Abstract
The 2004 authorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act affords an opportunity to shift the classification of Learning Disabilities (LD) from a “refer-test-place” to a Response-to-Intervention (RtI) service delivery model. As a result, there are implications for the professional activities of school psychologists. School psychologists, who historically devoted much of their time to testing struggling learners for learning disabilities, will need to engage in a different type of practice, specifically providing instructional consultation in a tiered assessment and intervention model. This article describes instructional consultation skills and knowledge school psychologists must possess to promote the learning outcomes of students with achievement deficits, including students with disabilities. Survey data collected from 249 California school psychologist practitioners highlight the need to modify school psychology pre-service training and on-going professional development to enable school psychologists to become effective instructional consultants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2003). Applied behavioral analysis for teachers (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 1, 91–97.
Bent, J. & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Training general education pupils to monitor reading using curriculum-based measurement procedures. School Psychology Review, 19, 23–33.
Bergan, J. R., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. l. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness to intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 381–394.
Burns, M. K., Deno, S., & Jimerson, S. R. (2007). Toward a unified model of Response to Intervention. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 428–440). New York: Springer.
Busse, R., Leung, B., Powers, K., & Siembieda, D. (2005) CASPSurvey of Practitioners. Unpublished survey.
Canter, A. (2006). Problem solving and RtI: New roles for school psychologists. Communiqué, 34, 5.
Carnine, D.W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., Tarver, S.G., & Jungjohann, K. (2006). Teaching struggling and at-risk readers: A direct instruction approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Cronbach, L. J., (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
Daly, E. J., Andersen, M., Gortmaker, V., & Turner, A. (2006). Using experimental analysis to identify reading intervention: Connecting the dots. Behavior Analyst Today, 7(1), 133–150.
Daly, E. J., III; Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Dool, E. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554–74.
DiPerna, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement. School Psychology Review, 3, 293–298.
DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2005). A model of academic enablers and mathematics achievement in the elementary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 379–392.
Duhon, G. J., Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Freeland, J. T., Dufrene, B. A., Gilbertson, D. N. (2004). Identifying academic skill and performance deficits: The experimental analysis of brief assessments of academic skills. School Psychology Review, 33, 429–443.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621–626.
Fuchs, L. S., Seethaler, P. M., Powell, S. R., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Best practices in increasing academic learning time. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Best practices in school psychology IV: Volume I (4th ed., pp. 773–787). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Glover, T. A., & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526–540.
Graden, J. (2004). Arguments for change to consultation, prevention, and intervention: Will school psychology ever achieve this promise? Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 15, 345–359.
Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfield, S. (2006). Impact of instructional consultation teams on the disproportionate referral and placement of minority students in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 42–52.
Greenwood, C.R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time engagement and academic achievement in at-risk and non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
Gresham, F.M. (2007). Evolution of the Response-to-Intervention concept: Empirical foundations and recent developments. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. (pp. 10–24). New York: Springer.
Hagans-Murillo, K. S. (2005). Using a response-to-intervention approach in preschool to promote literacy. The California School Psychologist, 10, 45–54.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. 108-446 (2004).
Ikeda, M. J., Rahn-Blakeslee, A., Niebling, B.C., Gustafson, J.K., Allison, R., & Stumme, J. (2007). The Heartland area education agency 11 problem-solving approach: An overview and lessons learned. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 255–268). New York: Springer Science Inc.
Jenkins, J. R., Peyton, J. A., Sanders, E. A., & Vadasy, P. F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 53–86.
Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds) (2007). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
Jones, K. M., & Wickstrom, K. F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554–568.
Kame’enui, E. J. & Simmons, D. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
Kovaleski, J. F., Gickling, E. E., Morrow, H., & Swank, H. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170–183.
Kratochwill, T. R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
Lewis, T. J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–24.
Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2003). Problem-solving model for decision making with high incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 187–200.
Marston, D., Lau, M. & Muyskens, P. (2007). Implementation of the problem-solving model in the Minneapolis public schools. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 279–287). New York: Springer Science Inc.
Mathes, P.G., Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182.
National Council on Teacher Quality (2006) What education schools aren’t teaching about reading and what Elementary teachers aren’t learning. Retrieved January 15, 2008 from http://www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/nctq_reading_study_exec_summ_20071202065444.pdf
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Retrieved February 20, 2008 from http://www.ncld.org/images/stories/downloads/njcldreports/njcld_rti2005.pdf.
Peterson, D.W., Prasse, D.P., Shinn, M.R., & Swerdlik, M. (2007). The Illinois flexible service delivery model: A problem-solving model initiative. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 300–318). New York: Springer Science Inc.
Porter, L., Batsche, G., Castillo, J., & Witte, R. (March, 2006). Problem-solving and response-to-intervention: School psychologists’ beliefs, practices, and training needs. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Anaheim, CA.
Powers, K., Hagans, K. S., & Miller, M. (2007). Using response-to-intervention strategies to promote transition from special education services. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K, & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), The handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer Science.
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
Reschly, D. J., Hosp, J. L., & Schmied, C. M. (2003, August 20). And miles to go…: State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendations. Retrieved July 3, 2006 from www.ncrld.org, pp. 3–10.
Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future: In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed.), pp. 3–21. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Rosenfield, S. (2002). Developing instructional consultants: From novice to competent to expert. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13, 97–111.
Rosenshine, B. & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Santi, K. & Vaughn, S. (2007). Progress monitoring: An integral part of instruction. Read Writ, 20, 535–537.
Shapiro, E.S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and interventions (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Using an RtI model to guide early reading instruction: Effects on identification rates for students with learning disabilities (Florida Center for Reading Research Technical Report No. 7). Retrieved October 15, 2007, from http://www.fcrr.org/TechnicalReports/Response_to_intervention_Florida.pdf.
VanDerHeyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Barnett, D. W. (2005). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 339–361.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.
Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Response to “Learning Disabilities: Historical Perspectives.” In T. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.) Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ysseldyke, J. E, & Christenson, S. (2002). Functional assessment of academic behaviors: Creating successful learning environments. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Powers, K., Hagans, K. & Busse, R.T. School Psychologists as Instructional Consultants in a Response-to-Intervention Model. Contemp School Psychol 13, 41–53 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340941
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340941