Treatment of polluted river water by a gravel contact oxidation system constructed under riverbed

  • D. F. JuangEmail author
  • W. P. Tsai
  • W. K. Liu
  • J. H. Lin


The objective of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficiency of a gravel contact oxidation treatment system which was newly constructed under the riverbed of Nan-men Stream located at the Shin Chu City of Taiwan. The influent and effluent water samples were taken periodically for the analyses of pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, total suspended solids, five-day biological oxygen demand, NH4 +-N. The results showed that the average removal rates of five-day biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids and NH4 +-N were 33.6% (between −6.7% and 82.1%), 56.3% (between −83.0% and 93.4%) and 10.7% (between −13.0% and 83.3%), respectively. The calculated mean first order reaction rate constant for five-day biological oxygen demand was 4.58/day with a standard deviation of 4.07/day and for NH4 +-N was 2.15/day with a standard deviation of 5.68/day. Therefore, it could be said that this gravel-contact-oxidation system could effectively remove biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, and NH4 +-N in river water at a relatively short hydraulic retention time, although its pollutant treatment efficiency was not quite stable. However, to reach better or more stable treatment efficiency, aeration might sometimes be necessary to increase the dissolved oxygen in influent river water. And, longer hydraulic retention time of the system might also be required to increase NH4 +-N removal efficiency.


Ecological engineering gravel contact oxidation treatment system loading rate packed-bed reactor water quality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergen, S. D.; Bolton, S. M.; Fridley, J. L., (2001). Design principles for ecological engineering. Ecol. Eng., 18(2), 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clesceri, L. S.; Greenberg, A. E.; Eaton, A. D., (2001). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Federation (WEF).Google Scholar
  3. Cooper, P. F.; Findlater, B. C., (1990). Constructed wetlands in water pollution control, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Coveney, M. F.; Stites, D. L.; Lowe, E. F.; Battoe, L. E.; Conrow, R., (2002). Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration. Ecol. Eng., 19(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crite, R. W.; Reed, S. C.; Bastin, R. K., (2000). Land treatment system for municipal and industrial wastes, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Dahab, M. F.; Surampalli, R. Y., (2001). Subsurface-flow constructed wetlands treatment in the plains: five years of experience. Water Sci. Tech., 44(11–12), 375–380.Google Scholar
  7. Dahab, M. F.; Surampalli, R. Y.; Liu, W., (2001). Performance modeling of subsurface-flow constructed wetlands systems. Water Sci. Tech., 44(11–12), 231–235.Google Scholar
  8. Fan, C.; Wang, W. S., (2006). Evaluation of efficiency of the pebble-based contact chamber technique applied to the treatment of domestic sewage. J. Environ. Protect., (in Chinese). 29(2), 91–102.Google Scholar
  9. Hamersley, M. R.; Howes, B. L.; White, D. S.; Johnke, S.; Young, D.; Peterson, S. B.; Teal, J. M., (2001). Nitrogen balance and cycling in an ecologically engineered septage treatment system. Ecol. Eng., 18(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Juang, D. F.; Chen, P. C., (2007). Treatment of polluted river water by a new constructed wetland, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech., 4(4), 481–488.Google Scholar
  11. Kadlec, R. H.; Knight, R. L., (1996). Treatment wetlands, Lewis Publisher, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  12. Kemp, M. C.; George, D. B., (1997). Subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating municipal wastewater for nitrogen transformation and removal, Water Environ. Res., 69(7), 1254–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kivaisi, A. K. (2001). The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review, Ecol. Eng., 16(4), 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lau, Y. L., (1990). Modeling the consumption of dissolved contaminants by biofilm periphyton in open-channel, Water Res., 24(10), 1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lau, Y.L.; Liu, D., (1993). Effect of flow on biofilm accumulation in open channels, Water Res., 27(3), 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leu, H. G.; Ouyang, C. F.; Su, J. L., (1996). Effects of flow velocity changes on nitrogen transport and conversion in an open channel flow, Water Res., 30(9), 2065–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leu, H. G.; Lee, C. D.; Ouyang, C. F.; Pai, T. Y., (1998). A modified water quality model for predicting BOD and DO variations in a shallow polluted channel, Environ. Tech., 19(9), 933–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, W.; Dahab, M. F.; Surampalli, R. Y., (2005). Nitrogen transformations modeling in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Water Environ. Res., 77(3), 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luederitz, V.; Eckert, E.; Lange-Weber, M.; Lange, A.; Gersberg, R. M., (2001). Nutrient removal efficiency and resource economics of vertical flow and horizontal flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng., 18(2), 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reed, S. C., (2000). Land treatment systems for municipal and industrial wastes, McGraw-Hill, ISBN: 0070610401.Google Scholar
  21. Reed, S. C.; Brown, D. S., (1995). Subsurface flow wetlands — a performance evaluation, Water Environ. Res., 67(2), 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reed. S. C.; Middlebrooks, E. J.; Crites, R. W., (1995). Natural systems for waste management and treatment, 2nd. Ed, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  23. Spieles, D. J.; Mitsch, W. J., (1999). The effect of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands: a comparison of low- and high-nutrient riverine systems, Ecol. Eng., 14(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanner, C. C., (1994). Treatment of dairy farm wastewaters in horizontal and up-flow gravel-bed constructed wetlands, Water Sci. Tech., 29(4), 85–93.Google Scholar
  25. Tsai, W. P., (2007). Benefit Evaluation for improvement of water quality of rivers using a gravel-packed reactor, Master’s Thesis (in Chinese), National Central University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  26. USEPA, (2000). Design Manual: Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-625/R-99-010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  27. Varrier, S. M.; Dahab, M. F., (2001). Start-up performance of subsurface-flow constructed wetland for domestic wastewater treatment. Environ. Tech., 22(5), 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vymazal, J., (2002). The use of sub-surface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecol. Eng., 18(5), 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu, S. C.; Tsao, C. W.; Lin, C. Y.; Chen, C. C., (2006). Relationship between engineering design parameters and water quality for constructed cobble bed in Guandu. J. Environ. Protec. (in Chinese), 29(2), 73–90.Google Scholar
  30. Zhen, H. X., (2002), Ecological engineering techniques for lake restoration in Japan (Oct.29th., 2001-Apr. 27th.), Individual Training Ecological Engineering Purification System Development, 171–181.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Islamic Azad University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. F. Juang
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. P. Tsai
    • 2
  • W. K. Liu
    • 3
  • J. H. Lin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Business AdministrationMeiho Institute of TechnologyKaohsiungTaiwan
  2. 2.Section ThreeBureau of Environmental Protection, Hsin-Chu Municipal GovernmentHsin Chu CityTaiwan
  3. 3.DHV Planetek Co., LtdKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations