Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

  • Special Topic Section: Innovative Applications of a Public Health Approach to School Psychology Practice
  • Published:

Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Powerful Mental Health Interventions in the Schools

Abstract

School psychologists can work within a Response to Intervention (RtI) framework to increasingly promote the mental health of students. This article shares the unfolding of two composite case studies that exemplify how a practicing school psychologist can use a problem-solving framework to deliver effective mental health interventions to individual students. The first case involved an elementary school student who markedly improved in terms of on-task behavior, and the second case concerned a high school student who overcame school refusal and negative affect. The advantages of providing brief counseling and psychological consultation prior to a possible full evaluation or special education placement are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bardos, A., McDougal, J.L., & Meier, S. (2010). Empirically based progress monitoring for behavioral and socioemotional interventions. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.

  2. Barnett, D.W., Daly, E.J., III, Jones, K.M., & Lentz, F.E., Jr. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66–79.

  3. Barnett, D.W., Elliot, N., Graden, J., Ihlo, T., Nantais, M., & Prasse, D. (2006). Technical adequacy for response to intervention practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 20–31.

  4. Barnett, D.W., VanDerHeyden, A.M., & Witt, J.C. (2007). Achieving science-based practice through response to intervention: What it might look like in preschools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 31–54.

  5. Bolt, S.E. (2005). Reflections on practice within the Heartland problem-solving model: The perceived value of direct assessment of student needs. The California School Psychologist, 10, 65–79.

  6. Briesch, A.M., & Chafouleas, S.M. (2009). Review and analysis of literature on self-management interventions to promote appropriate classroom behaviors (1988–2008). School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 106–118.

  7. Cheney, D., Flower, A., & Templeton, T. (2008). Applying response to intervention metrics in the social domain for students at risk of developing emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 108–126.

  8. Froiland, J.M. (2006). Problem-Solving for Success: The latest applications in learning, attention, and behavior disorders [Course workbook]. Nashville, TN: Cross Country Education.

  9. Gresham, F.M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326–343.

  10. Gresham, F.M. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 328–344.

  11. Hawken, L.S., Vincent, C.G., & Schumann, J. (2008). Response to intervention for social behavior: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 213–225.

  12. Lieberman, R.G., Yoder, P.J., Reichow, B., & Wolery, M. (2010). Visual analysis of multiple baseline across participants graphs when change is delayed. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 28–44.

  13. Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539–544.

  14. Noell, G.H., Duhon, G.J., Gatti, S.L., & Connell, J.E. (2002). Consultation, follow-up, and implementation of behavior management interventions in general education. School Psychology Review, 31, 217–234.

  15. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-466. Federal Register, 70, 35802–35803.

  16. U.S. Surgeon General. (1999). Mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Retrieved June 23, 2010, from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/home.html

  17. VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225–256.

  18. Walter, J.L., & Peller, J.E. (1992). Becoming solution-focused in brief therapy. Levittown, PA: Brunner/Mazel.

  19. Wampold, B.E. (2007). Psychotherapy: The humanistic (and effective) treatment. American Psychologist, 62, 857–873.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to John Mark Froiland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Froiland, J.M. Response to Intervention as a Vehicle for Powerful Mental Health Interventions in the Schools. Contemp School Psychol 15, 35–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340961

Download citation

KEYWORDS

  • mental health
  • intervention
  • problem-solving
  • elementary school students
  • high school students