Skip to main content
Log in

Analisi delle prescrizioni farmaceutiche e dei costi del trattamento del carcinoma prostatico nell’ULSS 9 di Treviso

A cost-analysis of hormone therapy in advanced prostate carcinoma: evidence from Treviso, Italy

  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles

Summary

Objective

In Italy, the standard curative treatment for prostate carcinoma with metastases is the androgen suppression therapy (AST). Recently, intermittent AST has been introduced for the treatment of androgen-responsive patients aged > 75 years in order to reduce the toxicity and cost of treatment, as well as to delay tumor progression. The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-analysis of standard AST, intermittent AST or bilateral surgical castration.

Patients and setting

A total of 584 patients from the ULSS 9 (district of Treviso, Veneto, Italy) treated with AST, examined in 1999.

Main outcome measures

Parameters adopted in this study were drug prescriptions, length of treatments, biochemical assays and costs of hospital stay.

Results

The patients exposed to AST represented 0.33% of the whole male population of the district. Two hundred and sixty-one subjects were aged > 75 years. The largest proportion of the treated population was 78 years-old. Eighty patients had been receiving AST for more than 6 years, and during the year 1999 approximately 50% of them were not prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-tested.

Cost-analysis

The yearly treatment cost for prostate cancer per patient was € 3,823.46 as assessed in 1999. In order to reduce costs, three scenarios can be considered: a) with the cheapest AST drug (triptorelin, 11.25 mg), the estimated cost would be € 3,495.09 patient/year, b) with surgical castration, the estimated cost would be lower (€ 2,268.98 patient/year), and finally c) treatment with intermittent AST of patients > 75 years, previously treated with AST for at least 1 year, would cost € 2,525.30 patient/year.

Conclusions

In addition to its reduced toxicity, intermittent AST should be extensively considered for use because of the reduced cost of AST therapy, which would be similar to the cost of surgical castration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Boyle P, Gandini S, Baglietto N, et al. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2001; 39(S4): 2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldemberg SL, Gleave ME, Bruchousky N. The role of intermittent androgen suppression in prostate cancer. AUA Update Series 1999; 18: 18

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouchot O, Lenormand L, Karam G, et al. Intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 543–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Theyer G, Hamilton G. Current status of intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 52; 353–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. WHO Collaborating Center for Drug Statistic Methodology Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo; WHO 2000.

  6. Insirello L, Ballerini L, Brogna F. Gonadoreline di sintesi nel carcinoma prostatico: valutazione comparativa e farmacoeconomica dell’impiego clinico. Giornale Italiano di Farmacia Clinica 2002; 16: 30–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bray F, Sankila R, Ferlay J, Parkin DM. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 99–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyle P, Severi G. Epidemiology of prostate cancer chemoprevention. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 370–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results (SEER) Program. Age-adjusted U.S. cancer death rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89: 12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parkes A, Killer G. Prostate-specific antigen — is it already being used as a screening test? Med J Aust 1994; 161: 722–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ward JE, Hughes A-M, Hirst GHL, Winchester L. Men’s estimates of prostate cancer risk and self-reported rates of screening. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 250–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McCredie M. A rising incidence of prostate cancer in Australia: effect of “screening” or more disease? Cancer Forum 1995; 19: 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCaul K, Luke C, Roder D. Trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in South Australia. Med J Aust 1995; 162: 520–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buserelin Depot, nel carcinoma della prostata. Min Urol & Nefrol 1995; 47: S1

    Google Scholar 

  15. LaRosa JH, LaRosa JC. Enhancing drug compliance in lipid-lowering treatment. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 1169–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, et al. Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications. JAMA 1998; 279:1458–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Andrade SE, Walker AM, Gottlieb LK, et al. Discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs — Do rates reported in clinical trials reflect rates in primary care settings? N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1125–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seidenfeld J, Samson DJ, Hasselblad V, et al. Single-therapy androgen suppression in men with advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 566–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicol DL, Heathcote PS, Kateley GD, Lloyd S. Advanced prostate cancer. The role of high priced hormone therapy. Med J Aust 1993; 159: 16–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonzani RA, Stricker HJ, Peabody JO, Menon M. Cost comparison of orchiectomy and leuprolide in metastatic prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 160: 2446–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chon JK, Jacobs C, Naslund MJ. The cost value of medical versus surgical hormonal therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. J Urol 2000; 164: 735–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bayouni AM, Brown AD, Garber AM. Cost-effectiveness of androgen suppression therapies in advanced prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1731–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariani AJ, Glover M, Arita S. Medical versus surgical androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer: a 10-year longitudinal cost study. J Urol 2001; 165: 104–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grossfeld GD, Small EJ, Carroll PR. Intermittent androgen deprivation for clinically localized prostate cancer: initial experience. Urology 1998;51:137–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Horwich A, Huddart RA, Gadd J, et al. A pilot study of intermittent deprivation in advanced prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 96–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Theyer G, Hamilton G. Current status of intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. Urology 1998; 52: 353–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bouchot O, Lenormand L, Karam G, et al. Intermittent androgen suppression in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 543–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurek R, Renneberg H, Lubben G, et al. Intermittent complete androgen blockade in PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy and incidental prostate cancer. Eur Urol 1999; 35: 27–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Strum SB, Scholz MC, McDermed JE. Intermittent androgen deprivation in prostate cancer patients: factor predictive of prolonged time off therapy. The Oncologist 2000; 5: 45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Da Silva F, Bono A, Whelan P, et al. Phase III study of intermittent MAB versus continuous MAB international cooperative study. J Urol 2001; 165: 292–8

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stekyi-Mensah E, Hart K, Bolton S, Formanh J. Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for recurrent prostate concer. J Urol 2001; 4(S): 169–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Chinellato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salvato, C., Terrazzani, G., Serraglia, D. et al. Analisi delle prescrizioni farmaceutiche e dei costi del trattamento del carcinoma prostatico nell’ULSS 9 di Treviso. Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 5, 35–43 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320602

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320602

Navigation