Skip to main content
Log in

European collaborative study of luteinizing hormone assay: 1. Epitope specificity of luteinizing hormone monoclonal antibodies and surface mapping of pituitary and urinary luteinizing hormone

  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report describes the results of the first part of the collaborative study organized by a working group sponsored by the Community Bureau of Reference of the European Community Commission. The whole study was designed to understand the causes of discrepancy among LH immunoassay methods. In the parent work, we studied the characteristics of 55 monoclonal antibodies to LH which allowed us to establish a detailed map of the antigenic surface of the hormone. In the present report we used this information to interpret the discrepancy in LH concentrations assayed with 12 different methods in 300 sera from subjects with various clinical conditions. The 55 monoclonal antibodies provided by 11 commercial companies were tested in various experiments: the apparent affinity of the antibodies was, generally but not always, higher for LH presented by a second antibody coated to plastic than for LH directly coated to plastic; 26% of the antibodies recognized the α subunit, 26% the ß subunit and 48% reacted only with the holomolecule (anti-αß); only 28% of the antibodies were strictly specific for LH. Criss-cross experiments allowed us to distinguish 13 antigenic regions on the surface of LH: 6 were located on the α subunit, 3 on the ß subunit and 4 on the holomolecule. The monoclonal antibodies to the αß regions further separated into 12 clusters of reactivity. Accordingly, LH appeared to exhibit at least 21 epitopes. Comparison of the immunoreactivity of various LH preparations indicated that highly purified pituitary LH and immunoaffinity purified urinary LH reacted similarly with the monoclonal antibodies and strongly differed from crude urinary LH. These data indicated that the immunoreactivity of an LH preparation depends mainly upon the degree of purification and not that much upon the origin of the preparation. The epitope specificity of the monoclonal antibodies used in 11 commercially available LH assay kits was also determined: 10 kits used at least one anti-αß monoclonal antibody associated with an anti-ß monoclonal antibody in 7 cases or another anti-αß monoclonal antibody in 3 cases; one kit used an anti-α monoclonal antibody associated with an anti-ß monoclonal antibody. None of the kits were strictly identical with regards to the epitope specificity of the monoclonal antibodies used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costagliola S., Niccoli P., Carayon P. Glycoprotein in hormone isomorphism and assay discrepancy: The paradigm of LH. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 17: 291, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Costagliola S., Niccoli P., Florentino M., Carayon P. European collaborative study of LH assay: 2. Discrepancy among assay kits is related to variation both in standard curve calibration and epitope specificy of kit monoclonal antibodies. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 17: 407, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sergi I., Papandreou M.J., Medri G., Canonne C., Verrier B., Ronin C. Immunoreactive and bioactive isoforms of human thyrotropin. Endocrinology 128: 3259, 1991.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dias J.A. Progress and approaches in mapping the surfaces of human follicle-stimulating hormone: comparison with the other human pituitary glycoprotein hormones. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 3: 24, 1992.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruddon R.W., Krzesicki R.F., Saccuso Beebe J., Loesel L., Perini F., Peters B.P. Conformational intermediates in the production of the combinable form of the ß-subunit of chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology 124: 862, 1989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manberg P.J. Isoelectro focusing profiles of human LH and FSH. Fert. Steril. 48: 342, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ulloa-Aguirre A., Espinoza R., Damian-Matsumura P., Chapel S.C. Immunological and biological potencies of the different molecular species of gonadotropins. Hum. Reprod. 3: 491, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vermès I., Bonte H.A., Sluijs Veer G., Schoemaker J. Interpretations of five monoclonal immunoassays of lutropin and follitropin: effects of normalization with WHO standards. Clin. Chem. 37: 415, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrett P.E. The enigma of standardization for LH and FSH assays. J. Clin. Immunoassay 12: 18, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petterson K., Södetholm J.R.M. Individual differences in lutropin immunoreactivity revealed by monoclonal antibodies. Clin. Chem. 37: 333, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petterson K., Ding Y.Q., Huhtaniemi I. Monoclonal antibody based discrepancy between two-site immunometric tests for lutropin. Clin. Chem. 37: 1745, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work has been performed in tight collaboration with: Akzo, (R. Lequin), Turnhout, Belgium; Behring, (G. Schnorr), Frankfurtam-Main, Germany; Bio-Mérieux, (C. Courte), Marcy l’Etoile, France; Boehringer Mannheim, (H. Brettschneider), Penzberg, Germany, Cis-Bioindustries, (P. Seguin), Bagnols sur Ceze, France; Immunotech, (M. Benkirane), Marseille, France; Kodak Clinical Diagnostics Ltd, (D.J. Montague), Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom; Medgenix Diagnostics, (C Saussez), Fleurus, Belgium; Novo Biolabs (A. Bates), Cambridge, United Kingdom; Pharmacia-Wallac Oy, (K. Petterson), Turku, Finland; Serono, Ardea, Italy; Serono Diagnostics, (R.F. Palmer), Woking, United Kingdom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costagliola, S., Niccoli, P., Florentino, M. et al. European collaborative study of luteinizing hormone assay: 1. Epitope specificity of luteinizing hormone monoclonal antibodies and surface mapping of pituitary and urinary luteinizing hormone. J Endocrinol Invest 17, 397–406 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03347726

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03347726

Key-words

Navigation