Classical Stroop effect in bulimia nervosa

  • S. Guillaume
  • F. Van den Eynde
  • N. Samarawickrema
  • H. Broadbent
  • E. Goodman-Smith
  • U. Schmidt
Brief Report

Abstract

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is a distressing condition. Its pathogenesis is not fully understood. Neurocognitive functioning, and particularly inhibitory control, is a potential biomarker that may improve our understanding of BN. A few small-scale studies have used the classical Stroop Colour Word Test (SCWT) in BN with contradictory findings. We examined SCWT performance in a large sample of people with BN (N=72), eating disorder not otherwise specified — bulimic type (N=43) and healthy controls (N=50). The results found no difference between groups on Stroop interference effect. These findings question the utility of the classical SCWT as an assessment tool in examining executive functioning in BN.

Keywords

Eating disorders neuropsychology neurocognition inhibition Stroop interference 

References

  1. 1.
    Steiger H, Bruce KR. Phenotypes, endophenotypes, and genotypes in bulimia spectrum eating disorders. Can J Psychiatry 2007; 52: 220–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van den Eynde F, Guillaume S, Broadbent H, et al. Neurocognition in bulimic eating disorders: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011; 124: 120–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claes L, Nederkoorn C, Vandereycken W, et al. Impulsiveness and lack of inhibitory control in eating disorders. Eat Behav 2006; 7: 196–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosval L, Steiger H, Bruce K, et al. Impulsivity in women with eating disorders: problem of response inhibition, planning, or attention? Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39: 590–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marsh R, Steinglass JE, Gerber AJ, et al. Deficient activity in the neural systems that mediate self-regulatory control in bulimia nervosa. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009; 66: 51–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stroop J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935: 643–62.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kemps E, Wilsdon A. Preliminary evidence for a role for impulsivity in cognitive disinhibition in bulimia nervosa. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2010; 32: 515–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fairburn CG, Cooper PJ, Cooper MJ, et al. Selective information processing in bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 1991; 10: 415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ben-Tovim DI, Walker M. Further evidence for the stroop test as a quantitative measure of psychopathology in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 1991; 10: 609–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ben-Tovim DI, Walker MK, Fok D, et al. An adaptation of the stroop test for measuring shape and food concerns in eating disorders: a quantitative measure of psychopathology. Int J Eat Disord 1989: 681–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brand M, Franke-Sievert C, Jacoby GE, et al. Neuropsychological correlates of decision making in patients with bulimia nervosa. Neuropsychology 2007; 21: 742–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper MJ, Anastasiades P, Fairburn CG. Selective processing of eating-, shape-, and weight-related words in persons with bulimia nervosa. J Abnorm Psychol 1992; 101: 352–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davidson EJ, Wright P. Selective processing of weight- and shape-related words in bulimia nervosa: use of a computerised Stroop test. Eat Behav 2002; 3: 261–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perpiñá C, Hemsley D, Treasure J, et al. Is the selective information processing of food and body words specific to patients with eating disorders? Int J Eat Disord 1993; 14: 359–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dobson KS, Dozois DJ. Attentional biases in eating disorders: a meta-analytic review of Stroop performance. Clin Psychol Rev 2004; 23: 1001–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crow SJ, Peterson CB, Swanson SA, et al. Increased mortality in bulimia nervosa and other eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166: 1342–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walsh BT, Sysko R. Broad categories for the diagnosis of eating disorders (BCD-ED): an alternative system for classification. Int J Eat Disord 2009; 42: 754–64.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Southgate L, Tchanturia K, Treasure J. Information processing bias in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res 2008; 160: 221–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carter FA, Bulik CM, McIntosh VV, et al. Changes on the stroop test following treatment: relation to word type, treatment condition, and treatment outcome among women with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2000; 28: 349–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Editrice Kurtis 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Guillaume
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Van den Eynde
    • 1
  • N. Samarawickrema
    • 1
  • H. Broadbent
    • 1
  • E. Goodman-Smith
    • 1
  • U. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating DisordersKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.CHU de MontpellierUniversité Montpellier I, InsermMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations