Skip to main content
Log in

A prospective evaluation of the cumulative illness rating scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of overall physical health is an important yet little studied problem in geriatric research. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) was among the first instruments that attempted to summarize the overall severity of illness based on clinical information. This study evaluated the CIRS in a prospective longitudinal study of 181 elderly (mean age ± SD = 79 ± 7.4) subjects undergoing comprehensive geriatric assessment in an outpatient unit. The CIRS was found to correlate negatively with activities of daily living (@#@ r = − 0.49, p = 0.0001), instrumental activities of daily living (@#@ r = − 0.34, p = 0.0001), patient morale (@#@ r = − 0.30, p = 0.0001), and positively with days in hospital (@#@ r = 0.21, p = 0.0075) and number of medications (@#@ r = 0.31, p = 0.0001). Mean CIRS scores for subjects who died during follow- up were significantly higher than the scores for survivors (@#@ p<0.01 @#@). In logistic regression, CIRS was a significant predictor of death, yet it did not improve that prediction over information contained in measures of activities of daily living. In separate logistic analyses, CIRS and age predicted acute care hospital days during follow- up, while ADL or IADL predicted the use of nursing home services. Although the CIRS appears to be a reliable method of summarizing medical information and to have some external validity, in its present form it does not provide additional prognostic information. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 4: 171- 178, 1992)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kane R.A., Kane R.L.: Measures of physical functioning in long-term care. In: Kane R.A., Kane R.L. (Eds.), Assessing the Elderly: A Practical Guide to Measurement. Lexington Books, Lexington and Toronto, 1981, pp. 25–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brodman K., Erdman A.J., Longe I., Wolff H.G.: The Cornell medical index health questionnaire: II. as a diagnostic instrument. JAMA 145: 152–157, 1951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosencramz H.A., Pihlblad C.T.: Measuring the health of the elderly. J. Gerontol. 25: 129–133, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development: Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Duke University, Durham, N.C., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan M.H., Feinstein A.R.: The importance of classifying initial comorbidity in evaluating the outcome of Diabetes Mellitus. J. Chronic Dis. 27: 387–404, 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenfield S., Blanco D.M., Elashoff R.M., Ganz P.A.: Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. JAMA 257: 2766–2770, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlson M.E., Sax F.L., Mackenzie C.R., Fields S.D., Braham R.L., Douglas R.G.: Assessing illness severity: Does clinical judgment work? J. Chronic Dis. 39: 439–452, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., Mackenzie C.R.: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 40: 373–383, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pompei P., Charlson M.E., Douglas G.: Clinical assessments as predictors of one year survival after hospitalization. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41: 275–284, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stewart A.L., Greenfield S., Hays R.D., Wells K., Rogers W.H., Berry S.D., Mc Glynn E.A., Ware J.E.: Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. JAMA 262: 907–913, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Linn B.S., Linn M.W., Gurel L.: Cumulative illness rating scale. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 16: 622–626, 1968.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Linn B.S., Linn M.W.: Objective and self-assessed health in the old and very old. Soc. Sci. Med. 14: 311–315, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lawton M., Brody E.M.: Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9: 179–186, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris J.N., Sherwood S.: A re-testing and modification of the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale. J. Gerontol. 30: 77–84, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams M.E.: Outpatient geriatric evaluation. Geriatr. Clin. 3: 175–183, 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams M.E.: Identifying the older person likely to require long-term care services. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 35: 761–766, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scholer S.G., Potter J.F., Burke W.J.: Does the Williams Manual Test Predict Service Use Among Subjects Undergoing Geriatric Assessment? J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38: 767–772, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker S., Duncan D.: Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrica 54: 167–169, 1967.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aldrich J.N., Nelson F.D.: Linear probability, logit and probid models: Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, Series 07-045. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, 1984, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Knaus W.A., Draper E.A., Wagner D.P., Zimmerman J.E.: Apache II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 13: 818–829, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown L.J., Potter J.F., Foster B.G.: Caregiver burden should be evaluated during geriatric assessment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38: 455–460, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rubenstein L.Z., Josephson K.R., Wieland G.D., English P.A., Sayre J.A., Kane R.L.: Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit: A randomized clinical trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 311: 1664–1670, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The data reported in this paper were presented in part at a meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco, California, U.S.A., November 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waldman, E., Potter, J.F. A prospective evaluation of the cumulative illness rating scale. Aging Clin Exp Res 4, 171–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324087

Keywords

Navigation