Abstract
Observed TEC values during the disturbances cannot be adequately reproduced by integrating available model electron density profile along the ionospheric heights. It is shown that TEC and NmF2 disturbances do not coincide for ∼ 50% of days (enhanced TEC with normal NmF2 or reduced NmF2 with normal TEC). In such cases presence of an additional layer between the bottomside and topside ionosphere is assumed; its thickness may range from zero to 300 km. Available ionospheric models should be revised inserting broad peak of ionization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bilitza D 1990: International Reference Ionosphere, IRI-90. Rep. NSSDC/WDC-A R and S, 90–22, Greenbelt, USA
Bradley P A 1995: PRIME (Prediction and Retrospective Ionospheric Modelling over Europe). COST238, Final Report, ECSC-EEC-EAEC, Brussels
Das Gupta A., Basu S, Bhar J N, Bhattacharya J C 1975: J. Geoph. Res., 80, 699.
Davies K, Liu X M 1991: Radio Sci., 26, 997.
Decker DT, Anderson D N, Preble A J 1997: Radio Sci., 32, 2003.
Huang Chun-Ming 1974: Radio Sci., 9, 519.
Gulyaeva T., Spalla P 1995: Annali di Geophysica, 38, 429.
Jayachandran B, Balachandran Nair R., Balan N, Rao P B 1995: J. Atm. Terr. Phys., 57, 1599.
Kishcha P V 1995: Adv. Space Res., 15, 55.
Klobuchar J A, Leitinger R 1993: In: Proc. of COST238/PRIME Workshop, Part 1, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, 13.
Su Y Z., Bailey G J., Balan N 1995: J. Atm. Terr. Phys., 54, 433.
Watanabe Sh., Takahashi T., Oya H., Oyama K I 1995: Table of electron density at 600 km altitude during 1981–1982 in the equatorial region. ISAS RN 579, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Tokyo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gulyaeva, T.L. TEC Residual Slab-Thickness between Bottomside and Topside Ionosphere. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 32, 355–363 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325506
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325506