Abstract
Background and aims: Slowing of psychomotor speed among older individuals has been shown in numerous studies. However, in most cases these studies were based on small and selected groups of people and, in some cases, the test procedures did not allow separation of decision time and motor components of the overall performance. The purpose of the present study was to analyse in a large, randomly selected population sample the differences in decision and movement times in simple and multiple-choice test conditions. The association of educational background with psychomotor speed was also examined. Methods: Data on psychomotor speed were collected from a representative nation-wide sample of the Finnish population aged 30 years and over (n=7979) with the help of a computerized device in simple and multiple-choice test conditions, with visual stimuli. Background information (education) was collected by a structured interview. Results: Results showed a systematic and significant decline in both decision time and movement time when proceeding from the youngest (30–39-year-olds) to the oldest (80+ yrs) age groups. This decline was more pronounced in the multiple-choice test than in the simple test. In both test conditions, movement times were shorter in men than in women. In the young and middle-aged groups, participants with longer formal education were faster than the less educated subjects. Conclusions: On the basis of the large representative random sample of this study, it may be concluded that decline in psychomotor speed during aging can already be seen at a quite young age. Decline accelerates after the age of about 70. Differences in socio-economic background factors, such as education, may modify the differences observed between younger and older individuals. These results emphasize the need for the separation of decision time and movement time in psychomotor speed tests, when differences between age groups as well as between men and women are analysed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Botwinick J, Storandt M. Speed functions, vocabular ability, and age. Percept Mot Skills 1973; 36: 1123–8.
Grant EA, Storandt M, Botwinick J. Incentive and practice in the psychomotor performance of the elderly. J Gerontol 1978; 33: 413–5.
Hines T. Information feedback, reaction time and error rates in young and old subjects. Exp Aging Res 1979; 5: 207–15.
Era P, Jokela J, Heikkinen E. Reaction and movement times in men of different ages: a population study. Percept Mot Skills 1986; 63: 111–30.
Bugg HM, Zook NA, DeLosh EL, Davalos DB, Davis HP. Age differences in fluid intelligence: contributions of general slowing and frontal decline. Brain Cogn 2006; 62: 9–16.
Spirduso WW. Physical fitness and psychomotor speed: a review. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 850–65.
Der G, Deary IJ. Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychol Aging 2006; 21: 62–73.
Yordanova J, Kolev V, Hohnsbein J, Falkenstein M. Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution eventrelated potentials. Brain 2004; 127: 351–62.
Galton F. Exhibition of instruments (1) for testing perception of differences of tint and (2) for determining reaction time. J Anthropol Institute 1899; 19: 27–9.
Wilkinson RT, Allison S. Age and simple reaction time: decade differences for 5325 subjects. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 1989; 44: P29–35.
Wilkinson RT, Houghton D. Field test of arousal: a portable reaction timer with data storage. Hum Factors 1982; 24: 487–93.
Anstey KJ, Dear K, Christensen H, Jorm AF. Biomarkers, health, lifestyle, and demographic variables as correlates of reaction time performance in early, middle, and late adulthood. Quarter J Exper Psychol 2005; 58A: 5–21
Blaxter M. Sample and data collection. In Cox BD, ed. The Health and Life Style Survey. London, Health Promotion Research Trust, 1987: 1–3.
Lynn R, Ja-Song M. Sex differences in reaction times, decision times, and movement times in British and Korean children. J Genetic Psychol 1993; 154: 209–13.
Era P, Berg S, Schroll M. Psychomotor speed and physical activity in 75-year-old residents in three Nordic localities. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 195–204.
Klarova P, Esposito JG. Sex differences in performance on three novel continuous response tasks. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 49–56.
Aromaa A, Koskinen S (eds). Health and functional capacity in Finland. Baseline results of the Health 2000 health examination survey. Publications of the National Public Health Institute B12/2004, Helsinki, 2004.
Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN User’s Manual, Release 8.0: Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2001.
Pratt J, Welsh T, Dodd M. Growing older does not always mean moving slower: examining aging and the saccadic motor system. J Motor Behav 2006; 38: 373–82.
Era P, Rantanen T. Changes in physical capacity and sensory/ psychomotor functions from 75 to 80 years of age and from 80 to 85 years of age — a longitudinal study. Scand J Soc Med 1997; (Suppl. 53): 25–43.
Metter EJ, Schrager M, Ferrucci L, Talbot LA. Evaluation of movement speed and reaction time as predictors of all-cause mortality in men. J Gerontol Biol Sci 2005; 60A: 840–6.
Shipley BA, Der G, Taylor MD, Deary IJ. Cognition and all-cause mortality across the entire adult age range: Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychosom Med 2006; 68: 17–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Era, P., Sainio, P., Koskinen, S. et al. Psychomotor speed in a random sample of 7979 subjects aged 30 years and over. Aging Clin Exp Res 23, 135–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351077
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351077