Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodological challenges in measurements of functional ability in gerontological research. A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses two important challenges in the measurement of functional ability in gerontological research: the first challenge is to connect measurements to a theoretical frame of reference which enhances our understanding and interpretation of the collected data; the second relates to validity in all stages of the research from operationalization to meaningful follow-up measurements in longitudinal studies. Advantages and disadvantages in different methods to do the measurements of functional ability are described with main focus on frame of reference, operationalization, practical procedure, validity, discriminatory power, and responsiveness. In measures of functional ability it is recommended: 1) always to consider the theoretical frame of reference as part of the validation process (e.g., the theory of “the Disablement Process”; 2) always to assess whether the included activities and categories are meaningful to all people in the study population before they are combined into an index and before tests for construct validity; 3) not to combine mobility, PADL and IADL in the same index/scale; 4) not to use IADL as a health-related functional ability measure or, if used, to ask whether problems with IADL or non-performance of IADL are caused by health-related factors; 5) always to make analyses of functional ability for men and women separately as patterns of functional ability and patterns of associations between other variables and functional ability often vary for men and women; and 6) to exclude the dead in analyses of change in functional ability if the focus is on predictors of deterioration in functional ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Branch L.G., A.R.: Assessing physical function in the elderly. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 3: 29–51, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feinstein A.R., Josephy B.R., Wells C.K.: Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann. Intern. Med. 105: 413–420, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kane R.L.: The implications of assessment. J. Gerontol. 48: 27–31, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katz S.: Assessing self-maintenance: Activities of Daily living, Mobility, and Instrumental Activities of Daily living. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 31: 721–727, 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodgers H.: Standardized functional assessment scales for elderly patients. Age Ageing 22: 161–163, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubenstein L.: The clinical effectiveness of multidimensional geriatric assessment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 31: 758–762, 1983.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubenstein L.V.: Functional evaluation of the elderly. Hosp. Pract. March 30:101–106, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brorsson B.: ADL-index. Combined measures of the individual’s ability to manage activities of daily living. A review of methodsx (In Swedish) ADL-index. Combined measures of the individual’s ability to manage activities of daily living. A review of methods. The Medical Research Council, Stockholm, 1980, pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kane R.A., Kane R.L.: Assessing the elderly. A practical guide to measurement. Lexington Books, Toronto, 1981, pp. 1–301.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fillenbaum G.G.: The wellbeing of the elderly. Approaches to multidimensional assessment. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1984, pp. 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Israël L., Kozarevic D., Sartorius N.: Evaluations en gerontologie. Vol 1. Manuel de références des moyens d’investigation et de mesure des fonctions mentales. Karger, Basel, 1984, pp. 1–342.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McDowell I., Newell C.: Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, 1987, pp. 1–342.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Applegate W.B., Blass J.P., Williams T.F.: Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 322: 1207–1214, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowling A.: Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Buckingham, England, 1991, pp. 1–199.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reuben D.B., Wieland D.L., Rubenstein L.Z.: Functional status assessment of older persons: Concepts and implications. Facts and Research in Gerontology 7: 231–240, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avlund K.: Measuring functional ability from age 70 to age 75. (In Danish). FADL’s Publishing Firm, Copenhagen, 1995, pp. 1–187.

    Google Scholar 

  17. WHO: The International Classifcation of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A manual classification relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1980, pp. 1–205.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nagi S.Z.: Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman M.B. (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation. American Sociological Asssociation, Washington D.C., 1965, pp. 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nagi S.Z.: Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope A.M., Tarlov A.R. (Eds.), Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1991, pp. 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pope A.M., Tarlov A.R.: Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Verbrugge L.M., Jette A.M.: The disablement process. Soc. Sci. Med. 38: 1–14, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schultz-Larsen K.: Chronic disease and functional ability among 70-year-old men and women (In Danish). Publication from the Institute of Social Medicine, Copenhagen, 1993, pp. 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoeyman N., Feskens E.J.M., Bos G.A.M. van den, Kromhout D.: Measuring functional status: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report. (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990–1993). J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49: 1103–1110, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schroll M.: The main pathway to musculoskeletal disability. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 4: 3–12, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sonn U.: Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among the elderly. Thesis. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Geriatric Medicine, Göteborg, 1995, pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Verbrugge L.M.: New thinking and science on disability in mid- and late life. Eur. J. Public Health 5: 20–28, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lawrence R.H., Jette A.M.: Disentangling the Disablement Process. J. Gerontol. 51b: S173–S182, 1996.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jette A.M., Branch L.G.: Musculoskeletal impairment among the non-institutionalized aged. Int. Rehabil. Med. 6: 157–161, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Verbrugge L.M.: Disability. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am. 16: 741–761, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Czaja S.J., Weber R.A., Nair S.N.: A human factor analysis of ADL activities: A capability-demand approach. J. Gerontol. 48: 44–48, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tinetti M.E.: Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 4: 119–126, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lindmark B., Hamrin E.: Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 20: 103–109, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guralnik J.M., Branch L.G., Cummings S.R., Curb J.D.: Physical Performance Measures in aging research. J. Gerontol. 44: M141–M146, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Avlund K., Kreiner S., Schultz-Larsen K.: Construct validation and the Rasch Model: Functional ability of healthy elderly people. Scand. J. soc. Med. 21: 233–245, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagi S.Z.: Disability, health status, and utilization of health services. Int. J. Health Services 10: 657–676, 1980.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jette A.M.: The Functional Status Index: Reliability and validity of a self-report functional disability measure. J. Rheumatol. 14: 15–19, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosow I., Breslau N.: A Guttman health scale for the aged. J. Gerontol. 21: 556–559, 1966.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Strawbridge W.J., Kaplan G.A., Camacho T.C., Cohen R.D.: The dynamics of disability and functional change in an elderly cohort: Results from the Alameda County Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 40: 799–806, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Guralnik J.M., LaCroix A.Z., Abbott R.D., Berkman L.F., Satterfield S., Evans D.A., Wallace R.B.: Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. Am. J. Epidemiol. 137: 845–857, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kjøller M., Rasmussen N., Keiding L., Petersen H.C., Nielsen G.A.: Health and morbidity in Denmark 1994 and the development since 1987 (In Danish). Danish Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, Copenhagen, 1995, pp. 1–335.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Avlund K., Davidsen M., Schultz-Larsen K.: Changes in functional ability from age 70 to 75: A Danish longitudinal study. J. Aging Health 7: 254–282, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Katz S., Ford A.B., Moskowitz R.W., Jackson B.A., Jaffe M.W.: Studies of illness in the aged. JAMA 12: 914–919, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mahoney I.I., Barthel D.w.: Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md. Med J. 22/23: 61–65, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ashworth R.J., Reuben D.B., Benton L.A.: Functional profiles of healthy older persons. Age Ageing 23: 34–39, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Manton K.G.: A longitudinal study of functional change and mortality in the United States. J. Gerontol. 43: 153–161, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lawton M.P., Brody E.M.: Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186, 1969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fillenbaum G.G.: Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental Activities of Daily living measure. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 33: 698–706, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Spector W.D., Katz S., Murphy J.B., Fulton J.P.: The hierarchical relationship between Activities of Daily living and Instrumental Activities of Daily living. J. Chronic Dis. 40: 481–489, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Åsberg K.H., Sonn U.: The cumulative structure of Personal and Instrumental ADL. A study of elderly people in a health service district. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 21: 171–177, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Deeg D.J.H.: Sex differences in IADL in the Netherlands: functional and situational disability. In: Robine J-M., Mathers C.D., Bone M.R., Romieu I. (Eds.), Calculation of health expectancies: harmonization, consensus achieved and future perspectives. INSERM/John Libey Eurotext ltd, 1993, pp. 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jette A.M., Deniston O.L.: Inter-observer reliability of a functional status assessment instrument. J. Chronic Dis. 31: 573–580, 1978.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jette A.M.: Functional capacity evaluation: An empirical approach. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 61: 85–89, 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lammi U.K., Kivelä S.K., Nissinen A., Pekkanen J., Punsar S.: Functional capacity and associated factors in elderly Finnish men. Scand. J. soc. Med. 17: 67–75, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Suurmeijer T.P.B.M., Doeglas D.M., Moum T., Briancon S., Krol B., Sanderman R., Guillemin F., Bjelle A., van den Heuvel W.J.A.: The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale for measuring disability: Its utility in international comparisons. Am. J. Public Health 84: 1270–1273, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Multidimensional Functional Asssessment: The OARS Methodology. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human development, Durham, North Carolina, 1978, pp. 1–226.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sarno J.E., Sarno M.R., Levita E.: The Functional life Scale. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 54: 214–220, 1973.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Währens E.E., Nielsen B.: ADL-index — a try-out. (In Danish). Diakonissestiftelsen, Copenhagen, 1991, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wade D.T., Legh-Smith J., Hewer R.L.: Social activities after stroke; measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int. Rehabil. Med. 7: 176–181, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Myers A.M.: The Clinical Swiss Army Knife. Empirical evidence on the validity of IADL functional status measures. Med. Care 30: MS96–MS111, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Avlund K., Schultz-Larsen K., Kreiner S.: The measurement of Instrumental ADL: Content validity and construct validity. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 5: 371–383, 1993.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Legarth K.H.: Most important activities for 75-year olds. (In Danish). Legarth Teaching & Data, Vaerloese, Denmark, pp. 1-99.

  62. Tugwell P., Bombardier C., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C., Grace E., Hanna B.: The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire — An individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 14: 446–451, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fisher A.G.: Functional measures (Part 1): what is function, what should we measure, and how should we measure it? Am. J. Occup. Ther. 46: 183–185, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Jette A.M.: Concepts of health and methodological issues in functional assessment. In: Granger C.V., Gresham G.E. (Eds.), Functional assessment in rehabilitation medicine. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984, pp. 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Barberger-Gateau P., Chaslerie A., Dartigues J-F., Commenges D., Gagnon M., Salamon R.: Health measures correlates in a French elderly community population: The PAQUID study. J. Gerontol. 47: S88–S95, 1992.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sonn U., Frändin K., Grimby G.: Instrumental activities of daily living related to impairments and functional limitations in 70-year olds and changes between 70 and 76 years of age. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 27: 119–128, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Laukkanen P., Kauppinen M., Era P., Heikkinen E.: Factors related to coping with physical and instrumental activities of daily living among people born in 1904–1923. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 8: 287–196, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sonn U., Hulter Åsberg K.: Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. A study of a population of 76-year olds in Gothenburg, Sweden. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 23:193–202, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Sonn U., Grimby G., Svanborg A.: Activities of Daily living studied longitudinally between 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil. Rehabil. 18: 91–100, 1996.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Allen S.M., Mor V., Raveis V., Houts P.: Measurement of need for assistance with daily activities: Quantifying the influence of gender roles. J. Gerontol. 48: S204–S211, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ford A.B., Folmar S.J., Salmon R.B., Medalie J.H., Roy A.W., Galazka S.S.: Health and function in the old and very old. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 36: 187–197, 1988.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Shanas E.: Health and incapacity in later life. In: Shanas E., Townsend P., Wedderburn D., Friis H., Milhøj P., Stehouwer J. (Eds.), Old people in three industrial societies. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1968, pp. 18–48.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Heikkinen E., Waters W.E., Brzezinsky Z.J.: The elderly in eleven countries. A sociomedical survey. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, 1983, pp. 1–231.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Waters W.E., Heikkinen E., Dontas A.S.: Health lifestyles and services for the elderly. Public Health in Europe. world Health Organization, Copenhagen, 1989, pp. 1–222.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Fillenbaum G.G.: Assessment of health and functional status: an international comparison. In: Kane R.L., Grimley Evans J., MacFadyen D. (Eds.), Improving the health of older people: a world view. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990, pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Osler M., Groot L.C.P.G.M., Enzi G.: life-style: physical activities and activities of daily living. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 45: 139–151, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Avlund K., Davidsen M., Schroll M., Gause-Nilsson I., Laukkanen P., Heikkinen E.: Self-reported functional ability in three Nordic localities. A comparative study of Activities of Daily living among 75-year-old men and women in Glostrup, Gothenburg and Jyväskylä. Int. J. Health Sciences 5: 119–128, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Chen P., Yu E.S.H., Zhang M., Liu W.T., Hill R., Katzman R.: ADL dependence and medical conditions in Chinese older persons: A population-based survey in Shanghai, China. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 43: 378–383, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Avlund K., Luck M., Tinsley R.: Cultural differences in functional ability among elderly people in Birmingham, England, and Glostrup, Denmark. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 11: 1–16, 1996.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Dawson D., Hendershot G., Fulton J.: Aging in the eighties Functional limitations of individuals aged 65 years and over. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. No. 133. DHHS Pub No. (PHS) 8–1250. Public Health Service. Hyattsville, MD, June 10, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Carmines E.G., Zeller R.A.: Reliability and validity assessment. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 97–001. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, 1979, pp. 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Bollen K., Lennox R.: Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychol. Bull. 110: 305–314, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Guttman L.: The basis for scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer S.A., Guttman L., Suchman E.A., Lazarsfield P.F., Star S.A., Clausen J.A. (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1950, pp. 60–90.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Andrich D.: Rasch Models for Measurement. Sage University Paper. Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–001. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, 1988, pp. 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Fried L.P., Ettinger W.H., Lind B., Newman A.B., Gardin J.: Physical disability in older adults: A physiological approach. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 47: 747–760, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Teresi J.A., Golden R.R., Gurland B.J., Wilder D.E., Bennet R.G.: Construct validity of indicator-scales developed from the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation interview Schedule. J. Gerontol. 39: 147–157, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Norström T., Thorslund M.: The structure of IADL and ADL measures: Some findings from a Swedish study. Age Ageing 20: 23–28, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Stewart A., Ware J.E., Brook R.H.: The meaning of health: Understanding functional limitations. Med. Care 15: 939–952, 1977.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Fitzgerald J.F., Smith D.M., Martin D.K., Freedman J.A., Wolinsky F.D.: Replication of the multidimensionality of activities of daily living. J. Gerontol. 48: S28–S31, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Fillenbaum G.G.: Validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire. In: Multidimensional Functional Asssessment: the OARs Methodoloy. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human development, Durham, North Carolina, 1978, pp. 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Brazier J.E., Harper R., Jones N.M.B., O’Cathain A., Thomas K.J., Usherwood T., Westlake L.: Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. Br. Med J. 305: 160–164, 1992.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Seeman T.E., Charpentier P.A., Berkman L.F., Tinetti M.E., Guralnik J.M., Albert M., Blazer D., Rowe J.W.: Predicting changes in physical performance in a high-functioning elderly cohort: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging. J. Gerontol. 49: M97–M108, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Berkman L.F., Seeman T.E., Albert M., Blazer D., Kahn R., Mohs R., Finch C., Schneider E., Cotman C., McCleran G., Nesselroade J., Featherman D., Garmezy N., McKhann G., Brim G., Prager D., Rowe J.: High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: Findings from the MacArthur Foundation Research network on successful aging. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 46: 1129–1140, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Schoenfeld D.E., Charpentier P.A., Blazer D.G., Gold D.T., Seeman T.E.: Self-rated health and mortality in the high-functoning elderly — a closer look at healthy individuals: MacArthur Field Study of Successful Aging. J. Gerontol. 49: M109–M115, 1994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Guralnik J.M., Seeman T.E., Tinetti M.E., Nevitt M.C., Berkman L.F.: Validation and use of performance measures of functioning in a non-disabled older population: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 6: 410–419, 1994.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Fried L.P., Herdman S.J., Kuhn K.E., Rubin G., Turano K.: Preclinical disability. Hypotheses about the bottom of the iceberg. J. Aging Health 3: 285–300, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Guralnik J.M., Ferrucci L., Simonsick E.M., Salive M.E., Wallace R.B.: Lower extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N. Engl. J. Med. 332: 556–561, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Pfeiffer E., Johnson T.M., Chiofolo R.C.: Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 29: 433–437, 1981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Pfeiffer B.A., McClelland T., Lawson J.: Use of the Functional Assessment Inventory to distinguish among the rural elderly in five service settings. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 37: 243–248, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Hunt S.M., McKenna S.P., McEwen J., Williams J., Papp E.: The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc. Sci. Med. 15A: 221–229, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Jenkinson C., Fitzpatrick R., Argyle M.: The Nottingham Health Profile: An analysis of its sensitivity in differentiating illness groups. Soc. Sci Med. 23: 1411–1414, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Thorsen H., McKenna S.P., Gottschalck L.: Perceived health in three groups of elderly people. Dan. Med. Bull. 42: 105–108, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Avlund K., Kreiner S., Schultz-Larsen K.: Functional ability scales for the elderly. A validation study. Eur. J. Public Health 6: 35–42, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Hayes V., Morris J., Wolfe C., Morgan M.: The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: Is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing 24: 120–125, 1995.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Bowling A.K., Farquhar M., Browne P.: Use of services in old age: Data from three surveys of elderly people. Soc. Sci Med. 33: 689–700, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Jagger C., Spiers N.A., Clarke M.: Factors associated with decline in function, institutionalization and mortality of elderly people. Age Ageing 22: 190–197, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Holstein B., Almind G., Due P., Holst E.: Self-reported health situation and drug use among elderly persons (In Danish). Ugeskr. Laeger 152: 386–391, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Sørensen K.H.: Functional status among old people in Copenhagen. From an epidemiological interview survey of 75-, 80-, and 85-year-old people in Copenhagen (In Danish). Ugeskr. Laeger 145: 3853–3858, 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Hendriksen C., Lund E., Strømgärd E.: Functional ability of elderly people. A report from the “Rödovre project” (In Danish). Ugeskr. Laeger 149: 1835–1839, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Bergström G., Aniansson A., Bjelle A., Grimby G., Lundgren-Lindquist B., Svanborg A.: Functional consequences of joint impairment at age 79. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 17: 183–190, 1985.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Guyatt G.H., Deyo R.A., Charlson M., Levine M.N., Mitchell A.: Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarification. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 42: 403–408, 1989.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Kirshner B., Guyatt G.: A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J. Chronic Dis. 38: 27–36, 1985.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Deyo R.A., Diehr P., Patrick D.L.: Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin. Trials 12: 142S–158S, 1991.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Siu A.L., Hays R.D., Ousländer J.G., Osterwell D., Valdez R.B., Krynski M., Gross A.: Measuring functioning and health in the very old. J. Gerontol. 48: M10–M14, 1993.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Bowling A., Faquhar M., Grundy E.: Associations with changes in levels of functional ability. Results from a follow-up survey at two and a half years of people aged 85-years and over at baseline interview. Aging and society 14: 53–73, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Valvanne J., Erkinjuntti T., Tilvis R.: Predictors of declining mobility. In: Harris S., Era P., Suominen H., Harris W.S. (Eds.), Physical activity, aging and sports. Vol III: toward healthy aging-international perspectives. Part 1. Physiological and biomedical aspects. Center for the Study of Aging, Albany, New York, 1994, pp. 225–233 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Yeo G., Ingram L., Skurnick J., Crapo L.: Effects of a geriatric clinic on functional health and well-being of elders. J. Gerontol. 42: 252–258, 1987.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Folker H., Ebling S.: Evaluation of functional ability before and after treatment in a psychiatric day ward (In Danish). Ugeskr. Laeger 152: 2354–2356, 1990.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Holstein B., Due P., Almind G., Holst E.: Change in self-rated health and functional ability in old age. In: Abstracts from the XIII Nordic Congress in Social Medicine, Göteborg, Sweden, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine and Psychosocial Health, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark

    K. Avlund Ph.D.

  2. The Glostrup Population Studies, Medical Department C, Glostrup County Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

    K. Avlund Ph.D.

Authors
  1. K. Avlund Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Avlund, K. Methodological challenges in measurements of functional ability in gerontological research. A review. Aging Clin Exp Res 9, 164–174 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340145

Key words

Search

Navigation