Abstract
Background and aims: Elderly people tend to evaluate their memory functioning pessimistically and have a decrease in self-efficacy beliefs associated with an attributional style which relies mainly on uncontrollable causes. This pattern may be significantly influenced by the caregivers evaluations of self-efficacy beliefs and attributional style of the elderly. This study compares older and younger adults with respect to everyday memory self-assessment, self-efficacy beliefs and attributional style, and examines the relationships between everyday memory self-assessment, self-evaluations, and evaluations by significant others as regards elderly self-efficacy beliefs, attributional style, and everyday memory. Methods: 100 older, 100 younger, and 100 middle-aged adults were required to complete questionnaires aimed at assessing everyday memory, attributional style, and self-efficacy beliefs. The group of middle-aged adults was asked to complete questionnaires aimed at assessing the perceived efficacy and attributional style of the older and younger participants. Results: Data indicate that, unlike younger adults, the elderly negatively evaluate their everyday memory, have an attributional style mainly characterized by uncontrollable factors, and have less confidence in their memory. A structural equation model shows that the opinions of the significant others (relatives or medical staff) as regards the perceived efficacy and attributional style of elderly people affect their self-efficacy and attributional style which, in turn, influence everyday self-reported memory efficiency. Conclusions: Results indicate the central role of metamemory in everyday memory evaluation in the elderly, and stress the importance of what significant others think as regards the elderly person in question. From a practical point of view, it makes an important contribution to intervention and prevention programs involving people in close contact with the elderly, by suggesting ways in which significant others can help in optimizing the ability of older people to meet the challenges of aging successfully.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cavanaugh JC, Green EE. I believe, therefore I can: Self-efficacy beliefs in memory aging. In Hess TM, Ed. Aging and cognition. Mental Processes, self-awareness and interventions. Advances in the Netherlands. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. 1990: 157–88.
Craik HM, Salthouse TA. Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
Hertzog C, Hultsch DF. Metacognition in adulthood and old age In Craik HM. Salthouse TA, eds. Hanbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000: 117–176.
Cavanaugh JC, Poon LW. Metamemorial predictors of memory performance in younger adult and older adults. Psych and Aging 1989; 4: 365–8.
Sgaramella TM. Neuropsicologia cognitiva dell’invecchiamento. Milano: Masson, 1999.
Laicardi C, Pezzuti L. Psicologia dell’invecchiamento e della longevità. Bologna: II Mulino, 2000.
McDonald-Miszczak L, Hertzog C, Hultsch DF. Stability and Accuracy of Metamemory in Adulthood and Aging: A longitudinal Analysis. Psych and Aging 1995; 10: 553–64.
Loftus EF. Suggestion, imagination, and the transformation of reality. In Stone AA, Turkkan J, Eds. The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000: 201–10.
Amoretti G, Ratti MT. Psicologia e terza età. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica, 1994.
Shaie KW, Willis SL. Adult Development and aging, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.
Hertzog C, Dixon RA, Hultsch DF. Metamemory in adulthood: differentiating knowledge, belief, and behaviour. In Hess TM, Ed. Aging and cognition: Knowledge oraganization and utilization. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 1990: 107–35.
Ryan EB, See SK. Age-based beliefs about memory changes for self and others across adulthood. J of Geront 1993; 48: 199–201.
De Beni R, Mazzoni G, Pagotto S. Fiducia nel proprio sistema di memoria e stili attributivi nell’anziano. Confronti tra differenti età e diversi contesti abitativi. Ricerche di Psicologia 1997; 20: 63–93.
Park DC, Schwarz N. Cognitive aging: A primer. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis, 2000.
Hummert ML. Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: a comparison of structure and evaluations. Psych Aging 1990; 5: 183–93.
Levy B. Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. J Pers Soc Psych 1996; 71: 1092–107.
Rodin J, Langer E. Ageing labels: The decline and fall of self-esteem. J of Soc Iss 1980; 36: 12–9.
De Beni R, Mazzoni G. L’attribuzione e la fiducia nelle proprie abilità mnestiche. Il livello strategico e la prestazione di memoria in bambini di differenti età. Età Evolutiva 1991; 38: 32–50.
Miller SA. Parent’s attribution for their children’s behavior. Child Dev 1995; 66: 1557–84.
Sunderland A, Harris JH, Baddeley A. Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. J Verb Lear Verb Beh 1983; 22: 341–57.
Baddeley A. La memoria umana. Teoria e pratica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1992.
Cornish IM. Factor Structure of the EMQ. British J Psych 2000; 91: 427–38.
Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psych Rev 1985; 92: 548–73.
Weiner B. Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown: General Learning Press, 1974.
Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. The Student Edition of LISREL 8.50 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc., 2001.
Lovelace EA. Aging and metacognition concerning memory function. In Lovelace EA, Ed. Aging and cognition: Mental processes, self-awareness, and interventions. Advances in psychology. Oxford: North Holland, 1990, 18–35.
Jussim L. Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psych Rev 1986; 93: 429–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zanardo, F., De Béni, R. & Moè, A. Influence of other-beliefs on self-beliefs and on everyday memory self-report in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 18, 425–432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324839
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324839