Skip to main content
Log in

Valutazione economica della resincronizzazione cardiaca nei pazienti affetti da scompenso cardiaco moderato-avanzato

Risultati dello studio BRESCIA (Biventricular RESynchronization: Costs and effectIveness Analysis)

Biventricular resynchronization in heart failure: analysis of hospital costs and clinical effectiveness

  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles

Summary

Objective

Patients with severe heart failure, refractory to drug treatment, can be indicated for biventricular pacing, shown to be useful in overcoming the desynchronization of the ventricular contraction pattern, which generally worsens the hemodynamic conditions of such patients.

This study was aimed at assessing 1) clinical effectiveness of conventional therapy compared with biventricular pacemaker; 2) hospital ward’s budget before and after device implantation.

Methods

The study was carried out according to an observational method, on 30 patients, retrospectively 1-year before implantation and prospectively 1-year afterwards. The economic analysis was designed and carried out in the hospital perspective. End-points were: Ejection fraction, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, no. of hospitalizations in Cardiology Ward and ICU (Intensive Care Unit), Days of hospitalization in Cardiology Ward and ICU, no. of clinic visits (outpatients), no. of day-hospital visits, no. of days free from acute events requiring hospitalization or clinic visits, health care costs.

Results

In the 12 months following biventricular pacing, patients showed: a reduction in functional NYHA class (3.0 ± 0.3 vs 2.1 ± 0.3); a reduction in cardiovascular related hospital stays (from 42.0 ± 37.5 days to 2.8 ± 6.4); an increase in number of days free from acute events (from 104 ± 123 to 266 ± 137). Overall costs decreased from € 383,518 to € 289,890 (with implant costs) and to € 58,549 (without implant costs). In-hospital stays in Cardiology and Coronary Unit decreased by 93% and 95%, respectively.

Conclusions

Biventricular pacing in heart failure patients represents an efficient approach in the hospital perspective and allows a less intensive use of clinical resources. Even if other non-hospital-sustained costs are not taken into consideration, it seems reasonable to deduce that the significant improvement in patient’s clinical condition after implantation will provide a considerable reduction of total costs also in a broader perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Schweiger C, Maggioni AP. Scompenso cardiaco ancora in attesa di strategie. Sole 24ore Sanità. 20–26 novembre 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministero della Salute. Clinical Evidence: una sintesi delle migliori prove di efficacia. Ed. it. Milano; Zadig, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ministero della Salute. Rapporto sulle schede di dimissione ospedaliera (SDO) 2000. www.ministerodellasalute.it

  4. Gavazzi A. La terapia elettrica nello scompenso cardiaco. Ital Heart J 2002; 3 (suppl. 3): 70S–4S

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ricci R, Ansalone G, Toscano S, et al. Cardiac resynchronization: materials, technique and results. The InSync Italian Registry. Eur Heart J 2000; 2 (suppl J): J6–15

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002; 346(24): 1845–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alonso C, Leclercq C, Revault D’allonnes F, et al. Six year experience of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for permanent biventricular pacing in patients with advanced heart failure: technical aspects. Heart 2001; 86: 405–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gras D, Leclercq C, Tang ASL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure: the multicenter InSync clinical study. Eur J Heart Fail 2002; 4: 311–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gasparini M, Curnis A, Daubert JC, et al. Implant feasibility and electrical performance over time of a new left heart side wire lead. Results of a multicenter experience. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (NASPE), 22nd Annual Scientific Sessions, Boston, May 2–5, 2001. (abstr.)

  10. Cazeau S, Leclercq C, Lavergne T, et al. Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 873–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Purerfellner H, Nesser HJ, Winter S, et al. Transvenous left ventricular lead implantation with the EASYTRAK lead system: the European experience. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86 (suppl 1): K157–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kervin WF, Botvinick EH, O’Connel JW, et al. Ventricular contraction abnormalities in dilated cardiomiopathy: effect of biventricular pacing to correct interventricular dyssyncrony. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 121–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Sack S, et al. Chronic benefits as a result of pacing in congestive heart failure: results of the PATHCHF trials. Circulation 2000; 102 (18 suppl. II): abstr. 3352A

  14. Abraham WT. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure: the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE). J Card Fail 2000; 6: 369–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hare JM. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002, Editorial; 346(24): 1902–04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Braunschweig F, Linde C, Gadler F, Rydén L. Reduction of hospital days by biventricular pacing. Eur J Heart Fail 2000; 2: 399–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D.G.R.Lombardia n. VI/38133 del 6 agosto 1998. “Attuazione dell’articolo 12, comma 3 e 4, della L.R. 11.7.1997 n.31. Definizione di requisiti e indicatori per l’accreditamento delle strutture sanitarie”

  18. Apolone G, Brazzi L, Ravizza A, et al. GiViTi — Un gruppo per la terapia intensiva. Torino: Edizioni Minerva Medica, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chinaglia A, Giaschino G, Asteggiano R, et al. Fattibilità ed efficacia di un programma di assistenza integrata tra ospedale e territorio basata su un ambulatorio infermieristico nella gestione dei pazienti con scompenso cardiaco. Risultati clinici a 6 mesi e costi relativi. Ital Heart J 2002; 3 (suppl. 5): 532–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dixon LJ, Thompson G, Harbinson M, et al. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy — a cost effective treatment for cardiac failure. Eur Heart J 2002; 23 (suppl. August): 3 (abstr.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryden-Bergsten T, Andersson F. The health care costs of heart failure in Sweden. J Int Med 1999; 246: 275–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. DRG Guidebook. A comprehensive reference to the DRG classification system. 16th ed. Ingenix Publishing, USA

  23. Leclerq C, Kass DA. Retiming the failing heart: principles and current clinical status of cardiac resynchronization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Caprari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curnis, A., Caprari, F., Mascioli, G. et al. Valutazione economica della resincronizzazione cardiaca nei pazienti affetti da scompenso cardiaco moderato-avanzato. Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 5, 11–22 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320600

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320600

Navigation