Skip to main content
Log in

Application of the SCOFF, Eating Attitude Test 26 (EAT 26) and Eating Inventory (TFEQ) questionnaires in young women seeking diet-therapy

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders (EDs) affect an increasing proportion of young women in western countries. Psychometric questionnaires represent valuable tools to investigate various and critical areas directly involved in the pathogenesis of EDS and to support diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. Methods: 162 young women (16–35 years old) seeking diettherapy were recruited. We classified subjects in normal eating behaviour (NEB) (n=87), binge eating disorder (BED) (n=12) and bulimic EDNOS (Eating Disorders not Otherwise Specified) (n=63). The SCOFF, Eating Attitudes Test (EAT 26) and Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) were administered. Body mass index (BMI) was utilised to assess the nutritional status. An analysis of the reliability and validity (sensitivity and specificity) of the SCOFF, EAT 26 and TFEQ was performed. Results: Body mass index (BMI) of NEB, BED and bulimic EDNOS was 27.7, 35 and 31.1, respectively. BED showed the highest values at the dishinibition, hunger and food preoccupation scales but, conversely, they were the least restrained group. The SCOFF was significantly associated with the dishinibition (r=0.31), hunger (0.31), dieting (r=0.34) and food preoccupation scales (r=0.34). The reliability analysis showed that the SCOFF, EAT 26 and TFEQ had a Cronbach alpha of 0.47, 0.85 and 0.75, respectively. The ROC curves identified cut off points of 3, 10 and 25 as the best compromise between specificity and sensitivity for the SCOFF, EAT 26 and TFEQ, respectively. Conclusions: The SCOFF is a valuable tool for the screening of abnormal eating behaviours but the diagnosis should be always confirmed and supported by the administration of other questionnaires and structured interviews. We have also confirmed the high reliability of the EAT 26 and TFEQ, even though the utilisation of these questionnaires has generated some issues about their application in populations characterised by loss of control and overeating episodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fairburn C.G., Harrison P.J.: Eating disorders. Lancet, 361, 407–416, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin B.S.: Prevention research in eating disorders: Theory and new directions. Psychol. Med., 30, 1249–1262, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American Psychiatric Association Work Group on Eating Disorders. Practice guideline for the treatment of patient with eating disorders (Revision). Am J Psychiatry (Suppl.) 157, 1–39, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Dietetic Association, Nutrition Intervention in the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa and Eating Disorders non Otherwise Specified (EDNOS). J Am Dietet. Assoc., 101, 810–819, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garner D.M., Olmsted M.P., Bohr Y., Garfinkel P.E.: The eating attitude test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol. Med., 12, 871–878, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stunkard A.J., Messick S.: The three factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J. Psychosom. Res., 29, 71–83, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan J.F., Reid F., Lacey J.H:. The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ, 319, 1467–1468, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luck A.J., Morgan F.J., Reid F., O’Brien A., Brunton J., Price C., Perry L., Lacey H.J.: The SCOFF questionnaire and clinical interview for eating disorders in general practice: comparative study. BMJ, 325, 755–756, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole T.J. Bellizzi M.C., Flegal K.M., Dietz W.H.: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ, 320, 1–6, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), Task Force on DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

  11. Perry L., Morgan J., Reid F., Brunton J., O’Brien A., Luck A., Lacey H.: Screening for symptoms of eating disorders: reliability of the SCOFF screening tool with written compared to oral delivery. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 32, 466–472, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Conti L.: Repertorio delle scale di valutazione in psichiatria. SEE, Florence, Italy, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stunkard A.J., Wadden T.: 1990. Restrained eating and human obesity. Nutr. Rev., 48, 78–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garfinkel P.: The eating attitude test. Twenty-five years later. Eat. Weight Disord., 6, 1–24, 2001.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe M.R.: The effects of dieting on eating behaviour: a three-factor model. Psychol. Bull., 114, 100–121, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe M.R., Whitlow J.W., Bellwoar V.: Eating regulation: the role of restraint, dieting and weight. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 10, 461–471, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuschl R.J.: From dietary restraint to binge eating: some theoretical considerations. Appetite, 14, 105–109, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dingemans A.E., Bruna M.J., van Furth E.F.: Binge eating disorder: a review. Int. J. Obes., 26, 299–307, 2002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Franko D., Omori M.: Subclinical eating disorders in adolescent women: a test of the continuity hypothesis and its psychological correlates. J. Adolesc., 22, 389–396, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gleaves D.H., Lowe M.R., Snow A.C., Green B.A., Murphy-Eberenz K.P.: Continuity and discontinuity models of bulimia nervosa: a taxometric investigation. J Abnorm. Psychol., 109, 56–68, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Boschi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siervo, M., Boschi, V., Papa, A. et al. Application of the SCOFF, Eating Attitude Test 26 (EAT 26) and Eating Inventory (TFEQ) questionnaires in young women seeking diet-therapy. Eat Weight Disord 10, 76–82 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327528

Key words

Navigation