Monash Bioethics Review

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 16–40 | Cite as

How Much Weight Should We Give To Parental Interests In Decisions About Life Support For Newborn Infants?



Life-sustaining treatment is sometimes withdrawn or withheld from critically ill newborn infants with poor prognosis. Guidelines relating to such decisions place emphasis on the best interests of the infant. However, in practice, parental views and parental interests are often taken into consideration.

In this paper I draw on the example of newborn infants with severe muscle weakness (for example spinal muscular atrophy). I provide two arguments that parental interests should be given some weight in decisions about treatment, and that they should be given somewhat more weight in decisions about newborns than for older children. Firstly, the interests of the infant and of parents intersect, and are hard to separate. Parents’ views about treatment may be relevant to an assessment of the infant’s interests, and they may also affect those interests. Secondly, the interests of the infant in her future are relatively reduced by her developmental immaturity. In some situations parents’ welfare interests outweigh those of the infant. However, I argue that this would not justify treatment limitation except in the setting of severe impairment.


Newborn Infant Spinal Muscular Atrophy Monash Bioethic Review Parental Interest Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. An NHS Trust v MB 2006 2 F.L.R. 319.Google Scholar
  2. Baby RB EWHC (Fam) 2009. Comments by Mr Justice McFarlane. Accessed 9 February 2010 Available at:
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn 2007. Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 119: 401–3.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, T., Amann, M. 2010. Defining best interests. Edmonton Journal. Edmonton, Ca. Accessed 1 February 2010. Available at:
  5. Bain, K. J 1998. Children with severe disabilities: Options for residential care. Med J Aust 169: 598–600.Google Scholar
  6. Bermudez, J. L 1996. The moral significance of birth. Ethics 106: 378–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bermudez, J. L. 2001. Nonconceptual self-consciousness and cognitive science. Synthese 129: 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boonin, D. 2002. In Defense of Abortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, M; Arterberry, M; Mash, C. 2004. Long term memory for an emotional interpersonal interaction occurring at 5 months of age. Infancy 6: 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourgeois, J.P. 2001 Synaptogenesis in the neocortex of the newborn: The ultimate frontier for individuation? In Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, edited by C. Nelson and M. Luciana. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brinchmann, B. S 1999. When the home becomes a prison: Living with a severely disabled child. Nursing Ethics 6: 137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. British Medical Association ethics department 2004. Medical Ethics Today: The BMA’s Handbook of Ethics And Law. London: BMJ Books.Google Scholar
  13. Broome, J. 2004. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bush, A; Fraser, J; Jardine, E; Paton, J; Simonds, A; Wallis, C 2005. Respiratory management of the infant with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy. Arch Dis Child 90: 709–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canadian television 2010. Couple sues Montreal Children’s Hospital. CTV Montreal. Montreal, Ca. Accessed 1 February 2010. Available at:
  16. Canadian television company 2010. ‘Couple sues hospital for keeping sick baby alive.’ CTV accessed 27 January 2010. Available at:
  17. Castagna, C. 2010. Baby Isaiah dies in parents arms. Toronto Sun. Toronto. Accessed 15 March 2010. Available at:
  18. Corman, H; Kaestner, R 1992. The effects of child health on marital status and family structure. Demography 29: 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cummins, R 2001. The subjective well-being of people caring for a family member with a severe disability at home: A review. J Intellect Dev Dis 26: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curran, A. L; Sharpies, P. M; White, C; Knapp, M 2001. Time costs of caring for children with severe disabilities compared with caring for children without disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol 43: 529–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dare, T 2009. Parental rights and medical decisions. Paediatric Anaesthesia 19: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dawson, A 2005. The determination of the best interests in relation to childhood immunisation. Bioethics 19: 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Day, E. 2009. Baby RB: Heartbreak in Court 50 as life of a one-year-old hangs in the balance. The Guardian. Accessed 11 November 2009. Available from:
  24. DeGrazia, D 1995. Value theory and the best interests standard. Bioethics 9: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diekema, D. S 2004. Parental refusals of medical treatment: The harm principle as threshold for state intervention. Theor Med Bioeth 25: 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Diekema, D. S; Fost, N 2010. Ashley revisited: a response to the critics. Am J Bioeth 10: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Downie, R. S;, R. S; Randall, F 1997. Parenting and the best interests of minors. J Med Philos 22: 219–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duff, R. S 1981. Counseling families and deciding care of severely defective children: A way of coping with ‘Medical Vietnam’. Pediatrics 67: 315–320.Google Scholar
  29. Feinberg, J. 1984. The Moral Limits of The Criminal Law: Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fost, N 1981 Counseling families who have a child with a severe congenital anomaly. Pediatrics 67: 321–324.Google Scholar
  31. Fost, N 1986. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. Critical Care Clinics 2:145–159.Google Scholar
  32. Gallagher, S 1996. The moral significance of primitive self-consciousness: A response to Bermudez. Ethics 107: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Geevasinga, N; Ryan, M. M 2007. Physician attitudes towards ventilatory support for spinal muscular atrophy type 1 in Australasia. J Paediatr Child Health 43: 790–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. General Medical Council 2006. Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging treatments: good practice in decision-making. London, GMC. Available at:
  35. Glass, J; Bengtson, V; Dunham, C 1986. Attitude similarity in three-generation families: Socialization, status inheritance or reciprocal influence? American Sociological Review 51: 685–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffin, J. 1986. Weil-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  37. Hardart, M. K.; Burns, J. P.; Truog, R. D. 2002. Respiratory support in spinal muscular atrophy type I: A survey of physician practices and attitudes. Pediatrics 110: e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hardart, G. E; Truog, R. D 2003a. Attitudes and preferences of intensivists regarding the role of family interests in medical decision making for incompetent patients. Crit Care Med 31: 1895–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hardart, M. K; Truog, R. D 2003b. Spinal muscular atrophy — type I. Arch Dis Child 88: 848–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrison, H 2008. The offer they can’t refuse: Parents and perinatal treatment decisions. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 13: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hartshorn, K 2003. Reinstatement maintains a memory in human infants for 1(1/2) years. Developmental Psychobiology 42: 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hayne, H 2004. Infant memory development: Implications for childhood amnesia. Dev Rev 24: 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hollander, J. 2008. When the Bough Breaks: A Mother’s Tale. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  44. International Planned Parenthood Federation 2008 Abortion Legislation in Europe (Updated January 2009). Brussels, IPPF European Network. Accessed 18 October 2010. Available at:
  45. Inwald, D 2008. The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: A plea for a family centred approach. Arch Dis Child 93: 248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Janvier, A; Bauer, K. L; Lantos, J. D 2007. Are newborns morally different from older children? Theor Med Bioeth 28: 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Janvier, A; Leblanc, I; Barrington, K. J 2008a. Nobody likes premies: The relative value of patients’ lives. J Perinatol 28: 821–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Janvier, A; Leblanc, I; Barrington, K. J 2008b. The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions. Pediatrics 121: 963–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaposy, C 2007. Can infants have interests in continued life? Theor Med Bioeth 28: 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kipnis, K; Williamson, G. M 1984. Nontreatment decisions for severely compromised newborns. Ethics 95: 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kopelman, L. M; Kopelman, A. E Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: Whose data, which values? Theor Med Bioeth 28: 373–391.Google Scholar
  52. Kuhse, H.; Singer, P. 1985. Should the Baby Live? The Problem of Handicapped Infants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lagercrantz, H; Changeux, J. P 2009. The emergence of human consciousness: From fetal to neonatal life. Pediatric Research 65: 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leonard, B; Brust, J. D; Sapienza, J. J 1992. Financial and time costs to parents of severely disabled children. Public Health Rep 107: 302–312.Google Scholar
  55. Local Government Association 2001. Memorandum submitted by the Local Government Association. Adoption and Children Bill. in Select Committee on Adoption and Children Bill Ed.). Accessed 1 February 2010. Available at:
  56. Martin, G; Clark, R 1982. Distress crying in neonates: Species and peer specificity. Dev Psychol 18: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McMahan, J 1988. Death and the value of life. Ethics 99: 32–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Meltzoff, A. N; Moore, M. K 1977. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science 198: 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Meltzoff, A. N; Moore, M. K 1983. Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development 54: 702–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Meltzoff, A. N; Moore, M. K. 1994. Imitation, memory and the representation of persons. Infant Behav Dev 17: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy, N. A; Christian, B; Caplin, D. A; Young, P. C 2007. The health of caregivers for children with disabilities: caregiver perspectives. Child Care Health Dev 33: 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2006. Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
  64. Olsson, M. B; Hwang, C. P 2001. Depression in mothers and fathers of children with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 45: 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Paris, J. J; Schreiber, M. D 1996. Parental discretion in refusal of treatment for newborns. A real but limited right. Clinics in Perinatology 23: 573–581.Google Scholar
  67. Priest, L. 2010. The two faces of a life or death dilemma. The Globe and Mail. Toronto, Canada. Accessed 2 January 2010. Available at:
  68. Raina, P.; O’Donnell, M.; Rosenbaum, P.; Brehaut, J.; Walter, S. D.; Russell, D.; et al. 2005. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 115: e626–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reichman, N. E; Corman, H; Noonan, K 2004. Effects of child health on parents’ relationship status. Demography 41: 569–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reichman, N. E; Corman, H; Noonan, K 2008. Impact of child disability on the family. Matern Child Health J 12: 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ross, L. F 2007. The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making. Theor Med Bioeth 28: 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2004. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Saving Treatment in Children: A Framework for Practice. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.Google Scholar
  73. Ryan, M. M; Kilham, H; Jacobe, S; Tobin, B; Isaacs, D 2007. Spinal muscular atrophy type 1: Is long-term mechanical ventilation ethical? J Paediatr Child Health 43: 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sakakihara, Y; Kubota, M; Kim, S; Oka, A 2000. Long-term ventilator support in patients with Werdnig-Hoffmann disease. Pediatr Int 42: 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schoeman 1985. Parental discretion and children’s rights: Background and implications for medical decision-making. J Med Philos 10: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Singh, J; Lantos, J; Meadow, W 2004. End-of-life after birth: Death and dying in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 114: 1620–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Strong, C 1984. The neonatologist’s duty to patient and parents. Hastings Cent Rep 14: 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Taddio, A; Goldbach, M; Ipp, M; Stevens, B; Koren, G 1995. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet 345, 291–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. The Current 2010. Montreal couple suing hospital. CBC. Toronto, Canada. Accessed 1 February 2010. Available at:
  81. Thomson, J 1971. A defense of abortion. Philos Public Aff 1: 47–66.Google Scholar
  82. Thyen, U; Kuhlthau, K; Perrin, J. M 1999. Employment, child care, and mental health of mothers caring for children assisted by technology. Pediatrics 103: 1235–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Veatch, R. M 1995. Abandoning informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 25: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Verhagen, A.; Dorscheidt, J.; Engels, B.; Hubben, J.; Sauer, P. 2009. End-of-life decisions in Dutch neonatal intensive care units. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163: 895–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilkinson, D 2006. Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? J Med Ethics 32: 45–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilkinson, D. 2010a. A life worth giving: The threshold for permissible withdrawal of treatment from disabled newborn infants. Am J Bioeth (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  87. Wilkinson, D 2010b. ‘We don’t have a crystal ball’: neonatologists views on prognosis and decision-making in newborn infants with birth asphyxia. Monash Bioethics Review 29(1): 5.1–5.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilkinson, D. J.; Fitzsimons, J. J.; Dargaville, P. A.; Campbell, N. T.; Loughnan, P. M.; McDougall, P. N.; et al. 2006. Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: Changing patterns of end of life care over two decades. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 91: F268–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wyn, N. 2007. Blue Sky July. Bridgend: Seren.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Monash University 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Health CareThe University of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations