Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Alternative Processes for Aluminum Production on Energy Requirements

  • Extractive & Process Metallurgy
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Increasing prices and the shortage of large blocks of electrical energy have given greater impetus to the search for viable alternative processes for aluminum production. These include electrolysis of aluminum chloride, sulfide, and nitride; carbothermal reduction of either the ore or alumina; and disproportioning reactions of either aluminum sulfide or the monochloride route. Common to all these processes are the starting material—an ore containing aluminum oxide—and the final product—the metal. Thus, the thermodynamic cycle will invariably dictate similar theoretical energy requirements for the three processes. In practice, however, the achievable efficiencies and, more noticeably, the proportion of electrical to carbothermal energy required for the various stages of operation can vary.

The present status of these alternative processes indicates that while alternative routes, such as the Alcoa-AlCl3-Smelting Process, show distinct potential for reducing electrical energy requirements, they offer little chance of reducing overall energy requirements. Furthermore, because of more stringent purity requirements, any gains made may be at the expense of production costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Bratland, K. Grjotheim, and C. Krohn, “Thermodynamic Discussion of Some Energy Problems in Al-Electrolysis,” Light Metals Vol. 1, TMS-AIME, New York, 1976, p. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. JANAF Thermochemical Tables, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards publication NSRDS-NBS 37, July 1970.

  3. K.B. Bennington et al. (Kaiser Engineering), U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Mines Report PB 286 638, September 1977, p. 267.

  4. N.E. Richard and B.J. Welch, “Anodic Overpotentials and Mechanism of the Anode Process on Carbon in Cryolite-Alumina Electrolytes,” Electrochemistry—Proceedings of 1st Aust. Conference,” ed. by F. Gutmann and J. Friend, Pergamon Press, 1964, p. 901–922.

  5. A.D. Little Inc., “A Survey of Potential Processes for the Manufacture of Aluminum,” Argonne Nat. Lab. Report, ANL-OEPM 794, December 1979.

  6. K. Grjotheim, C. Krohn, and H. A. Øye, “Aluminiumherstellung aus Aluminumchlorid—eine kritische Betrachtung von Toth- und Alcoa-Verfahren,” Aluminum 51, (1975) p. 697–699.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.J. Gardner and D.J. Milne, Investigation report No. 132, Inst. of Earth Resources of C.S.I.R.O. ISBN 0 643-02321-6, 1979.

  8. D.J. Haase and D.C. Walker, “The COSORB Process,” Chem. Eng. Progress 70 (1974) p. 74–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.J. Milne, “The Chlorination of Alumina and Bauxite with Chlorine and Carbon Monoxide,” Proc. Aus. Inst. of Min. & Met. (260) (1976) p. 23–31.

  10. C. Toth, “Aluminum Process Shows Metallurgical Trends,” Mining Mag. 129, p. 203–204.

  11. P.L. King and B.J. Welch, “Factors Determining Lead Yields During Electrolysis of PbS Dissolved in Molten Chlorides,” Proc. Aus. Inst. Min. & Met. (246)(1973) p. 7–12.

  12. S.M. Sells, “Mass-Transfer Effects with the High-Temperature Sulphide-Ion-Sulphur Electrode,” Electrochimica Acta 15 (1970) p. 1285–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Skyllas and B.J. Welch, “A Current Reversal Chronopotentiometric Study of the Electrochemical Reactions of PbS in PbCl2-NaCl,” Electrochimica Acta 23 (1978) p. 1157–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Motzfeldt, “Carbothermic Reduction of Alumina,” Paper presented at the ICSOBA-A1M Conference: New Processes in Aluminium Production, Cagliari, September 26–28, 1979.

  15. K. Motzfeldt and B. Sandberg, “Chemical Investigations Concerning Carbothermic Reduction of Alumina,” Light Metals Vol. 1, TMS-AIME, Warrendale, Pennsylvania 1979, p. 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kai Grjothelm received his Diploma in chemistry in 1950 and his Dr. Techn. In 1956 from the Technical University of Norway (NTH), Trondheim. He has been professor of inorganic chemistry at the University of Oslo, Norway since 1973. He previously held the same position at this Alma Mater in Trondheim, where he also served as head of the Department of Chemistry. Professor Grjotheim’s main area of research is fused salt chemistry and its application to industrial problems. He has published numerous papers in this area and has authored a recent book, Aluminum Electrolysis. The Chemistry of the Hall-Héroult Process. He has received several international awards for his work. including the Italian “Guido Donegadi” gold medal and “La Medaille Sant-Clair Deville” of the French Metallurgical Society. He has been a frequent speaker at AIME Annual Meetings.

Barry Welch is professor of chemical and materials engineering and head of the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering with the School of Engineering at the University of Auckland. He received his MSc and PhD from the University of New Zealand. He was recently awarded a DSc for his contributions to applied electrochemistry by the University of Auckland. He first developed his research interest in aluminum smelter technology while working with Reynolds Metals Research Division in 1960–1963. This continued to be the central theme of his research group while on the staff of the University of New South Wales, Australia. His collaboration with Kai Grjotheim extends over 12 years and includes coauthoring the book Aluminum Smelter TechnologyA Pure and Applied Approach, as well as numerous other publications.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grjotheim, K., Welch, B. Impact of Alternative Processes for Aluminum Production on Energy Requirements. JOM 33, 26–32 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339491

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03339491

Keywords

Navigation