Advertisement

Monash Bioethics Review

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp S43–S48 | Cite as

Self-experimentation, ethics and efficacy

  • S. C. Gandevia
Ethics Committee Reflection

Abstract

Much fundamental progress in medicine and, more broadly, in medical sciences has required or benefited from self-experiments. This review provides a definition of self-experiments in which experimenters themselves are subjects for their research, and it considers the logical steps which such experiments require. Lay, medical and scientific communities are often unaware of the contributions and the full range of outcomes from self-experiments. Hence, some implications for ethics committees are explored.

Keywords

Megaloblastic Anaemia Monash Bioethic Review Ethic Committee Supplement Nuremberg Code Treponema Infection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Monash University 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. C. Gandevia
    • 1
  1. 1.Prince of Wales Medical Research InstituteUniversity of New South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations