Skip to main content
Log in

Opinions and acceptability of common weight-loss practices

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A disconnect between research findings and public beliefs may lead to further dieting failures for consumers. Participants (N=300) were surveyed to determine their weight loss practices, opinions of weight loss methods, and rated the acceptability of popular and empirically validated weight loss programs. Dieting, the intention to diet, and the use of popular diets and diet aids were prevalent. There was a tendency for participants to view weight as more of a problem for society than themselves. The Behavioral Program was rated as most acceptable and Surgical Treatment least acceptable. However, participants were more likely to try a popular diet or supplement. It is vital for researchers and clinicians to improve communication with the public about efficacious weight loss programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. What are overweight and obesity? http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html 2006, September.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan RM. Should Medicare reimburse providers for weight loss interventions? Am Psychol 2007; 62: 217–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Latner JD, Wilson GT, Stunkard AJ, et al. Self-help and long-term behavior therapy for obesity. Behav Res Ther 2002; 40: 805–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttrop M, et al. Metaanalysis: Surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 547–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rucker D, Padwal R, Li SK, et al. Long term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight: Updated metaanalysis. BMJ 2007; 335: 1194–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Douketis JD, Macie C, Thabane L, et al. Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: Clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice. Int J Obes 2005; 29: 1153–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, et al. Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: Diets are not the answer. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell LH, Calvin III JE, Calvin JE Jr. Effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 234–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: A scientific review. Obes Res 2001; 9: 1S–40S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Celio CI, Luce KH, Bryson SW, et al. Use of diet pills and other dieting aids in a college population with high weight and shape concerns. Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39: 492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Newberry H, Beerman K, Duncan S, et al. Use of nonvitamin, nonmineral dietary supplements among college students. J Am Coll Health 2001; 50: 123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bish CL, Blanck HM, Maynard LM, et al. Health-related quality of life and weight loss among overweight and obese U.S. adults, 2001 to 2002. Obesity 2006; 14: 2042–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss EC, Galuska DA, Khan LK, et al. Weight control practices among U.S. adults 2001–2002. Am J Prev Med 2006; 31: 18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Timko CA, Perone J, Crossfield A. Are you currently on a diet? What respondents mean when they say “yes”. Eat Disord 2006; 14: 157–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dansinger ML, Augustin Gleason J, Griffith JL, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: A randomized trial. JAMA 2005; 293: 43–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Jenkins DJA. Health advantages and disadvantages of weight reducing diets: A computer analysis and critical review. J Am Coll Nutr 2000; 19: 578–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorm AF, Barney LJ, Christensen H, et al. Research on mental health literacy: What we know and what we still need to know. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2006; 40: 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kazdin AE. Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behav Ther 1981; 12: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckert TL, Hintze JM. Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology. Sch Psychol Q 2000; 15: 123–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miltenberger RG. Assessment of treatment acceptability: A review of the literature. Topics Early Child Spec Educ 1990; 10: 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krain AL, Kendall PC, Power TJ. The role of treatment acceptability in the initiation of treatment for ADHD. J Att Dis 2005; 9: 425–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reimers TM, Wacker DP, Cooper LJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the variables associated with treatment acceptability and their relation to compliance. Behav Disord 1992; 18: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reimers TM, Wacker DP, Cooper LJ, et al. Acceptability of behavioral treatments for children: Analog and naturalistic evaluations by parents. Sch Psychol Rev 1992; 21: 628–43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allinder RM, Oats RG. Effects of acceptability on teachers’ implementation of curriculum-based measurement and student achievement in mathematics computation. Rem Spec Educ 1997; 18: 113–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiefer I, Rathmanner T, Kunze M. Eating and dieting differences in men and women. J Mens Health Gender 2005; 2: 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kelley ML, Heffer RW, Gresham FM, et al. Development of a modified treatment evaluation inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1989; 11: 235–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Varnado-Sullivan PJ, Horton RA. Acceptability of programs for the prevention of eating disorders. J Clin Psychol 2006; 62: 687–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, et al. The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord 1987; 6: 485–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heinberg LJ, Thompson JK, Stormer S. Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord 1995; 17: 81–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Varnado-Sullivan PJ, Horton R, Savoy S. A comparison of male and female body image: The role of gender, exercise and weight status. Eat Weight Disord 2006; 11: 118–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shapiro JR, Anderson DA. The effects of restraint, gender, and body mass index on the accuracy of selfreported weight. Int J Eat Disord 2003; 34: 177–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. J. Varnado-Sullivan.

Additional information

Portions of the preliminary data from this article were presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association (SWPA), March, 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varnado-Sullivan, P.J., Savoy, S., O’Grady, M. et al. Opinions and acceptability of common weight-loss practices. Eat Weight Disord 15, e256–e264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325307

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325307

Key words

Navigation