Skip to main content
Log in

Complementary medicine, evidence based medicine and informed consent

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I argue that evidence based medicine (EBM) offers a more transparent system of knowledge and medical care than complementary medicine (CM). While an individual’s choice to use CM should be respected, users of this form of medicine, nevertheless, risk loss of autonomy. This loss of autonomy is an outcome of CM’s offering fewer transparent possibilities for informed patient consent In both EBM and CM patients risk physical harm(s) but science gives EBM patients the benefit of being able to factor known side effects into their health care decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gruner, J. Complementary medicine, evidence based medicine and informed consent. Monash Bioethics Review 19, 13–27 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351237

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351237

Keywords

Navigation