Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Business Research
  3. Article

Corporate Social Responsibility in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Is it Beneficial for Top-Tier Suppliers to Market their Capability to Ensure a Responsible Supply Chain?

  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 February 2014
  • volume 6, pages 126–152 (2013)
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Business Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Corporate Social Responsibility in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Is it Beneficial for Top-Tier Suppliers to Market their Capability to Ensure a Responsible Supply Chain?
Download PDF
  • Thomas Leppelt1,
  • Kai Foerstl2 &
  • Evi Hartmann1 

  • 7596 Accesses

  • 24 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Cite this article

Abstract

This study assesses how top-tier suppliers market their capabilities to ensure a responsible upstream supply chain to their downstream buyers, and how the marketing of corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related supply management practices affects the reputation of top-tier suppliers in business-to-business (B2B) markets. In a cross-functional multiple-case study involving marketing, purchasing, and sustainability executives of five supplier organizations in Central Europe, we explored four distinct approaches for marketing superior CSR management abilities in B2B markets that potentially foster long-term comparative advantages: (1) Fact-based communication of measurable CSR capabilities, (2) targeting of indirect customers and influencers, (3) marketing through education, and (4) marketing of CSR as a service. Moreover, our inductive results provide evidence that the effective marketing of CSR capabilities enhances a supplier’s reputation only if it sends consistent signals to the market. Therefore, a close integration of marketing and purchasing is crucial for achieving signaling consistency. Building on an established framework of purchasing-marketing integration in the particular context of CSR we developed a crossfunctional theory on the link between marketing, supply chain alignment and reputation, which is expressed in four sets of testable research propositions.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Adams, Marjorie E., George S. Day, and Deborah Dougherty (1998): Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15 (5): 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, James, Paul Childerhouse, and Denis R. Towill (2003): The Impact of Product Life Cycle on Supply Chain Strategy. International Journal of Production Economics, 85 (2): 127–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaeshi, Kenneth M., Onyeka K. Osuji, and Paul Nnodim (2008): Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains of Global Brands: A Boundaryless Responsibility? Clarifications, Exceptions and Implications, Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (1): 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, Pat, Timothy M. Devinney, Jordan J. Louviere, and Paul F. Burke (2010): The Importance of Social Product Attributes in Consumer Purchasing Decisions: A Multi-Country Comparative Study, International Business Review, 19 (2): 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, John M. T. and Stephen A. Greyser (2006): Corporate Marketing: Integrating Corporate Identity, Corporate Branding, Corporate Communications, Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation, European Journal of Marketing, 40 (7/8): 730–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bone, Paula F. and Robert J. Corey (2000): Packaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers and Ethically Interested Consumers, Journal of Business Ethics, 24 (3): 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Ken K. and Morgan L. Swink (2008): Empirical Elephants: Why Multiple Methods are Essential to Quality Research in Operations and Supply Chain Management, Journal of Operations Management, 26 (3): 338–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickson, Shelley L. (2007): Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value, Academy of Management Review, 32 (3): 864–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L. (2007): Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32 (3): 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, Michal J., Benjamin A. Neville, and Gregory J. Whitwell (2010): Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behavior of Ethically Minded Consumers, Journal of Business Ethics, 97 (1): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B. (1999): Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business & Society, 38 (3): 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Craig R. and P. Liane Easton (2011): Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Evolution and Future Directions, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 41 (1): 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Craig R. and Marianne M. Jennings (2004): The Role of Purchasing in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Analysis, Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (1): 145–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter Craig R. and Dale S. Rogers (2008): A Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38 (5): 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childerhouse, Paul, James Aitken, and Denis R. Towill (2002): Analysis and Design of Focused Demand Chains, Journal of Operations Management, 20 (6): 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Closs, David J., Cheri Speier, and Nathan Meacham (2011): Sustainability to Support End-To-End Value Chains: The Role of Supply Chain Management, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1): 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, Brian L., David J. Ketchen, and Stanley F. Slater (2011): Toward a ‘Theoretical Toolbox’ for Sustainability Research in Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1): 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, Joep P., S. Alexander Haslam, and John M. T. Balmer (2007): Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings, and Products, British Journal of Management, 18 (S1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew (1999): Are you Ethical? Please Tick Yes or No: On Researching Ethics in Business Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics, 20 (3): 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. (1994): The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58 (4): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, Markus and Manfred Schwaiger (2005): Corporate Reputation: Disentangling the Effects on Financial Performance, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7/8): 838–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. and Melissa E. Graebner (2007): Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John (1998): Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21stCentury Business, New Society Pbublishers: Stony Creek, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAZ, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2012): Verseuchte Erdbeeren lösten Brechdurchfall aus, http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/gesundheit/norovirus-erkrankungen-verseuchte-erdbeeren-loesten-brechdurchfall-aus-11919056.html (Access date: 2012-10-19).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Anthony and John Fahy (2004): Towards a Further Understanding of the Development of Market Orientation in the Firm: A Conceptual Framework Based on the Market-Sensing Capability, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 12 (4): 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, Lars E. and Hakan Hakansson (2001): Supply Network Strategies, Wiley: Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, Shankar (1994): Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 58 (2): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, John (2006): Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, Michael, Winfried Ruigrok, and Barbara Wicki (2008): What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study?, Strategic Management Journal, 29 (13): 1465–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Havard, Bendik M. Samuelsen, and Pal R. Silseth (2008): Customer Perceived Value in B-t-B Service Relationships: Investigating the Importance of Corporate Reputation, Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (2): 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Jeffrey S. and R. Edward Freeman (1999): Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5): 479–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart L. (1995): A Natural Resource-Based View of Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, Adrian and Julie Richardson (2004): The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all Add Up?, Earthscan: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Terry (1985): Manufacturing Strategy: The Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Function, Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollos, Daniel, Constantin Blome, and Kai Foerstl (2012): Does Sustainable Supplier Co-Operation Affect Performance? Examining Implications for the Triple Bottom Line, International Journal of Production Research, 50 (11): 2968–2986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Jennifer, Jennifer Nash, and John Ehrenfeld (1999): Industry Codes as Agents of Change: Responsible CARE Adoption by US Chemical Companies, Business Strategy and the Environment, 8 (5): 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. Tomas M. (2011): Market-Focused Sustainability: Market Orientation Plus!, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. (2011): Sustainable Marketing, Equity, and Economic Growth: A Resource-Advantage, Economic Freedom Approach, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husted, Bryan W. and José De Jesus Salazar (2006): Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance, Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janney, Jay J. and Steve Gove (2011): Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal, Journal of Management Studies, 48 (7): 1562–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Peter, Collin Clarke-Hill, Daphne Comfort, and David Hillier (2008): Marketing and Sustainability, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 26 (2): 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, Rajan R. and Jeffrey K. Liker (1994): A Second Look at Japanese Product Development, Harvard Business Review, 72 (6): 154–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourula, Arno (2010): Corporate Engagement with Non-Governmental Organizations in Different Institutional Contexts: A Case Study of a Forest Products Company, Journal of World Business, 45 (4): 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Daniel R., Stephan Vachon, and Robert D. Klassen (2009): Special Topic Forum on Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Introduction and Reflections on the Role of Purchasing Management, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (4): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Douglas M. and Sebastián J. García-Dastugue (2006): Cross-Functional Processes for the Implementation of Service-Dominant Logic, in: Robert F. Lusch and Stephen L. Vargo (eds.): The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate and Directions, Sharpe: Armonk, NY, 150–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hau L., Mitchell M. Tseng, and David Hoyt (2008): Unsafe for children: Mattel’s toy recalls and supply chain management, http://homes.ieu.edu.tr/~mdemirbag/mattel.pdf (Access date: 2013-06-10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Su-Yol and Robert D. Klassen (2008): Drivers and Enablers that Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Smalland Medium-Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains, Production and Operations Management, 17 (6): 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppelt, Thomas, Kai Foerstl, Carsten Reuter, and Evi Hartmann (2011): Sustainability Management beyond Organizational Boundaries: Sustainable Supplier Relationship Management in the Chemical Industry, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.011 (Access date: 2013-06-10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, Andy, Jeremy Moon, and Wayne Visser (2006): Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence, Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1): 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luchs, Michael G., Rebecca W. Naylor, Julie R. Irwin, and Rajagopal Raghunathan (2010): The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference, Journal of Marketing, 74 (5): 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, Robert F. (2011): Reframing Supply Chain Management: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (1): 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, Abagail and Donald S. Siegel (2001): Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, Abagail, Donald S. Siegel, and Patrick M. Wright (2006): Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, Journal of Management Studies, 43 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman (1994): Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monczka, Robert M., Robert J. Trent, and Robert B. Handfield (2005): Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 3rd ed., Thomson: Mason, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, Susan (2002): Branding Importance in Business-to-Business Markets: Three Buyer Clusters, Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (6): 525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndofor, Hermann A. and Edward Levitas (2004): Signaling the Strategic Value of Knowledge, Journal of Management, 30 (5): 685–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, Mark (2004): Understanding the Factors that Enable and Inhibit the Integration of Operations, Purchasing and Logistics, Journal of Operations Management, 22 (5): 459–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, Mark and Zhaohui Wu (2009): Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45 (2): 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Michael Q. (1990): Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed., Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulraj, Antony (2011): Understanding the Relationships between Internal Resources and Capabilities, Sustainable Supply Management and Organizational Sustainability, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (1): 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Chad (1998): Processes of a Case Study Methodology for Postgraduate Research in Marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 32 (9/10): 785–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Hayagreeva (1994): The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations tions in the American Automobile Industry 1895–1912, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (S1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindova, Violina P., Ian O. Williamson, Antoaneta P. Petkova, and Joy M. Sever (2005): Being Good or Being Known: An Empirical Examination of the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Organizational Reputation, Academy of Management Journal, 48 (6): 1033–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr, Tobias, Sachin B. Modi, W. C. Benton, Craig R. Carter, Thomas Y. Choi, Paul D. Larson, Michiel R. Leenders, Vincent A. Mabert, Ram Narasimhan, and Stephan M. Wagner (2012): Research Opportunities in Purchasing and Supply Management, International Journal of Production Research, 50 (16): 4556–4579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schueth, Steve (2003): Socially Responsible Investing in the United States, Journal of Business Ethics, 43 (3): 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, Stefan, and Martin Mueller (2008): From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15): 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N., Arun Sharma, and Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer (2009): Why Integrating Purchasing with Marketing is Both Inevitable and Beneficial, Industrial Marketing Management, 38 (8): 865–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, Paul (1995): The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 936–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova, Maria, Stephan C. Henneberg, Bahar Ashnai, Peter Naudé, and Stefanos Mouzas (2011): Understanding the Role of Marketing-Purchasing Collaboration in Industrial Markets: The Case of Russia, Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (1): 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ted, David A. Sonnenfeld, and David Pellow (2006): Challenging the Chip: Labor Rights and Environmental Justice in the Global Electronics Industry, Temple University Press: Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Laura and Michael Bourlakis (2009): The Evolution from Corporate Social Responsibility to Supply Chain Responsibility: The Case of Waitrose, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14 (4): 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey (1999): Marketing, Business Processes, and Shareholder Value: An Organizationally Embedded View of Marketing Activities and the Discipline of Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue): 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm and Juliet M. Corbin (1998): Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2nd ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Christopher S. (2008): Making Products Safe: Process and Challenges, International Commerce Review, 8 (1): 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, Wendy L., Lisa M. Ellram, and Jon F. Kirchoff (2010): Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: A Thematic Analysis Related to Supply Chain Management, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46 (1): 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder, Rob and Alex van der Zwart (2006): International Business-Society Management: Linking Corporate Responsibility and Globalization, Routledge: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Stephan M., Linda S. Coley, and Eckhard Lindemann (2011): Effect of Suppliers’ Reputation on the Future of Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Mediating Roles of Outcome Fairness and Trust, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47 (2): 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Alvin J., Larry C. Giunipero, and Tony L. Henthorne (1994): The Cross-Functional Imperative: The Case of Marketing and Purchasing, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30 (2): 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Elizabeth J. and Richard P. Vlosky (1997): Partnering Relationship Activities: Building Theory from Case Study Research, Journal of Business Research, 39 (1): 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Julia (2011): Sustainable Supply Chain Management Integration: A Qualitative Analysis of the German Manufacturing Industry, Journal of Business Ethics, 102 (2): 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Zhaohui and Thomas Y. Choi (2005): Supplier-Supplier Relationships in the Buyer-Supplier Triad: Building Theories from Eight Case Studies, Journal of Operations Management, 24 (1): 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynstra, Finn, Fredrik von Corswant, and Martin Wetzels (2010): In Chains? An Empirical Study of Antecedents of Supplier Product Development Activity in the Automotive Industry, Journal of Production and Innovation Management, 27 (5): 625–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Robert K. (2009):Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Supply Chain Management, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

    Thomas Leppelt & Evi Hartmann

  2. Institute for Supply Chain Management, EBS Business School, Germany

    Kai Foerstl

Authors
  1. Thomas Leppelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai Foerstl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evi Hartmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Leppelt.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leppelt, T., Foerstl, K. & Hartmann, E. Corporate Social Responsibility in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Is it Beneficial for Top-Tier Suppliers to Market their Capability to Ensure a Responsible Supply Chain?. Bus Res 6, 126–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342746

Download citation

  • Received: 25 June 2012

  • Accepted: 21 April 2013

  • Published: 28 February 2014

  • Issue Date: November 2013

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342746

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

JEL-classification

  • M14
  • M21
  • M39
  • L60

Keywords

  • business markets
  • case study research
  • corporate social responsibility
  • cross-functional research
  • marketing
  • supply chain management
  • supply management
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature