Skip to main content
Log in

Age- and sex-stratified prevalence of physical disabilities and handicap in the general population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Our aim was to provide age- and sex-stratified prevalence estimates of physical disabilities and handicap in the general Belgian population. Methods: A cross-sectional and demographically representative health interview survey was conducted nationwide in Belgium in 1997. The 8836 persons aged 15 years and over who answered the health interview were included in this study. Seventeen items from the survey encompassing main activities of daily living (ADL) and confining were analyzed. To provide prevalence estimates as detailed as possible, neither aggregation nor dichotomization were applied. Results: Women consistently reported more disability than men: mobility (p<0.001 ), transfer in-out bed (p<0.001 ), transfer in-out chair (p<0.001 ), dressing (p=0.004 ), washing hands and face (p=0.029 ), getting to and using toilet (p=0.003 ), continence (p<0.001 ), seeing (p<0.001 ) and mastication (p<0.001 ). As expected, there was a marked trend for increased prevalence of disability with increasing age for both sexes. Moderate disability arose mainly from the 25–34 age group for both sexes. For both genders, severe disability appeared mainly at higher ages, particularly for the 65–74 age group. Nevertheless, the data suggest that continence problems for women, mobility and transfer issues for men, as well as mastication problems for both genders, clearly emerge earlier than age 65. Regarding handicap, observed prevalence rates were increasing, in age as was the case for disability, but no differences were found between men or women, except for confinement to house/garden, for which women presented a higher rate in general (p<0.001 ) and in the 75–84 age group (p=0.036 ) in particular. Conclusions: This study shows the wide range of disability types in the general population and their association with handicap. While elderly individuals consistently report higher degrees of disability and handicap, attention should also be paid to younger age groups. Disability calls for wide, coherent and relevant medical as well as social responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision, New York, 2001.

  2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowling A. Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ostchega Y, Harris TB, Hirsch R, Parsons VL, Kington R. The prevalence of functional limitations and disability in older persons in the US: data from the national health and nutrition examination survey III. J Am Geriatr Assoc 2000; 48: 1132–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harwood RH, Prince MJ, Mann AH, et al. The prevalence of diagnoses, impairments, disabilities and handicaps in a population of elderly people living in a defined geographical area: the Gospel Oak project. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 707–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Béland F, Zunzunegui MV. Predictors of functional status in older people living at home. Age Ageing 1999; 28: 153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crimmins EM, Saito Y, Reynolds SL. Further evidence on recent trends in the prevalence and incidence of disability among older Americans from two sources: the Longitudinal Study of Aging (LSOA) and the National Health Interview Survey (HHIS). J Gerontol 1997; 52B: S59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guralnik JM, Alecxih L, Branch LG, et al. Medical and long-term care costs when older persons become more dependent. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1244–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quataert P, Van Oyen H, Tafforeau J, et al. Health Interview Survey, 1997. Protocol for the selection of households and respondents. S.P.H/EPISERIE Nℴ 12, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, 1997.

  10. Van Oyen H, Tafforeau J, Hermans H, et al. The Belgian Health Interview Survey. Arch Public Health 1997; 55: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE, Krinstin KS, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute: 1993.

  12. Hirsch RP, Riegelman R. Statistical operations. Analysis of health research data. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Science: 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ostir GV, Carlson JE, Black SA, Rudkin L, Goodwin JS, Markides KS. Disability in older adults 1: Prevalence, causes and consequences. Behav Med 1999; 24: 147–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME. Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Ann Rev Public Health 1996; 17: 25–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebrahim S. Disability in older people: a mass problem requiring a mass solution. Lancet 1999; 353: 1990–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cassou B, Derriennic F, Monfort C, et al. Predictive factors of physical disability in a cohort of retired persons in Paris followed during 10 years. [in French]. Revue d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique 1997; 45: 382–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ostchega Y, Harris TB, Hirsch R, et al. The prevalence of functional limitations and disability in older persons in the US: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000; 48: 1132–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalache A, Keller I. The greying world: a challenge for the twenty-first century. Sci Progr 2000; 83: 33–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paccaud F. Rejuvenating health systems for aging communities. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 314–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leibovici D, Curtis S, Ritchie K. The application of disability data from epidemiological surveys to the development of indicators of service needs for dependent elderly people. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Waidmann TA, Liu K. Disability trends among elderly persons and implications for the future. J Gerontol 2000; 55B: S298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singer BH, Manton KG. The effects of health changes on projections of health service needs for the elderly population of the United States. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 15618–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Joël M-E, Dufour-Kippelen S. Financing systems of care for older persons in Europe. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 293–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Manton KG, Corder L, Stallard E. Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982–1994. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2593–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoeni RF, Freedman VA, Wallace RB. Persistent, consistent, widespread and robust? Another look at recent trends in old-age disability. J Gerontol 2001; 56B: S206–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Freedman VA, Martin LG. Understanding trends in functional limitations among older Americans. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1457–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Winblad I, Jääskeläinen M, Kivelä S-L, et al. Prevalence of disability in three birth cohorts at old age over time spans of 10 and 20 years. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 1019–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jette AM, Branch LG. The Framingham Disability Study. II. Physical disability among the aging. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oman D, Reed D, Ferrara A. Do elderly women have more physical disability than men do? Am J Epidemiol 1999; 150: 834–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Merrill SS, Seeman TE, Kasl SV, Berkman LF. Gender differences in the comparison of self reported disability and performance measures. J Gerontol 1997; 52A: M19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbotte E, Guillemin F, Chau N, and the Lorhandicap Group. Prevalence of impairments, disabilities, handicaps and quality of life in the general population: a review of the recent literature. Bull WHO 2001; 79:1047–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Picavet HSJ, van den Bos GAM. The contribution of six chronic conditions to the total burden of mobility disability in the Dutch population. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1680–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Albert SM, Im A, Raveis VH. Public health and the second 50 years of life. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ethgen, O., Gillain, D., Gillet, P. et al. Age- and sex-stratified prevalence of physical disabilities and handicap in the general population. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 389–397 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324569

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324569

Key Words

Navigation