Skip to main content
Log in

A Rating Inventory for Resident Case Presentations

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We devised a rating scale, the Resident Case Presentation Inventory (RCPI), to evaluate psychiatry residents’ case presentations at our hospital’s disposition conference. A review of 69 inpatient cases presented prior to discharge revealed that residents’ greatest deficiencies were in the following two areas: 1) knowing indications for specific outpatient treatments and 2) coordinating input from various clinical disciplines, both inpatient and outpatient. The RCPI allows early identification of residents’ educational needs and can give ongoing feedback on their progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1989–90 Annual Report of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:1428–1430

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross CA, Leichner P, Matas M, et al: A method of teaching and evaluating psychiatric case formulation. Academic Psychiatry 1990; 14: 99–105

    Google Scholar 

  3. Faulkner LR, Kinzie JD, Angell R, et al: A comprehensive psychiatric formulation model. Journal of Psychiatric Education 1985; 8:189–203

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galasso D: Guidelines for developing multidisciplinary treatment plans. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1987;38:394–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman RS, Lister P: The current status of psycho-dynamic formulation. Psychiatry 1987; 50:126–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry S, Cooper AM, Michels R: The psychodynamic formulation: its purpose, structure and clinical application. Am J Psychiatry 1987; 144:543–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harper G: Focal inpatient treatment planning. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1989; 28:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muzzin LJ, Hart L: Oral examinations, in Assessing Clinical Competence, edited by V Neufeld and G Norman, New York, Springer, 1985, pp. 71–93

  9. Streiner D: Global rating scales, in Assessing Clinical Competence, edited by V Neufeld and G Norman, New York, Springer, 1985, pp. 119–141

  10. Lloyd JS (ed): Oral Examinations in Medical Specialty Board Certification. Chicago, American Board of Medical Specialties, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stillman PL, Gillers MA: Clinical performance evaluation in medicine and law, in Performance Assessment, edited by RA Berk, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, pp. 393–445

  12. Pokorny AD, Frazier SH: An evaluation of oral examinations. Journal of Medical Education 1966; 41:28–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis JM, Usdin G (eds): Treatment Planning in Psychiatry. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frances A, Ciarkin J, Perry S: Differential Therapeutics in Psychiatry: The Art and Science of Treatment Selection. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perry S, Frances A, Clarkin J: A DSM-III casebook for differential therapeutics. New York, Brunner/Mazel, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haas G, Clarkin J: Differential therapeutics and treatment format, in APA Annual Review, vol 6, edited by R Hales and A Frances, Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1987, pp. 353–377

  17. Karasu T (ed): American Psychiatric Association commission on psychiatric therapies, in The Psychiatric Therapies, Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frances A, Shear M, Fyer M: Differential therapeutics: clinical, teaching, research and administrative issues, in APA Annual Review, vol 6, pp. 428–437

  19. Finberg L, Lloyd JS: Suggested guidelines for ideal oral examinations, in Oral Examinations in Medical Specialty Board Certification. Chicago, American Board of Medical Specialties, 1983, pp. 125–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellerstein, D.J., Barron, C.T., Schwartz, H.I. et al. A Rating Inventory for Resident Case Presentations. Acad Psychiatry 15, 146–152 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341938

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341938

Keywords

Navigation