Advertisement

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 433–439 | Cite as

Assessing the handwriting process in healthy elderly persons using a computerized system

  • Sara RosenblumEmail author
  • Perla Werner
Original Articles

Abstract

Background and aims: Despite the importance of handwriting in everyday life, virtually no literature can be found documenting the extent and range of everyday handwriting performance and ability among healthy elderly persons. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the kinematic characteristics of the handwriting process of healthy elderly persons and its correlates. Methods: Fifty-three healthy participants (aged 60 to 94) living in the community, performed five functional writing tasks using a computerized system which documented the handwriting process. Results: In air time (i.e., the time of non-writing while writing) accounted for approximately half to two-thirds of total writing time. Higher age was consistently associated with longer on paper and in air time, as well as with lower speed and lower pressure. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study indicate that kinematic analysis of handwriting provides important information about the handwriting process among elderly people.

Keywords

Computerized elderly handwriting kinematic measures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Census Bureau. International database. Table 094. Midyear population, by age and sex. Available at: http://www.census.gov/ population/www/projectiond/nardet-D1A.html.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hackel ME, Wolfe GA, Bang SM, Canfield JS. Changes in hand function in aging adults as determined by the Jebsen test of hand function. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 373–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Backman C, Mackie H, Harris J. Arthritis Hand Function Test: Development of a standardized assessment tool. Toronto: Canadian association of occupational therapists publication. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carmeli E. Patish H. Colman R. The aging hand. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58: 146–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shiffman LM. Effects of aging on adult hand function. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 785–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carmeli, D, Reed T. Stability and change in genetic and environmental influences on hand-grip strength in older male twins. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 1879–83.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Liu JZ, Yue GH. Skilled finger movement exercise improves hand function. J Gerontol 2001; 56: M518–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cole KJ, Rotella DL, Harper JG. Mechanisms for age-related changes of fingertip forces during precision gripping and lifting in adults. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 3228–47.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grimby G, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Hvid K, Saltin B. Morphology and enzymatic capacity in arm and leg muscles in 78–81 year old men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 1982; 115: 125–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jette AM, Branch LG, Berlin J. Musculoskeletal impairments and physical disablement among the aged. J Gerontol 1990; 45: M203–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kinoshita H, Francis PR. A comparison of prehention force control in young and elderly individuals. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996; 47: 450–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cerella J. Pigeon pattern perception: limits on perspective invariance. Perception 1990; 19: 141–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salthouse TA. The role of processing resources in cognitive aging. In Howe ML, Brainerd CJ, Eds. Cognitive development in Adulthood: Progress in Cognitive Development Research. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1988: 185–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones N, Adams J. An overview of the effect of ageing on hand function Int J Therapy Rehab 2003; 10: 374–77.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dixon RA, Kurzman D, Friesen IC. Handwriting performance in younger and older adults: age, familiarity, and practice effects. Psychol Aging 1993; 8: 360–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reisman J. Using a sensory integrative approach to treat self injurious behavior in an adult with profound mental retardation. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 403–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tseng MH, Cermak, SA. The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 919–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 7th ed. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1955.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Contereas-Vidal JL, Teulings HL, Stelmach GE. Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control. Acta Psychol 1998; 100: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Werner P, Heinik J, Mendel A. Examining the reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Mini Mental State Examination. Aging Clin Exp Res 1999; 11: 329–34.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tangalos EG, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination in general medical practice: clinical utility and acceptance. Mayo Clinic Proc 1996; 71: 829 - 837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Srikanth V, Thrift AG, Fryer JL, et al. The validity of brief screening cognitive instruments in the diagnosis of cognitive impairment and dementia after first-ever stroke. Int J Psychogeriatr 2006; 18: 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rosenblum S, Parush S, Weiss PL. The in air phenomenon: temporal and spatial correlates of the handwriting process. Percept Mot Skills 2003; 96: 933–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosenblum S, Parush S, Weiss PL. Computerized temporal handwriting characteristics of proficient and poor handwriters. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 129–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Derouesne C, Lacomblez L, Thibault S, LePoncing M. Memory complaints in young and elderly subjects. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999; 14: 291–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Werner P, Rosenblum S, Bar-On G, et al. Handwriting process variables discriminating mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006; 61: 228–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jette AM, Assmann SF, Rooks D, Harris BA, Crawford S. Interrelationships among disablement concepts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: M395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fried LP, Guralnik JM. Disability in older adults; evidence regarding significance, etiology and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 92–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fried LP, Storer DJ, King DE, Lodder F. Diagnosis of illness presentations in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 117–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gilbertson L, Barber-Lomax S. Power and pinch grip strength recorded using the hand-held JAMAR dynamometer and B+ L hydraulic. Brit J Occupat Therapy 1994; 57: 483–87.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burton J. The model of human occupation and occupational therapy practice with elderly patients, Part 1: characteristics of aging. Brit J Occupat Therapy 1989; 52: 215–18.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Desrosiers J, Herbert R, Bravo G, Dulit E. Upper-extremity motor co-ordination in healthy elderly people. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 108–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stelmach GE, Goggin NL, Garcia-Colera A. Movement specification time with age. Exp Aging Res 1987; 13: 39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Benbow M. Principles and practices of teaching handwriting. In Henderson A, Pehoski C, eds. Hand function in the child. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995: 255–81.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aniansson A, Rundgren A, Sperling L. Evaluation of functional capacity in activities of daily living in 70-year-old men and woman. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980; 2: 145–54.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hyatt RH, Whitlaw MN, Bhat A, Scott S, Maxwell JD. Association of muscle strength with functional status of elderly people. Age Aging 1990; 19: 330–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sperling L. Evaluation of upper extremity function in 70-year-old men and women. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980; 12: 139–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Darling WG, Cooke JD, Brown, SH. Control of simple arm movement in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 1989; 10: 149–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Galganski ME, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka R. Reduced control of motor output in human hand muscle of elderly subjects during sub-maximal contractions. J Neurophysiol 1993; 69: 2108–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kanda K, Hashizume K. Changes in properties of the medial gastrocenemius motor units in rats. J Neurophysiol 1989; 61: 737–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Teulings HL, Stelmach GE. Control of stroke size, peak acceleration, and stroke duration in parkinsonian handwriting. Hum Mov Sci 1991; 10: 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Teulings H, Stelmach GE. Stimulation of impairment of force amplitude and force timing in parkinsonian handwriting. In Stelmach GE, Requin J, Eds. Tutorials in Motor Behavior II. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992: 425–42.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Terao S, Sobue G, Hashizume Y. Age related changes in human spinal ventrals horn cells with special reference to the loss of small neurons in the intermediate zone: A quantitative analysis. Acta Neuropathol 1993; 92: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kershalo DR. Somesthetic sensitivity in young and elderly humans. J Gerontol 1986; 41: 732–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fronterna WR, Suh D, Krivickas LS, Hughes VA, Goldstein R, Roubenoff R. Skeletal muscle fiber quality in older men and woman. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: 611–8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berninger V, Mizokawa D, Bragg R. Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing. J Sch Psychol 1991; 29: 57–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Berninger VW, Vaughan KB, Abbott, RD, et al. Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: transfer from handwriting to composition. J Educ Psychol 1997; 89: 652–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lindle RS, Metter EJ, Lynch NA. Age and gender comparisons of muscle strength in 654 woman and men aged 20–93 yr. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 1581–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ericsson K, Forssell L, Amberla K, Holmen K, Vitanen M, Winbald B. Graphic skills used as an instrument for detecting higher cortical dysfunctions in old age. Hum Mov Sci 1991; 10: 335–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rosenblum S, Weiss PL, Parush S. Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties: A review. Educat Psychol Rev 2003; 15: 41–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Internal Publishing Switzerland 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational TherapyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health StudiesUniversity of HaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations