Quantitative dam break analysis on a reservoir earth dam

  • F. W. L. Kho
  • P. L. Law
  • S. H. Lai
  • Y. W. Oon
  • L. H. Ngu
  • H. S. Ting
Article

Abstract

Mathematical simulations on dam break or failure using BOSS DAMBRK hydrodynamic flood routing dam break model were carried out to determine the extent of flooding downstream, flood travel times, flood water velocities and impacts on downstream affected residences, properties and environmental sensitive areas due to floodwaters released by failure of the dam structure. Computer simulations for one of the worse case scenarios on dam failure using BOSS DAMBRK software accounted for dam failure, storage effects, floodplains, over bank flow and flood wave attenuation. The simulated results reviewed a maximum flow velocity of 2.40 m/s with a discharge of approximately 242 mз /s occurred at 1.00 km downstream. The maximum discharge increased from 244 m3/s (flow velocity = 1.74 m/s occurred at 8th. km) to 263 m3/s (flow velocity = 1.37 m/s occurred at 12th. km); about a 39% drop in flow velocity over a distance of 4.00 km downstream. If the entire dam gives way instantly, some spots stretching from 0.00 km (at dam site) to approximately 3.40 km downstream of the dam may be categorized as “danger zone”, while downstream hazard and economic loss beyond 3.40 km downstream can be classified as “low” or “minimal” zones.

Keywords

Modeling hydrodynamic broad-crested weir routing flood waves 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ASCE, (2000). Guidelines for instrumentation and measurements for monitoring dam performance. American Society of Civil Engineers, USA, 712.Google Scholar
  2. Balloffet, A. E.; Cole, E.; Balloffet, A. F., (1974). Dam collapse wave in a river. J. Hydraul. Div., 100(5), 645–655 (11 pages).Google Scholar
  3. BOSS International, (1999). BOSS DAMBRK hydrodynamics flooding routing user’s manual. Madison, Wiscosin, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Chow, V. T., (1964). Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, U.S.A., 38–40.Google Scholar
  5. Dressler, R. F., (1954). Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dam-break wave. Int. Assoc. Sci. Pubs., 3(38), 319–328 (20 pages).Google Scholar
  6. Ecosol Consultancy, (2001). Environmental impact assessment for the proposed gerugu dam. Sarikei Division, Sarawak, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  7. Enzel, Y.; Ely, L. L.; Martinez-Goytre, J.; Vivian, R. G., (1994). Paleofloods and dam-failure flood on the virgin river, Utah and Arizona. J. Hydrology, 153(1–4), 291–315 (25 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. FEMA, (1989). Dam safety: Know the potential hazards. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Booklet L152, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Fread, D. L., (1977). The development and testing of a dam-break flood forecasting model. Proceedings of dam-break flood modeling workshop, US Water Resources Council, Washington D. C., 164–197.Google Scholar
  10. Fread, D. L., (1984). The NWS dam-break flood forecasting model. Office of hydrology, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Fread, D. L., (1989). The NWS DAMBRK Model: Theoretical background/user documentation. Hydrologic Research Laboratory, National Weather Services, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Froehlich, D. C., (1995). Peak outflow from breached Embankment dam. J. Water Res., Pl., 121(1), 90–97 (8 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gundlach, D. L.; Thomas, W. A., (1977). Guidelines for calculating and routing a dam-break flood. Research note No. 5, US Army Corps of Engineers, the Hydrologic Engineering Center, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, G. W.; Wagner, D. A., (1967). Outflow from breached Dams. University of Utah, Logan, Utah, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Hoggan, D. H., (1989). Computer-assisted floodplain hydrology and hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Jansen, R. B., (1980). Dams and public safety. Water resources technical publications. Denver. CO Water and Power Resources Service, US Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  17. Jansen, R. B., (1988). Advanced dam engineering for design construction and rehabilitation. Van nostrand reinhold, New York, 8–16.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, F. A.; Illes, P., (1976). A classification of dam failures. Water power and dam construction. USA., 43–45.Google Scholar
  19. King, H. W.; Brater, E. F., (1963). Handbook of hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 23–51.Google Scholar
  20. Liong, S. Y.; Tan, C. C.; Alwis, W. A. M.; Selvalingam, S., (1991). Computer-aided dam break flow routing. Adv. Eng. Softw. Workst., 13(3), 110–115 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rico, M.; Benito, G.; Diez-Herrero, A., (2008a). Flood from tailing dam failures. J. Hazard. Mater., 154(1–3), 79–87 (9 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rico, M.; Benito, G.; Salgueiro, A. R.; Diez-Herrero, A., (2008b). Reported tailing dam failures: A review of the european incidents in the worldwide context. J. Hazard. Mater., 152(2), 846–852 (7 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh, K. P.; Snorrason, A., (1984). Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. J. Hydrology, 68(1–4), 295–310 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, V. P.; Scarlators, P. D., (1988). Analysis of gradual earth-dam failure. J. Hydrology Eng., 114(1), 21–42 (22 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singh, V. P., (1996). Dam breach modeling technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 150–219, 176–186.Google Scholar
  26. Tingsanchali, T.; Chinnarasri, C., (2001). Numerical model of dam failure due to flow overtopping. Hydrolog. Sci. J., 46(1), 113–130 (18 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turahim, A. H.; Mohd, N. A., (2002). Analysis of dam break for disaster preparedness. 2nd. world engineering congress, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 7–9.Google Scholar
  28. USDI, (1988). Downstream hazard classification guidelines. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of reclamation, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Z.; Bowles, D. S., (2006). Dam breach simulations with multiple breach locations under wind and wave actions. Adv. Water Resour., 29(8), 1222–1237 (16 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wurbs, R. A., (1987). Dam-breach flood wave models. J. Hydrologic. Eng., 113(1), 29–46 (6 pages).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. W. L. Kho
    • 1
  • P. L. Law
    • 1
  • S. H. Lai
    • 2
  • Y. W. Oon
    • 1
  • L. H. Ngu
    • 1
  • H. S. Ting
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Malaysia SarawakSarawakMalaysia
  2. 2.Urban Drainage and River Engineering Research CenterUniversity of Science MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations