Skip to main content
Log in

On the Determination and Characteristics of Effective Roughness Length for Heterogeneous Terrain

  • Published:
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method is proposed for the effective roughness length (ERL) in heterogeneous terrain based on the principle of equalisation of momentum or heat fluxes calculated by the drag coefficient parameterization scheme used in the ECMWF numerical model. Compared with the area-weighted logarithmically averaged ERL (drag coefficient), the newly calculated ERL (drag coefficient) is about 40% (16%) larger with a roughness step of 2.3. These differences reach their maximum values when the ratio of smooth to rough surface is 60% to 40%. Since the determination by this method is not sensitive to the atmospheric stratification, it is suitable for use in climate models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andre, J. C., and C. Blondin, 1980: On the effective roughness length for use in numerical three-dimensional models. Bmmi.-Laycr Meteor., 35, 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasager, C. B., and N. O. Jensen, 1999: Surface-flux aggregation in heterogeneous terrain. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2078–2102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellere, A., and A. J. Pitman, 1992: Land-surface schemes for future climate models: Specification, aggregation, and heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res., 97 D3, 2687–2696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtslag, A. A. M., and A. C. M. Bcljaars, 1989: Surface flux parameterization schemes: Developments and experiences at KNMI. Proceedings of the EOMWF Workshop on Parameterization of Fluxes over Land Surface, ECMWF, Reading, UK, 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, J., and H. Yamazawa, 1986: Aerodynamic roughness over an inhomogeneous ground surface. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 35, 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, J. K, M. Tiedtke, and J. F, Geleyn, 1982: A short history of the PBL-parameterizat.ion at ECMWF. Proceedings of ECMWF workshop on boundary layer parameterization, KCMWF, 59–79.

  • Mason, P. J., 1988: The formation of a really-averaged roughness lengths. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 114, 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. P., and B. Bunzli, 1995: The influence of surface texture on the effective roughness length. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 121, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. A., 1987: Comments and further analysis of effective roughness lengths for use in numerical three-dimensional models. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 39, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihma, T., and H. Savijarvi, 1991: On the effective roughness length for heterogeneous terrain. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 117, 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N., and P. J. Mason, 1991: The influence of static stability on the effective roughness lengths for momentum and heat transfer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 117, 1025–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H. J., and Wang X. L., 1999: Principles and Methodology of Ecoboundary Layer. China Meteorological Press, Beijing, 211 pp. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Z., Su B. K., and Zhao M., 2002: A new method for the calculation of effective roughness length in atmospheric numerical models. Progress in Natural Science, 12, 519–523. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Zhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhong, Z., Zhao, M., Su, B. et al. On the Determination and Characteristics of Effective Roughness Length for Heterogeneous Terrain. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 20, 71–76 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03342051

Key words

Navigation