Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: In this pilot study, we introduce the “NeReBot”, a novel robotic device designed and programmed for clinical neurological applications. The aim of the study was to test whether additional sensorimotor training of paralyzed or paretic upper limbs, delivered by NeReBot, enhanced motor and functional outcome in stroke patients. Methods: Twenty patients with post-stroke hemiparesis or hemiplegia received standard post-stroke multidisciplinary rehabilitation, and were randomly assigned either to exposure to the robotic device without training or to additional sensorimotor robotic training (about 4 h/week) for 4 weeks. Robot training consisted of peripheral manipulation of the shoulder and elbow of the impaired limb, correlated with visual stimuli. Results: At hospital discharge, impairment and disability had declined in all patients, but the group with robot training showed higher gains on motor impairment and functional recovery, which were maintained at the 3-month follow-up. No adverse events resulted from robot-assisted therapy. Conclusions: According to our results, NeReBot therapy may efficaciously complement standard post-stroke multidisciplinary rehabilitation and offer novel therapeutic strategies for neurological rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD). The Italian guidelines for stroke prevention and treatment. Milano: Ed. Hyperphar Group 2003: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, Sifuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996; 272: 1791–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation — The Willis Lecture. Stroke 2000; 31: 223–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 745–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen M. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54: 1938–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, Mckenna-Cole A, Smith BD, Rymer WZ. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM Guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 653–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, Bardeleben A, Werner C. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 915–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, et al. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005; 13: 311–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fanin C, Gallina P, Rossi A, Zanatta U, Masiero S. Nerebot: a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Seoul. Korea 2003: 23–7.

  11. Butefish C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz H. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurologic Sci 1995; 130: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman L, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FF. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In Eisenberg MG. Grzesiak RC. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. Vol 1. New York, NY: Springer Verlag; 1987: 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Functional Independence Measure: versione italiana-manuale d’uso. Ricerca in Riabilitazione. 1992; 2 (Suppl): 1–44.

  16. Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. Memorandum n∘45. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office 1976.

  17. Chae JC, Johnston MV, Kim H, Zorowitz RD. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 218–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurology 2003; 16: 705–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwakkel G, Rollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 473–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haider P, Sterr A, Brem S, Bucher K, Kollias S, Brandeis D. Electrophysiological evidence for cortical plasticity with movement repetition. Eur J Neurosci 2005; 21: 2271–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Rhythmic bilateral movement training modulates corticomotor excitability and enhances upper limb motricity poststroke: a pilot study. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21: 124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayashi S, Hasegawa Y, Kasai T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation study of plastic changes of human motor cortex after repetitive simple muscle contractions. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2000; 74: 27–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kozlowski DA, Schallert T. Relationship between dendritic pruning and behavioral recovery following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Behav Brain Res 1998; 97: 89–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 1, 35128, Padova, Italy

    Stefano Masiero MD & Andrea Celia

  2. Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Mario Armani

  3. Department of Innovation in Mechanics and Management, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Giulio Rosati

Authors
  1. Stefano Masiero MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Celia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mario Armani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giulio Rosati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Masiero MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masiero, S., Celia, A., Armani, M. et al. A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs. Aging Clin Exp Res 18, 531–535 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324854

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324854

Keywords

Search

Navigation