Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Australian HREC system sustainable — A rural perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scenario put forward by Dodds accurately reflects the current situation of the Australian HREC system and is difficult to take issue with. Those involved in providing input to HRECs continually confront the issues identified by the author. The increasing responsibility, the need for greater documentation, the increase in the range and complexity of applications, plus the increased ongoing surveillance of projects is placing an increased workload on HRECs. There are also some additional issues of relevance to HRECs operating in a rural environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snell, T. Is the Australian HREC system sustainable — A rural perspective. Monash Bioethics Review 21, S66–S67 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351278

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351278

Keywords

Navigation