Skip to main content
Log in

Cochlear implants, the deaf culture, and ethics

A Study of Disability, Informed Surrogate Consent, and Ethnocide

  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of cochlear implants in born-deaf infants addresses the issues of disability, proxy consent, and potential ethnocide of the Deaf culture. The ethical issues explored in this paper are: 1) the disability versus trait argument of deafness, 2) parents versus Deaf community in proxy consent, 3) justification for surgical intervention in a non-life threatening condition, and 4) justification for ethnocide. Decisions for non-competent individuals should be made to assure the child of an open future, with rights that need to be protected now, so that the child can exercise them later as an adult. Cochlear implants provide the potential of an open future and are morally justified on that basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hladek, G.A. Cochlear implants, the deaf culture, and ethics. Monash Bioethics Review 21, 29–44 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351265

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351265

Keywords

Navigation