Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 85–93 | Cite as

Muscle training for bone strength

  • Harri SuominenEmail author
Review Article

Abstract

The main function of bone is to provide the mechanical integrity for locomotion and protection; accordingly, bone mass and architecture are adjusted to control the strains produced by mechanical load and muscular activity. Age-related patterns involve peak bone mass during growth, a plateau in adulthood, and bone loss during aging. The decline in bone mass and structural integrity results in increased risk of fractures, particularly in post-menopausal women. Athletes competing in strength and power events, such as weight-lifting and jumping, have superior bone mass and structure compared with their untrained counterparts in all age groups. Exercise seems to be most effective during rapid growth, the average gain in bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) in controlled trials being of the order of 2–5% per year. The net gain of BMD after exercise interventions among older people is modest, at a level of 1–3% per year, but it is not clear whether positive effects can be maintained over a longer time. Although aerobic exercise is important in maintaining overall health, the resistance type of muscle training may be more applicable to the basic rules of bone adaptation and site-specific effects of exercise, have more favorable effects in maintaining or improving bone mass and architecture, and be safe and feasible for older people. It has been suggested that there is an opportunity for resistance training, for improved effects on BMD in post-menopausal women in bones which have less daily loading. In addition to BMC and BMD, bone geometry and mass distribution may also change as a result of training and other treatment, such as hormonal replacement therapy, thereby further improving bone strength and reducing fracture risk. Appropriate training regimens may reduce the risk of falls and the severity of fall-related injuries, and also constitute potential therapy to improve functional ability and the quality of life in osteoporotic patients. However, further research is needed on dose-response relationships between exercise and bone strength, the feasibility of high-load, high-speed and impact-type of physical training, and the risks and benefits of intensive exercise in elderly individuals.

Keywords

Aging bone exercise skeletal muscle strength 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Einhorn TA. The bone organ system: form and function. In Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996: 3–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahn K, McKay H, Kannus P, Bailey D, Wark J, Bennel K. Physical activity and bone health. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maggi S, Lauretani F, Ferrucci L, et al. The quality of bone: a “magic natural alloy”. Aging Clin Exp Res 2004; 16: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slemenda CW, Christian JC, Williams CJ, Norton JA, Johnston CC Jr. Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates. J Bone Miner Res 1991; 6: 561–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willing MC, Torner JC, Burns TL, et al. Gene polymorphisms, bone mineral density and bone mineral content in young children: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 650–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harridge S, Suominen H. Physical activity in the elderly. In Kjaer M, Krogsgaard M, Magnusson P, Roos H, Takala T, Woo S L-Y, eds. Textbook of sports medicine. Basic science and clinical aspects of sports injury and physical activity. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 337–54.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ponder SW, McCormick DP, Fawcett HD, Palmer JL, McKernan MG, Brouhard BH. Spinal bone mineral density in children aged 5.00 through 11.99 years. Am J Dis Child 1990; 144: 1346–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu PW, Briody JN, Ogle GD, et al. Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1451–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA. A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1672–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bass S, Delmas PD, Pearce G, Hendrich E, Tabensky A, Seeman E. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 795–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molgaard C, Thomsen BL, Michaelsen KF. Whole body bone mineral accretion in healthy children and adolescents. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81: 10–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bailey DA. The Saskatchewan Pediatric Bone Mineral Accrual Study: bone mineral acquisition during the growing years. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18 (Suppl 3): S191–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Q, Alen M, Nicholson P, et al. Growth patterns at distal radius and tibial shaft in pubertal girls: a 2-year longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 954–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seeman E. Clinical review 137: Sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocr Metab 2001; 86: 4576–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu PW, Cowell CT, LLoyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R. Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5–27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996; 81: 1586–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoenau E, Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F. Gender-specific pubertal changes in volumetric cortical bone mineral density at the proximal radius. Bone 2002; 31: 110–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E. Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Q, Nicholson PH, Suuriniemi M, et al. Relationship of sex hormones to bone geometric properties and mineral density in early pubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 1698–703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang Q, Alen M, Nicholson PH, et al. Differential effects of sex hormones on peri- and endocortical bone surfaces in pubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 277–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, Wassmer G, Manz F. Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical bone area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 1095–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferretti JL, Cointry GR, Capozza RF, Frost HM. Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteoporoses. Mech Ageing Dev 2003; 124: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forwood MR, Bailey DA, Beck TJ, Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Uusi-Rasi K. Sexual dimorphism of the femoral neck during the adolescent growth spurt: a structural analysis. Bone 2004; 35: 973–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bailey DA, Wedge JH, McCulloch RG, Martin AD, Bernhardson SC. Epidemiology of fractures of the distal end of the radius in children as associated with growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1225–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blimkie CJ, Lefevre J, Beunen GP, Renson R, Dequeker J, Van Damme P. Fractures, physical activity, and growth velocity in adolescent Belgian boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 801–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ensrud KE, Palermo L, Black DM, Cauley J, et al. Hip and calcaneal bone loss increase with advancing age: longitudinal results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1778–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA. Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. BMJ 1994; 309: 691–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH, Rannevik G, Karlsson MK. Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 327–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Riggs BL, Melton III LJ, Robb RA, et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 1945–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng S, Suominen H, Sakari-Rantala R, Laukkanen P, Avikainen V, Heikkinen E. Calcaneal bone mineral density predicts fracture occurrence. A 5-year follow-up study in elderly people. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1075–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L. Zone-dependent changes in human vertebral trabecular bone: clinical implications. Bone 2002; 30: 664–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Duan Y, Beck TJ, Wang X-F, Seeman E. Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1766–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Filardi S, Zebaze RM, Duan Y, Edmonds J, Beck T, Seeman E. Femoral neck fragility in women has its structural and biomechanical basis established by periosteal modeling during growth and endocortical remodeling during aging. Osteoporos Int 2004; 15: 103–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lanyon L, Armstrong V, Ong D, Zaman G, Price J. Is estrogen receptor alpha key to controlling bones’ resistance to fracture? J Endocrinol 2004; 182: 183–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Riggs BL, Melton III LJ. The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. N. Engl J Med 1992; 327: 620–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cooper C, Melton III LJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Trends Edocrinol Metab 1992; 3: 224–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wolff J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: Hirschwald, 1892.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Frost HM. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal. Anat Rec 1987; 219: 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Forwood MR, Turner CH. Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. Bone 1995; 17: 197S–205S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lanyon LE. Using functional loading to influence bone mass and architecture: objectives, mechanisms, and relationship with estrogen of the mechanically adaptive process in bone. Bone 1996; 18: 37S–43S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Turner RT. Mechanical signalling in the development of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Lupus 1999; 8: 388–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Frost HM. On the estrogen-bone relationship and postmenopausal bone loss: A new model. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1473–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Taaffe DR, Cooper CS, Holloway L, Duret C, Marcus R. Lack of association of anabolic hormone status and muscle strength with regional and whole body bone mineral density in healthy men aged 60–79 years. Aging Clin Exp Res 1999; 11:4–11.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Burr DB. Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1547–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Frost HM. On our age-related bone loss: insights from a new paradigm. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1539–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lu TW, Taylor SJ, O’Connor JJ, Walker PS. Influence of muscle activity on the forces in the femur: an in vivo study. J Biomech 1997; 30: 1101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Munih M, Kralj A, Bajd T. Bending moments in lower extremity bones for two standing postures. J Biomed Eng 1992; 14: 293–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Duncan R, Turner CH. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int 1995; 57: 344–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hsieh YF, Turner CH. Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 918–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burr DB, Milgrom C, Fyhrie D, et al. In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. Bone 1996; 18: 405–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone 1998; 23: 399–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Burr DB, Robling AG, Turner CH. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone 2002; 30: 781–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH. Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 1545–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Turner CH, Robling AG. Designing exercise regiments to increase bone strength. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003; 31: 45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Suominen H. Bone mineral density and long term exercise: an overview of cross-sectional athlete studies. Sports Med 1993; 16: 316–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heinonen A, Oja P, Kannus P, et al. Bone mineral density in female athletes representing sports with different loading characteristics of the skeleton. Bone 1995; 17: 197–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Taaffe DR, Suominen H, Ollikainen S, Cheng S. Calcaneal bone mineral and ultrasound attenuation in male athletes exposed to weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing activity. A cross-sectional report. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2001; 41: 243–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kyrolainen H, Perttunen J, Kannus P. Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers’ lower limb. Bone 2001; 29: 279–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Heinonen A, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Oja P, Vuori I. Site-specific skeletal response to long-term weight training seems to be attributable to principal loading modality: a pQCT study of female weightlifters. Calcif Tissue Int 2002; 70: 469–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nikander R, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Kannus P. Femoral neck structure in adult female athletes subjected to different loading modalities. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 520–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Huddleston AL, Rockwell D, Kulund DN, Harrison RB. Bone mass in lifetime tennis athletes. JAMA 1980; 244: 1107–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Suominen H, Rahkila P. Bone mineral density of the calcaneus in 70- to 81-yr-old male athletes and a population sample. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 1227–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Welch JM, Rosen CJ. Older women track and field athletes have enhanced calcaneal stiffness. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 871–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nichols JF, Palmer JE, Levy SS. Low bone mineral density in highly trained male master cyclists. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: 644–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, Svedstrom E, Hakola P, Heinonen OJ, Viikari J. Physical activity and bone mineral acquisition in peripubertal girls. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000; 10: 236–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang QJ, Suominen H, Nicholson PH, et al. Influence of physical activity and maturation status on bone mass and geometry in early pubertal girls. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005; 15: 100–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, et al. Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 27–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievänen H, et al. Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 310–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Suuriniemi M, Mahonen A, Kovanen V, et al. Association between exercise and pubertal BMD is modulated by estrogen receptor alpha genotype. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 1758–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Heinonen A, Sievänen H, Kannus P, Oja P, Pasanen M, Vuori I. High-impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-month controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 1010–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    MacKelvie KJ, McKay HA, Khan KM, Crocker PR: A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls. J Pediatr 2001; 139: 501–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM: Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 148–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Petit MA, McKay HA, MacKelvie KJ, Heinonen A, Khan KM, Beck TJ. A randomized school-based jumping intervention confers site and maturity-specific benefits on bone structural properties in girls: a hip structural analysis study. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 363–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, Carlson JS, Wark JD. Prospective 10-month exercise intervention in pre-menarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1453–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, et al. Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: Changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: A controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 1814–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    McKay HA, Petit MA, Schutz RW, Prior JC, Barr SI, Khan KM. Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 2000; 136: 156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kohrt WM, Bloomfield SA, Little KD, Nelson ME, Yingling VR. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1985–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HC, Kostense PJ, Twisk JW. The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1999; 9: 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Exercise and bone mineral density in men: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88: 1730–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wallace BA, Cumming RG. Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 2000; 67: 10–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Resistance training and bone mineral density in women. A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 65–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vuori IM. Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: S551–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Asikainen TM, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Miilunpalo S. Exercise for health for early postmenopausal women: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med 2004; 34: 753–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bonaiuti D, Shea B, Iovine R, et al. Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002: CD000333.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen H, et al. Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 1996; 348: 1343–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bassey EJ, Ramsdale SJ. Increase in femoral bone mineral density in young women following high impact exercise. Osteoporos Int 1994; 4: 72–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Vainionpaa A, Korpelainen R, Leppaluoto J, Jamsa T. Effects of high-impact exercise on bone mineral density: a randomized controlled trial in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 191–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Pajamaki I, et al. Estrogen deposits extra mineral into bones of female rats in puberty, but simultaneously seems to suppress the responsiveness of female skeleton to mechanical loading. Bone 2003; 32: 642–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Jarvinen TL, Kannus P, Pajamaki I, et al. Estrogen deposits extra mineral into bones of female rats in puberty, but simultaneously seems to suppress the responsiveness of female skeleton to mechanical loading. Bone 2003; 32: 642–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Winters-Stone KM, Snow CM. Musculoskeletal response to exercise is greatest in women with low initial values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1691–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Buhl KM, Jacobs CR, Turner RT, Evans GL, Farrell PA, Donahue HJ. Aged bone displays an increased responsiveness to low-intensity resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 1359–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P, Cheng S, et al. Effect of alendronate and exercise on bone and physical performance of postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Bone 2003; 33: 132–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Korpelainen R, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Heikkinen J, Vaananen K, Korpelainen J. Effect of impact exercise on bone mineral density in elderly women with low BMD: a population-based randomized controlled 30-month intervention. Osteoporos Int 2006; 17: 109–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Layne JE, Nelson ME. The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 25–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, Trice I, Greenberg RA, Evans WJ. Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1994; 272: 1909–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R. Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific and load-dependent. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11: 218–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Kerr D, Ackland T, Maslen B, Morton A, Prince R. Resistance training over 2 years increases bone mass in calcium-replete postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 175–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Vincent KR, Braith RW. Resistance exercise and bone turnover in elderly men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 17–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pruitt LA, Taaffe DR, Marcus R. Effects of a one-year high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training program on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1788–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Bemben DA, Fetters NL, Bemben MG, Nabavi N, Koh ET. Musculoskeletal responses to high- and low-intensity resistance training in early postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1949–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Daly RM, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Jolley D, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ. Does high-intensity resistance training maintain bone mass during moderate weight loss in older overweight adults with type 2 diabetes? Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1703–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Marx J. Coming to grips with bone loss. Science 2004; 305: 1420–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Prince RL, Smith M, Dick IM, et al. Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A comparative study of exercise, calcium supplementation, and hormone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 1189–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Kohrt WM, Snead DB, Slatopolsky E, Birge SJ Jr. Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 1303–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Kohrt WM, Birge SJ Jr. Differential effects of estrogen treatment on bone mineral density of the spine, hip, wrist and total body in late postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 150–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Heikkinen J, Kyllonen E, Kurttila-Matero E, et al. HRT and exercise: effects on bone density, muscle strength and lipid metabolism. A placebo controlled 2-year prospective trial on two estrogen-progestin regimens in healthy postmenopausal women. Maturitas 1997; 26: 139–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kohrt WM, Ehsani AA, Birge SJ Jr. HRT preserves increases in bone mineral density and reductions in body fat after a supervised exercise program. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84: 1506–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Cheng S, Sipilä S, Taaffe DR, Puolakka J, Suominen H. Change in bone mass distribution induced by hormone replacement therapy and high-impact physical exercise in post-menopausal women. Bone 2002; 31: 126–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Bergstrom I, Freyschuss B, Landgren BM. Physical training and hormone replacement therapy reduce the decrease in bone mineral density in perimenopausal women: a pilot study. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 823–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Sipilä S, Taaffe DR, Cheng S, Toivanen JT, Suominen H. Effects of hormone replacement therapy and high-impact physical exercise on skeletal muscle in postmenopausal women: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Sci 2001; 101: 147–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Lemoine S, Granier P, Tiffoche C, Rannou-Bekono F, Thieulant ML, Delamarche P. Estrogen receptor alpha mRNA in human skeletal muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 439–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Fiatarone MA, O’Neill EF, Ryan ND, et al. Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1769–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Sipilä S, Suominen H. Effects of strength and endurance training on thigh and leg muscle mass and composition in elderly women. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78: 334–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Sipila S, Multanen J, Kallinen M, Era P, Suominen H. Effects of strength and endurance training on isometric muscle strength and walking speed in elderly women. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 156: 457–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Carter ND, Kannus P, Khan KM. Exercise in the prevention of falls in older people: a systematic literature review examining the rationale and the evidence. Sports Med 2001; 31: 427–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Englund U, Littbrand H, Sondell A, Pettersson U, Bucht G. A 1-year combined weight-bearing training program is beneficial for bone mineral density and neuromuscular function in older women. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1117–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations