Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 461–468 | Cite as

Persistent Deterioration of Functioning (PDF) and change in well-being in older persons

  • Angèle A. G. C. JonkerEmail author
  • Hannie C. Comijs
  • Kees C. P. M. Knipscheer
  • Dorly J. H. Deeg
Section on Longitudinal Studies/Clinical Trials


Background and aims: It is often assumed that aging is accompanied by diverse and constant functional and cognitive decline, and it is therefore surprising that the well-being of older persons does not appear to decline in the same way. This study investigates longitudinally whether well-being in older persons changes due to Persistent Deterioration of Functioning (PDF). Methods: Data were collected in the context of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA). Conditions of PDF are persistent decline in cognitive functioning, physical functioning and increase in chronic diseases. Measurements of well-being included life satisfaction, positive affect, and valuation of life. T-tests were used to analyse mean difference scores for well-being, and univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine changes in three well-being outcomes in relation to PDF. Results: Cross-sectional analyses showed significant differences and associations between the two PDF subgroups and non-PDF for well-being at T3. In longitudinal analyses, we found significant decreases in and associations with well-being over time in respondents fulfilling one PDF condition (mild PDF). For respondents fulfilling two or more PDF conditions (severe PDF), longitudinally no significant associations were found. Conclusions: Cognitive aspects of well-being (life satisfaction and valuation of life) and the affective element (positive affect) of well-being appear to be influenced negatively by mild PDF, whereas well-being does not seem to be diminished in persons with more severe PDF. This may be due to the ability to accept finally the inevitable situation of severe PDF.

Key words

Health life satisfaction older-people Persistent Deterioration of Functioning positive affect and well-being 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baltes PB. The process of successful aging. Aging Soc 1996; 16: 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawton MP, Moss C, Hoffman C, Kleban M, Ruckdeschel K, Winter L. Valuation of Life: a concept and a scale. J Aging Health 2001; 13: 3–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Westerhof GJ, Dittmann-Kohli F, Bode C. The aging paradox: towards personal meaning in gerontological theory. In Biggs S, Lowestein A, Hendricks J, eds. The need for theory: sociology for the 21st century. Amityville: Baywood, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 977–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Isaacowitz DM. Positive and negative affect in very old age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2003; 58: 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gatz M, Zarit SH. A good old age: paradox or possibility. In Bengtson VL, ed. Handbook of Theories of Aging. Springer Publishing Company, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faber von MA. Successful aging in the oldest old. Arch Intern Med 2001; 161: 2694–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rowe JK, Kahn RL. Human Aging: usual and successful. Science 1987; 237: 143–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laslett P. A fresh map of life. The emergence of the Third Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crimmins E, Hayward M, Saito Y. Differentials in active life expectancy in the older population of the United States. J Gerontol Soc Sci 1996; 51B: S111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baltes PB, Smith J. Multilevel and systemic analyses of old age: theoretical and empirical evidence for a fourth age. In Bengtson VL, ed. Handbook of theories of aging. Springer Publishing Company, 1999: 153–73.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroots JJ, Yates FE. On the dynamics of development and aging. In Bengtson VL, ed. Handbook of theories of aging. Springer Publishing Company 1999: 417–33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: three decades of progres. Psychol Bull 1999: 125: 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mroczek DK. Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005; 88: 189–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kunzmann U, Little TD, Smith J. Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 2000; 15: 511–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rott C, Jopp D, d’Heureuse V, Becker G. Predictors of well-being in very old age. In Wahl HW, ed. The many faces of health, competence and well-being in old age. Springer Publishing Company, 2006: 119–29.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM. The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 75: 1333–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jorm AF, Christensen H, Scott Henderson A, Jacomb PA, Korten AE, Mackinnon A. Factors associated with successful aging. Aust J Aging 1998; 17: 33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Newman AB, Arnold AM, Naydeck BL, et al. Successful aging. Effect of subclinical cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 2315–22.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deeg DJ, van Tilburg T, Smit JH, de Leeuw ED. Attrition in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. The effect of differential inclusion in side studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Knipscheer CPM, de Jong Gierveld J, van Tilburg TG, Dykstra PA (eds). Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull 1984; 95: 542–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoff S. And they lived happily ever after. Constructing a measurement instrument on well-being among the elderly by means of facet design. Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ranzijn R, Luszcz M. Measurement of subjective quality of life of elders. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2000; 50: 263–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Deeg DJH. Health and quality of life. In Mollenkopf H, Walker A, eds. Quality of Life in Old Age. International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2007: 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lawton MP, Moss M, Hoffman C, Grant R, Ten Have T, Kleban MH. Health valuation of life, and the wish to live. Gerontologist 1999; 39: 406–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mc Hugh PR. Mini Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinic. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kempen G, Brilman E, Ormel J. Mini-Mental State Examination. Normative data and a comparison of a 12-item and a 20-item version in a sample of community-based elders. TGG 1995: 26: 163–172 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sonsbeek van JL. Methodological and substantial aspects of the OECD indicator of chronic functional limitations. Maandbericht Gezondheid (CBS) 1988; 88: 4–17.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Central Bureau of Statistics. Health Interview Questionnaire. Heerlen: the Netherlands, 1989.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, Van Eijk JT, Boeke AJ, Deeg DJ. Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients self-report and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1407–17.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ryff CD. Possible selves in adulthood and old age: a tale of shifting horizons. Psychol Aging 1991; 6: 286–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989; 57: 1069–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borg C, Hallberg IR, Blomqvist K. Life satisfaction among older persons (65+) with reduced self-care capacity: the relationship to social, health and financial aspects. J Clin Nurs 2006; 15: 607–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kempen G, Ormel J. Daily functioning of older persons. Van Gorcum, Assen: Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1996 (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Landau R, Litwin H. Subjective well-being among the old-old: the role of health, personality and social support. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2001; 52: 265–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Campbell A. Converse PE. Rodgers WL. The Quality of American Life. Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ranzijn R, Luszcz M. Acceptance: A key to well-being in older adults. Aust Psychol 1999; 34: 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Butler, Ciarrochi J. Psychological acceptance and quality of life in the elderly. Quality Life Res 2007; 16: 607–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith J, Borchelt M, Maier H, Jopp D. Health and Well-being in the young old and oldest old. J Soc Issues 2002; 58: 715–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angèle A. G. C. Jonker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hannie C. Comijs
    • 1
  • Kees C. P. M. Knipscheer
    • 1
  • Dorly J. H. Deeg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), VU Medical CentreDepartment FSW VU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations