Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 42–46 | Cite as

Short Berg Balance Scale — correlation to static and dynamic balance and applicability among the aged

  • Ulla Hohtari-KivimäkiEmail author
  • Marika Salminen
  • Tero Vahlberg
  • Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä
Original Article


Background and aims: To create a shorter version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and to assess correlations between short BBS and static and dynamic aspects of balance among community-dwelling aged with a self-reported history of falling. Methods: 519 (88%) subjects were included in the study, for whom BBS, and static and dynamic balance measurements were performed. Explanatory factor analysis was used to create a shorter version of the BBS. Static and dynamic balance was measured on a force platform. Correlations between the short BBS and static and dynamic balance were analysed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the short BBS. Results: Explanatory factory analysis produced two factors. Factor 1 consisted of nine items and factor 2 of four items of the BBS. One item of the original BBS was not loaded in these factors. The short BBS (BBS-9) was formed of factor 1. It correlated significantly with the original BBS, and had moderate correlations with static and dynamic aspects of balance (p<0.001). The high scores of BBS-9 were associated with better static and dynamic balance. BBS-9 demonstrated as good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha [α]=0.69) as the original BBS (α=0.74). Conclusions: Results support the applicability of BBS-9 in assessing functional balance among the aged with quite good physical function. However, more studies are needed to verify applicability to other samples and to assess cut-off scores for BBS-9, to predict the likelihood of falling.

Key words

Aged balance Berg Balance Scale falls 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 812–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiu AY, Au-Yeung SS, Lo SK. A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 45–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing 2006; 35: S37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scott V, Votova K, Scanlan A, Close J. Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings. Age Ageing 2007; 36: 130–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J. The balance scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehab Med 1995; 27: 27–36.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Southard V, Dave M, Davis MG, Blanco J, Hofferber A. The multiple tasks test as a predictor of falls in older adults. Gait Posture 2005; 22: 351–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83: S7–11.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, Speechley M. Use of the Berg Balance Scale for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people: a prospective study. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 449–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frykberg GE, Lindmark B, Lanshammar H, Borg J. Correlation between clinical assessment and force plate measurement of postural control after stroke. J Rehab Med 2007; 39: 448–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berg K, Maki BE, Williams JI, Holliday PJ, Wood-Dauphinee SL. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1073–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chou C-Y, Chien C-W, Hsueh I-P, Sheu C-F, Wang C-H, Hsieh C-L. Developing a short form of the Berg Balance Scale for people with stroke. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 195–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sjösten N, Salonoja M, Piirtola M et al. A risk-based multifactorial fall prevention program in the home-dwelling aged: a randomized controlled trial. Public Health 2007; 121: 308–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Era P, Schroll M, Ytting H, Gause-Nilsson I, Heikkinen E, Steen P. Postural balance and its sensory-motor correlates in 75-year-old men and women: a cross-national comparative study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1996; 51: M53–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berg K, Wood-Dauphineé S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 304–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulla Hohtari-Kivimäki
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Marika Salminen
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tero Vahlberg
    • 5
  • Sirkka-Liisa Kivelä
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Clinical Medicine, Family MedicineUniversity of TurkuFinland
  2. 2.Satakunta Central HospitalPoriFinland
  3. 3.Härkätie Health CenterLietoFinland
  4. 4.Unit of Family MedicineTurku University HospitalTurkuFinland
  5. 5.Institute of Clinical Medicine, BiostatisticsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations