriatric assessment. Dan. Med. Bull. 43: 350–359, 1996.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: geriatric assessment methods for clinical decision-making. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 36: 342–347, 1988.
US VA-NIA-RWJ: Consensus Panel. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 39: 1S–59S, 1991.
Rubenstein L.Z., Wieland D., Bernabei R. (Guest Eds.): Special Issue on Geriatric Assessment. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 7: 157–260, 1995.
Kellog International Taskforce. Dan. Med. Bull. Special Suppl. 7, 1989.
Wieland D., Rubenstein L.: What do we know about patient targeting in geriatric evaluation and management programmes. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 8: 297–310, 1996.
Morris J.N., Hawes C, Fries B.E., Phillips C.D., Mor V., Katz S., Murphy K., Drugovich M.L., Friedlob A.S.: Designing the National Resident Assessment Instrument. Gerontologist 30: 293–307, 1990.
Morris J.N., Fries B.E., Steel K., Ikegami N., Bernabei R., Carpenter G.I., Gilgen R., Hirdes J.P., Topinkova E.: Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting - Applicability of the MDS-HC. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 45: 1017–1024, 1997.
Hirdes J., Perez E., Curtin-Telegdi N., Prendergast P., Morris J.N., Ikegami N., Fries B.E., Phillips C.: The RAI-MH: Training Manual and Resource Guide Version 1.0. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto, 1999.
Shrout P., Fleiss J.: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull. 86: 420–428, 1979.
Morris J.N., Fries B.E., Morris S.A.: Scaling ADL’s within the MDS. J. Gerontol. 54: M546–M553, 1999.
Morris J.N., Fries B.E., Mehr D.R., Hawes C., Phillips C., Mor V., Lipsitz L.A.: The MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J. Gerontol. 49: 174–182, 1994.
Guggenmoos-Holzmann I.: How reliable are chance-corrected measures of agreement? Stat. Med. 12: 2191–2205, 1993.
Feinstein A., Cicchetti D.: High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43: 543–549, 1990.
Thompson W., Walter S.: A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41: 949–958, 1988.
Covinsky K.E., Palmer R.M., Pine Z.M., Walter L.C., Chren M-M.: Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 48: 164–169, 2000.
Stuck A.E., Siu A.L., Wieland G.D., Adams J., Rubenstein L.Z.: Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 342: 1032–1036, 1993.
Landi F., Gambassi G., Pola R., Tabaccanti S., Cavinato T., Carbonin P.U., Bernabei R.: Impact of integrated home care services on hospital use. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 47: 1430–1434, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carpenter, G.I., Teare, G.F., Steel, K. et al. A new assessment for elders admitted to acute care: Reliabilityofthe MDS-AC. Aging Clin Exp Res 13, 316–330 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353428
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353428