Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial inequality in municipal solid waste disposal across regions in developing countries

  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The regional inequalities in socio-economical characteristics such as income, population density, age composition, unemployment rate and the education level may bring about variation in waste generation, recycling and collection. Using environmental Kuznets curve, the factors affecting municipal solid waste disposal are examined. The results demonstrate that an inverted N-shaped curve executes on municipal solid waste disposal for all regions. As personal disposable income increases, per capita municipal solid waste disposed firstly declines, then grows at the second stage and finally decreases again. All the explanatory variables including economic factors, social characteristics and geographical barriers are found to influence municipal solid waste disposal significantly. Each person increase in population density leads to an increase in municipal solid waste disposed by approximately 1.17 ×10−4 kg/day. Each percent increase in age composition results in a decrease in municipal solid waste disposed by approximately 0.0224 kg/day; in the unemployment rate causes a decrease of 0.0901 kg/day and in the education level results in a decrease of 0.01556 kg/day. In general, municipal solid waste disposal starts to increase at the first turning point of personal disposable income NT$ 198,000 (about US$ 6,280) and to decrease at the second point of NT$ 389,000 (about US$ 12,350) for all regions (pooled data). The rural regions, however, cannot support the inverted N-shaped curve by the ‘reduced form’ while urban regions have a significant outcome. This result implies that income can only explain a portion of variation while other social and geographical factors contribute a lot to identify the variation in municipal solid waste disposal between urban and rural regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bamberg, S., (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J. Environ. Psycho., 23(1), 21–32 (12 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. P.; Greene, T. C.; Fisher, J. D.; Baum, A., (2001). Environmental psychology. 5th Ed., Orlando, F. L., Harcourt College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerstaff, K.; Walker, G., (2001). Public understandings of air pollution: the ‘localisation’ of environmental risk. Global Environ. Chang., 11(2), 133–145 (13 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B. R.; Taylor, M. S., (2004). Trade, growth and the environment. J. Econ. Lit., 42(1), 7–71 (65 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DGBAS, (2008). http://61.60.106.82/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp.

  • Diekmann, A.; Franzen, A., (1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environ. Behav., 31(4), 540–549 (10 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda, S., (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Eco. Econ., 49(2), 431–455 (25 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domina, T.; Koch, K., (2002). Convenience and frequency of recycling: Implications for including textiles in curbside recycling programs. Environ. Behav., 34(2), 216–238 (25 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  • Do Valle, P. O.; Reis, E.; Menezes, J.; Rebelo, E., (2004). Behavioral determinants of household recycling participation. Environ. Behav., 36(4), 505–540 (34 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E.; Gallup, J. G. H.; Gallup, A. M., (1993). Of global concern: Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment, 35(9), 6–17 (12 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E.; Mertig, A. G., (1995). Global concern for the environment: Is affluence a prerequisite? J. Soc. Issues, 51(4), 122–137 (16 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebreo, A.; Hershey, J.; Vining, J., (1999). Reducing solid waste: Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environ. Behav., 31(1), 107–135 (29 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, G., (2001 ). Altruistic, egoistic, and normative effects on curbside recycling. Environ. Behav., 33(6), 733–764 (32 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firat, A. F.; Dholakia, N., (1998). Consuming people. From political economy to theaters of consumption. Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, B.; Getzner, M., (2003). Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Eco. Econ., 45(1), 133–148 (16 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti, M.; Lanza, A., (2005). Desperately seeking environmental Kuznets. Environ. Model. Softw., 20(11), 1379–1388 (10 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W. T.; Levinson, A.; Wilson, D. M., (2002). Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets Curve. Rev. Econ. Stat., 84(3), 541–551 (11 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, O., (2002). Coping style and three psychological measures associated with environmentally responsible behavior. Soc. Behav. Personal., 30(7), 661–669 (9 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. E., (1998). A household level environmental Kuznets Curve. Econ. Lett., 59(2), 269–273 (5 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, A.; Riddel, M., (2010). A further inquiry into the Pollution Haven Hypothesis and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecol. Econ., 69(4), 905–919 (15 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G.; Tole, L., (1999). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? J. Develop. Econ., 58(1), 231–244 (14 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen, M.; Moore, M., (2007). Private provision of environmental public goods: Household participation in green-electricity programs. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 53(1), 1–16 (16 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, C.; Berg, P. E. O.; Clarkson, P., (2003). The development of systems for property close collection of recyclables: Experiences from Sweden and England. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 38(1), 39–57 (19 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S.; Oates, C., (2003). Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 39(4), 369–385 (27 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlevede, B.; Verbeke, Y.; De Clercq, M., (2006). The EKC for SO2: Does firm size matter? Ecol. Econ., 59(4), 451–461 (11 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogundiran, O. O.; Afolabi, T. A., (2008). Assessment of the physicochemical parameters and heavy metals’ toxicity of leachates from municipal solid waste open dumpsite. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5(2), 243–250 (8 pages).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattnaik, S.; Reddy, M. V., (2010). Assessment of municipal solid waste management in Puducherry (Pondicherry), India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54(8), 512–520 (9 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropke, I., (1999). The dynamics of willingness to consume. Ecol. Econ., 28(3), 399–420 (22 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salhofer, S.; Isaac, N., (2002). Importance of public relations in recycling strategies: Principles and case studies. Environ. Manage., 30(1), 68–76 (9 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott D., (1999). Equal opportunity, unequal results: Determinants of household recycling intensity. Environ. Behav., 31(2), 267–290 (24 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skonhoft, A.; Solem, H., (2001). Economic growth and land-use changes: The declining amount of wilderness land in Norway. Ecol. Econ., 37(2), 289–301 (13 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J., (2005). Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econ. Lit., 43(2), 392–436 (45 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. I.; Common, M. S., (2001). Is there an environmental Kuznets Curve for sulphur? J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 41(2), 162–178 (17 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, M. A.; Cordell, H. K., (1997). The effect of respondent characteristics on general environmental attitude-behavior correspondence. Environ. Behav., 29(5), 618–637 (20 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teisl, M. F.; Roe, B.; Hicks, R. L., (2002). Can eco-labels tune a market? Evidence from dolphin-safe labeling. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 43(3), 339–359 (21 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet, M.; Phillips, P. S.; Read, A. D., (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 41(3), 191–214 (24 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras, M.; Boyce, J. K., (1998). Income, inequality and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ., 25(2), 147–160 (14 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinodhini, R.; Narayanan, M., (2008). Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in organs of fresh water fish Cyprinus carpio (Common carp). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 5(2), 179–182 (4 pages).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C. M.; Makela, E., (1998). Motivations and behaviors that support recycling. J. Environ. Psychol., 18(4), 373–386 (14 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I. D.; Kelly, J., (2003). Greenwaste collection and the public’s recycling behaviour in the Borough of Wyre, England. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 38(2), 139–159 (21 pages).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman, A. U., (2010). Comparative study of municipal solid waste treatment technologies using life cycle assessment method. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 7(2), 225–234 (10 pages).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. C. Chen Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, C.C. Spatial inequality in municipal solid waste disposal across regions in developing countries. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 7, 447–456 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326154

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326154

Keywords

Navigation