Vietnamese Australian Gamblers’ Views on Luck and Winning: Universal Versus Culture-specific Schemas

Open Access
Article

Abstract

This article examines Vietnamese Australian gamblers’ views on luck and winning to explore their subjective perspectives. Illusion of control beliefs have been identified as a predictor of gambling frequency and a risk factor for problem gambling. Culture-specific beliefs regarding luck and winning may further strengthen universal illusion of control beliefs. Twenty-one Vietnamese-Australian gamblers were interviewed with regard to their subjective views of luck and winning at gambling. It was hypothesized that regular gamblers would hold substantial illusion of control beliefs, that culture-specific schemas would be present in their beliefs about gambling outcomes, and that universal schemas commonly found in gamblers from other cultural backgrounds would also be present. The results indicated that Vietnamese Australian gamblers held both universal illusion of control beliefs and some culture-specific beliefs. The implications of culture-specific schemas in reinforcing illusion of control beliefs are discussed.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Au, P., & Yu, R. (1997). Working with Chinese problem gamblers: Integrating cultural diversities and treatment theories. In D. F. Jacobs (Moderator & Presenter), Problem gambling among Asians in Canada and the U.S.A.: A new challenge for intervention. Symposium conducted at the 10th International Conference on Gambling and Risk-Taking, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Bovee, S. (1998). Gods and gaming, Part II: Chinese and Native American religions. Paper presented at the 12th National Conference on Problem Gambling, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 119–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play and games. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coventry, K. R. (2002). Rationality and decision making: The case of gambling and the development of gambling addiction. In J. J. Marotta, J. A. Cornelius, & W. R. Eadington (Eds.), The downside: Problem & pathological gambling (pp. 43–68). Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  8. Gmelch, G. (2006). Inside pitch: Life in professional baseball. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs, D. F. (1986). A general theory of addictions: A new theoretical model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 2, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keren, G. (1994). The rationality of gambling: Gamblers’ conceptions of probability, chance and luck. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 485–499). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Langer, E. J. (1975). Illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langer, E. J., & Ross, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynch, R. (1990). Working-class luck and vocabularies of hope among regular poker-machine players. In D. Rowe & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Sport and leisure: Trends in Australian popular culture (pp. 189–208). Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  14. Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science and religion, and other essays. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  15. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1997). Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999a). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999b). The prediction of gambling behavior and problem gambling from attitudes and perceived norms. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore, S., & Ohtsuka, K. (2001). Youth gambling in Melbourne’s west: Changes between 1996 and 1998 for Anglo-European background and Asian background school-based youth. International Gambling Studies, 1, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohtsuka, K., & Chan, C. C. (2010). Donning red underwear to play mahjong: Superstitious beliefs and problem gambling among Chinese mahjong players in Macau. Gambling Research, 22, 18–33.Google Scholar
  20. Papineau, E. (2005). Pathological gambling in Montreal’s Chinese community: An anthropological perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2004). Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1087–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Renard, J. B., & Walker, R. S. (1987). The idea of chance: Attitudes and superstitions. Diogenes, 35, 111–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ridley, C. R., Chih, D. W., & Olivera, R. J. (2000). Training in cultural schemas: An antidote to unintentional racism in clinical practice. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: a two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sloane, W. (2006). Jung and Rhine [letter]. Journal of Parapsychology, 70, 167–171.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, G. J., Volberg, R. A., & Wynne, H. J. (2002). A qualitative study of “at large” problem gamblers. In J. J. Marotta, J. A. Cornelius, & W. R. Eadington (Eds.), The downside: Problem & pathological gambling (pp. 43–68). Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  28. Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority. (1997). Patron profile of a major casino operating in a metropolitan environment. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority. (2000). The impact of gaming on specific cultural groups. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Walker, M. B. (1992). The psychology of gambling. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  31. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Keis Ohtsuka, Thai Ohtsuka;licensee Springer 2010

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Integrated Life ServicesMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations