Skip to main content
Log in

In Defence of Male Circumcision

  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Controversies over the acceptability of male circumcision (MC) are not new to the international bioethical community. I do not expect to add much to the arguments or evidence presented elsewhere, but I want to acknowledge the often-overlooked political element in which the debate is entrenched. In fairness to those sympathetic to the circumcision ban, I will first introduce some supportive arguments to their position. Next, I will show the limits of those critiques, affirming that MC should not be outlawed in any liberal country, but that its permissibility only be evaluated within its medico-ethical dimension without the political charge often associated with the issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirko D. Garasic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garasic, M.D., LUISS University. In Defence of Male Circumcision. Monash Bioethics Review 31, 60–69 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351343

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351343

Keywords

Navigation