Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of thickness of cavity wall on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations

  • Research
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aim: This was to evaluate the effect of different thicknesses of cavity walls on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations. Methods: 80 carious extracted human primary molar teeth were selected for pulpotomy preparation. The teeth were divided into four groups. Mesio- or disto-occlusal (20 teeth) and mesio-occluso-distal (20 teeth); cavities were prepared in both first and second primary molar teeth. Each group was divided into two subgroups of ten teeth according to the thickness of their walls (1.5 or 2.5 mm). After restoring teeth with amalgam, all groups were stored in distilled water at 37°C for seven days. They were then thermo cycled 1,000 times between 5° to 55°C. The specimens were then subjected to a compressive axial load in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm min−1. The t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean fracture resistances of the first and second molar teeth were 975.5 ± 368.8 and 1049.2 ± 540.1, respectively. In the first molars, fracture resistance of 2-surface cavities was significantly more than 3-surface cavities (p=0.001), but this difference was not statistically significant in second molars. In second molars, fracture strength in 2- and 3-surface cavities with a 2.5 mm thickness in the walls was more than those with 1.5 mm thickness. However, in first molars this difference was only statistically significant in 3-surface cavities (p=0.045). Conclusions: The fracture strength in pulpotomized primary molar teeth with amalgam restorations was high, more than maximum bite forces in primary teeth, even in extensive 3-surface cavities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71(6):565–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakke M, Holm B, Jensen BL, Michler L, Moller E. Unilateral, isometric bite force in 8–68-year-old women and men related to occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98(2):149–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, Potter RH. Effect of designs of class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth to fracture. Oper Dent.1983;8(1):6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson G.E.: Bite force and chewing efficiency; in Kawamura Y. (ed): Frontiers in Oral physiology 1. Physiology of Mastication. Basel. Karger, 1979, pp 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron GA, Murchison DF, Cohen RB, Broome JC. Resistance to fracture of teeth with various preparations for amalgam. J Dent.1996;24(6):407–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sherif MH, Halhoul MN, Kamar AA, Hourel-Din A, Fracture strength of premolars with class 2 silver amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1988;13:50–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fields HW, Proffit WR, Case JC, Vig KW. Variables affecting measurements of vertical occlusal force. J Dent Res. 1986;65(2):135–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorucu J, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of teeth with class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations. Oper Dent. 2003;28(5):501–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EK, Asmussen E, Christiansen NC. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;6(2):49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JK, Schwartz NL, Blackwell RT. Evaluation and restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth: A Review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93(3):597–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamegai T, Tatsuki T, Nagano H, et al. A determination of bite force in northern Japanese children. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(1):53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiliaridis S, Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Craniofacial morphology, occlusal traits and bite force in persons with advanced occlusal tooth wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(3):286–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn J, Messer HH. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. J Endod. 1994;20(10):479–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maki K, Nishioka T, Morimoto A, Naito M, Kimura M. A study on the measurement of occlusal force and masticatory efficiency in school age Japanese Children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(4):281–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, et al. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43(4):419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega VL, Pegoraro LF, Conti PC, do Valle AL, Bonfante G. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements. J Oral Rahabil. 2004;31(4):393–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod.1995;21(2):57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pilo R, Brosh T, Chweidan H. Cusp reinforcement by bonding of amalgam restorations. J Dent. 1998;26(5–6):467–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15(11):512–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rentes AM, Gaviao MB, Amaral JR. Bite force determination in children with primary dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29(12):1174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, W.F.: Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition; in Pinkham, JR. (ed): Pediatric Dentistry. Infancy through adolescence.4th Ed, Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co; 2005. pp. 348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mazhari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazhari, F., Gharaghahi, M. Effect of thickness of cavity wall on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 9, 31–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321593

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03321593

Key words

Navigation