Skip to main content
Log in

Uniform Laws of Large Numbers for Triangular Arrays of Function-indexed Processes under Random Entropy Conditions

  • Published:
Results in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mean Glivenko Cantelli Theorems are established for triangular arrays of rowwise independent processes. Methods developed by Pollard (1990) are combined with a truncation method essentially due to Alexander (1987). By this, applicability to partial sum processes in particular is achieved, for which Pollard’s truncation method fails. Nevertheless, the metric entropy condition appearing here is kept as weak as Pollard’s by means of application of Hoffmann-Jørgensen’s inequality, which has not been used so far in this context.

The main theorem of the paper contains Pollard’s theorem as well as former results by Giné and Zinn (1984) and proves applicable to so-called random measure processes, certain function-indexed processes including empirical processes, partial-sum processes, the sequential empirical process and certain types of smoothed empirical processes.

Statistical applications include nonparametric regression and the estimation of the intensity measure of a spatial Poisson process (Poisson point process).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander, K.S. (1987): Central limit theorems for stochastic processes under random entropy conditions. Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 75, 351–378.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, K.S. (1987): The central limit theorem for empirical processes on Vapnik-Cervonenkis classes. Ann. Probab. 15, 178–203.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bass, R.F. and Pyke, R. (1984): A strong law of large numbers for partial-sum processes indexed by sets. Ann. Probab. 12, 268–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudley, R.M. (1984): A course on empirical processes. Lecture Notes in Math. 1097, 1–142.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaenssler, P. and Schlumprecht, Th. (1988): Maximal inequalities for stochastic processes which are given as sums of independent stochastic processes (with applications to empirical processes). Preprint, University of Munich.

  6. Gaenssler, P. and Ziegler, K. (1992): On a mean Glivenko-Cantelli result for certain set-indexed processes. Preprint No. 51, University of Munich.

  7. Gaenssler, P. (1993): On recent developments in the theory of set-indexed processes. A unified approach to empirical and partial-sum processes. In: Asymptotic Statistics (Petr Mandl and Marie Husková (Eds.)), pp. 87–109.. Physica Verlag Heidelberg 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaenssler, P. and Ziegler, K. (1994): A uniform law of large numbers for set-indexed processes with applications to empirical and partial-sum processes. In Probability in Banach Spaces Vol. 9, 385–400., Birkhäuser, Boston.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaenssler, P. and Ziegler, K. (1994): On function-indexed partial-sum processes. In: Prob. Theory and Math. Stat (B. Grigelonis et al. (Eds.)), pp. 285-311. VSP/TEV 1994.

  10. Giné, E. and Zinn, J. (1984): Some limit theorems for empirical processes. Ann. Probab. 12, 929–989.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Giné, E. and Zinn, J. (1986): Lectures on the central limit theorem for empirical processes. Lecture Notes in Math. 1221, 50–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giné, E. and Zinn, J. (1987): The law of large numbers for partial-sum processes indexed by sets. Ann Probab 15, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ledoux, M. and Talagrand, M. (1991): Probability in Banach Spaces. Springer, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liese, F. (1990): Estimation of Intensity Measures of Poisson Point Processes. In Transactions of the Eleventh Prague Conference, Vol. A, 121–139.. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liese, F. and Ziegler, K. (1999): A Note on Empirical Process Methods in the Theory of Poisson PointProcesses. Scand. J. Statist. 26, 533–537.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pisier (1983): Some applications of the metric entropy condition to harmonic analysis. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 995, 123–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollard, D. (1990): Empirical Processes: Theory and Applications. NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series.

  18. Shorack, G.R. and Wellner, J. A. (1986): Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics. Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Stute, W. (1993): Nonparametric Model Checks for Regression. Invited Talk on occasion of the Second Gauß-Symposium in Munich, August 02-07, 1993

  20. Van der Vaart, A.W. and Wellner, J.A. (1996): Weak convergence and empirical processes with applications to statistics. Springer, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yukich, J. E. (1992): Weak convergence of smoothed empirical processes. Scand. J. Statist. 19, 271–279.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ziegler, K. (1994): On Uniform Laws of Large Numbers and Functional Central Limit Theorems for Sums of Independent Processes. Dissertation, Univ. of Munich.

  23. Ziegler, K. (1997): On Hoffmann-Jørgensen-type inequalities for outer expectations with applications. Result. Math. 32, 179–192.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ziegler, K. (1997): Functional Central Limit Theorems for Triangular Arrays of Function-indexed Processes under uniformly integrable entropy conditions. J. Multivariate Anal. 62, 233–272.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ziegler, K. Uniform Laws of Large Numbers for Triangular Arrays of Function-indexed Processes under Random Entropy Conditions. Results. Math. 39, 374–389 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03322697

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03322697

AMS subject classification

Key words

Navigation