Skip to main content
Log in

Genetics of Dental Agenesis: Anterior and Posterior Area of the Arch

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not dental agenesis is regulated by genes and, in those cases under genetic control, if there were differences between incisors-canines and premolars-molars in the genetic transmission of agenesis. Methods: This study was conducted on all patients who presented for a clinical evaluation in the Orthodontic Unit of the Department of Dentistry between 2001 and 2002. All patients were screened for dental agenesis. At the end of the selection process, 17 patients with dental agenesis, 6 to 20 years of age, were questioned about their family dental history for the purpose of constructing family trees and 15 family trees were constructed. The patients were questioned regarding any dental anomalies present. Panoramic radiographs, casts, and dental examinations were performed on the patients. For the patient’s relatives, panoramic radiographsex and oral histories were generally collected. Results: The most often missing teeth were mandibular second premolars. On the basis of the family trees, the data allowed for the identification of two different groups: 1) 9 families had dental agenesis as a function of genetic transmission and 2) 6 families exhibited dental agenesis as a sporadic condition. In the former group of patients, agenesis primarily involved the maxillary lateral incisors. This appeared to be transmitted as an autosomal dominant characteristic, with variable expression and incomplete penetrance. In these families, both in individuals with and without agenesis, other anomalies were present, such as supernumerary teeth, microdontia, and anomalous teeth. In these cases, agenesis was one of the manifestations of an anomaly of the dental lamina, specifically mild dysplasia. In the latter group of patients, agenesis was a characteristic present only in orthodontic patients. In this group, agenesis most commonly involved the second molars and the second premolars. Conclusion: These findings indicate that agenesis of anterior teeth may depend on genes, while agenesis of posterior teeth is sporadic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesalo L, Portin P., The inheritance pattern of missing, peg-shaped, and strongly mesio-distally reduced upper lateral incisors. Acta Odont Scandica, 1969;27:563–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bella G, Caltabiano M, Rossetti B, Messina G, Clinical investigation of a case of hypodontia. Stomat Mediter, 1984;3:451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bella G, Caltabiano M, Russo S, Messina G. Statistical survey of incidence of agenesis occurring in 447 subjects. Minerva Stomat, 1984;33: 609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracco P, Mossino ML, Negro Ferrero S. Familial agenesis of two upper permenent canines. Minerva Stomat, 1986;35: 937–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton JM. “Congenital dental anomalies occurring in 3,557 children.” ASDC J Dent Child, 1956;23:206–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney PV. Hypodontia, two cases reports. J Canad Dent Assoc, 1985;11:831–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desiate A, Milano V. 2 rare cases of agenesis of the second molar among blood relations. A clinical contribution. Minerva Stoma, 1999;47(9): 431–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagland MC. 1970. Congenital absence of the second permanent molar. Brit Dent J, 1970;128:247–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egermark-Erikson I., Lind V. 1971. Congenital numerical variation in the permanent dentition. Sex distribution of hypodontia and hyperodontia. Odon Revy, 1971;22:309–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahen H. 1956. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a clinical and genetical investigation. Odont Revy, 1956;7:1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Muzio L., Mignogna MD., Bucci P., Sorrentino F. A statistical survey of incidence of agenesis occurring in 1,529 subjects. Minerva stomat, 1989;38(9): 1045–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miotti B., Pase U., Miotti F., 1979. Investigation of genes in hereditary hypodontia. Minerva Stomat, 1979;28: 289–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik S.A. 1972. Missing and rudimentary upper lateral incisors: a statistical survey. J Dent, 1972;1: 25–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Amer Dent Assoc, 1970;81:101–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palattella G. et al., Statistical analysis of hypodontia occurring in 2,500 children examinated in Radiology Department of “G. Eastman” Hospital. Stomat Mediterran, 1982;2:157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindborg JJ. Abnormalities of tooth morphology. in Pathology of Dental Hard Tissues, Copenhagen: Munksgard; 1970, pp15–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokala P, Acs G. 1994. A constellation of dental anomalies in a chromosomal deletion syndrome (7q32): case report. Pediatc Dent, 1994;16:306–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta R.. Hereditary agenesis of ten maxillary posterior teeth: a family history. ASDC J Dent Child, 1985;52:125–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk-van der Weide Y, Bosman F. Tooth size in relatives of individuals with oligodontia. Archs Oral Biol, 1996;41:469–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk-van der Weid Y, Steen WH, Bosman F. Distribution of missing teeth and tooth morphology in patients with oligodontia. ASDC J Dent Child, 1992;59:133–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz AH. The hereditary tendency to eliminate the upper lateral incisor. Human Biology, 1932;4:34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz AH. Inherited reductions in the dentition of man. Human Biology, 1934;6:627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano J. Oligodontia and fusion Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Path, 1972;34:691–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stritzel F, Symons AL, Gage JP. Agenesis of the second premolar in males and females: distribution, number and sites affected. J Clinil Pediatc Dent, 1990;15:39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svinhufvud E, Myllarniemi S, Norio R. Dominant inheritance of tooth malpositions and their association to hypodontia. Clinic Genet, 1998;34:373–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal H. Familial hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a case report. J Dent, 1981;3:260–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercellino V, Dessanti GA, Solinas GF. A case of familial hypodontia. Minerva Stomat, 1980;29: 359–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vercellino V, Dessanti GA, Solinas GF. Hypodontia and anodontia. Minerva Stomat, 1981;30: 21–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pilotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galluccio, G., Pilotto, A. Genetics of Dental Agenesis: Anterior and Posterior Area of the Arch. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9, 41–45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321595

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321595

Key Words

Navigation