Skip to main content
Log in

Analisi costo-efficacia di rituximab + CHOP versus CHOP in soggetti affetti da linfoma non-Hodgkin aggressivo

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab + CHOP versus CHOP in patients with aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles

Summary

Objective

Aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rituximab + CHOP (R-CHOP) versus CHOP alone, in Italian patients with aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), in the NHS’ perspective.

Design

The economic analysis is based on an existing Markov model which was developed to evaluate costs and effects for two hypothetical cohorts of patients aged ≥ 60 years or aged < 60 years respectively, over a time frame of 15 years after administration of chemotherapy. The model is based on five health states (start therapy, complete response, no response, progression, death) and combines efficacy data from published clinical trials (GELA-98-5) with costs of therapies and follow-up after chemotherapy, based on Italian treatment patterns. Costs and effects were discounted respectively at 6% and 1.5% per year. Extensive 1-way and Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of results.

Results

For the two cohorts (age ≥ 60 or age < 60 years), incremental discounted survival gains with R-CHOP vs. CHOP were respectively 1.08 and 1.02 years per patient; incremental QALYs were 1.15 and 1.04 per patient; incremental cost/patient was €14 838 and €13 938; the incremental cost per life-year gained (cost/LYG) was therefore €13 732 and €13 717, while the incremental cost/QALY gained was €12 879 and €13 362.

Conclusions

The clinical advantage of R-CHOP is supported by values of incremental cost/LYG and cost/QALY gained, which are well below the thresholds commonly indicated both in the international and Italian literature. R-CHOP is a substantial improvement in the treatment of aggressive NHL, at a reasonable cost, in the perspective of the Italian NHS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Weisemberg DD. Epidemiology of non Hodgkin’s lymphoma; recent findings regarding an emerging epidemic. Ann Oncol 1992; 5 (Suppl. 1): 19–24

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coiffier B. Non Hodgkin’s lymphomes. In: Cavalli F, Hansen HH, Kaye SB (eds). Textbook of medical oncology. London: Martin Dunitz, 1997: 265–87

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tilly H, Lepade E, Coiffier B, et al. A randomized comparison of ACVBP and CHOP in the GELA Study treatment of advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the LNH93-5 study. Blood 2000; 96: 832a (abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 235–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coiffier B, Herbrecht R, Tilly H, et al. GELA study comparing CHOP and R-CHOP in elderly patients with DLCL: 3-year median follow-up with an analysis according to co-morbidity factors. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003a; 22: 596 (abstr. 2395)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coiffier B, Herbrecht R, Morel CH, et al. GELA study comparing CHOP and R-CHOP in elderly patients with DLCL: 3-year median follow-up with an analysis according to co-morbidity factors. Hematology J 2003b; 4 (Suppl. 2): 111–2 (abstr. 0356 — EHA 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamblin T, Best HJ, Morris J, Hornberger J. Cost-effectiveness of rituximab in treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Abstract and poster presented at the British Society of Haematology (BSH) Conference, Brighton, April 2002

  8. Best HJ, Hornberger J, Ommes FL, Coiffier B. Cost-effectiveness of rituximab in treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Abstract pcn 13 and poster presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), Arlington, May 2002. Value in Health 2002; 5(3): 198–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hornberger J, Lewis G. Cost-utility of rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Abstract presented at the EORTC (Third European Conference on the Economics of Cancer), Brussels, September 2003. Eur J Cancer 2003; 1 (Suppl. 3): S3

    Google Scholar 

  10. Briggs A, Sculpher M. An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation. PharmacoEconomics 1998; 13(4): 397–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Proctor SJ, Mackie M, Dawson A, et al. A population-based study of intensive multi-agent chemotherapy with or without autotransplant for the highest risk Hodgkin’s disease patients identified by the Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group (SNLG) prognostic index. A Scotland and Newcastle Lymphoma Group study (SNLG HD III). Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 795–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, et al. A revised European-American classification of tumors: pathology and genetics of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doorduijn J, Buijt I, Uyl-de Groot C, et al. Quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) treated with CHOP. Blood 2001; 98(11): abstr. 1803

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ballatori E, Berto P, Roila F. L’analisi farmacoeconomica in oncologia. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  15. Czuczman MS, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al. Treatment of patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 268–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maloney DG, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, et al. IDEC- C2B8 (Rituximab) anti CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with relapsed low-grade non Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood 1997; 90: 2188–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rambaldi A, Lazzari M, Manzoni C, et al. Monitoring of minimal residual disease after CHOP and rituximab in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma. Blood 2002; 99: 856–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spina M, Sparano JA, Jaeger U, et al. Rituximab and chemotherapy is highly effective in patients with CD20-positive non Hodgkin’s lymphoma and HIV infection. AIDS 2003; 17: 137–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheldon T. Problems of using modelling in the economic evaluation of health care. Health Econ 1996; 5: 1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Donaldson C, Currie G, Mitton C. Cost effectiveness analysis in health care: contraindications. BMJ 2002; 325: 891–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Messori A, Trippoli S. La farmacoeconomia come disciplina scientifica: panoramica delle principali metodologie ed esempi. Giornale di Farmacoeconomia 1998; 2: 176–89

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miller MA, McCann L. Policy analysis of the use of hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type B, Streptococcus pneumoniae-conjugate and rotavirus vaccines in national immunization schedules. Health Econ 2000, 9: 19–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. ISTAT. Annuario Statistico Italiano. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Berto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berto, P., Morsanutto, A., Lopatriello, S. et al. Analisi costo-efficacia di rituximab + CHOP versus CHOP in soggetti affetti da linfoma non-Hodgkin aggressivo. Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 6, 151–160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320633

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320633

Navigation