Summary
Introduction
In female adults with metastatic breast cancer, the combination of capecitabine plus docetaxel produces more life years and QALYs than docetaxel, but it is still unproved whether this gain is cost-effective. The objective of this study was to find an answer about such issue.
Methods
We used outcome results and resource consumption data from a randomized clinical trial in which two cohorts of patients were treated with capecitabine plus docetaxel (n = 255) or docetaxel (n = 256) for 36 months. The Utility associated to each health state was based on literature estimates. Costs were assessed in 2004 Euros and benefits were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key economic parameters. The analysis was conducted from the hospital perspective.
Results
In patients with metastatic breast cancer, capecitabine plus docetaxel increased life years (LYs) by 0.22 years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.14 years, compared with docetaxel monotherapy. The incremental cost per LY and QALY gained was € 1,743.18 and € 2,736.25, respectively.
Conclusion
This study suggests that, compared with docetaxel monotherapy, capecitabine plus docetaxel is cost-effective for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliografia
Crocetti E, Capocaccia R, Casella C, et al. Gli andamenti temporali della patologia oncologica in Italia: i dati dei registri dei tumori (1986–97). Epidemiol Prev 2004; 28(Suppl. 2): 1–6
Zanetti R, Rosso S, Spitale A, et al. Fatti e cifre dei tumori in Italia. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 2003
http://www.portalemedico.it/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=104
Bonadonna G, Robustelli della Cuna G. Manuale di oncologia medica. Milano: Masson, 1999
O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: Phase III trial results. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(12): 2812–23
Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B, Bonneterre J. A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(5): 504–21
Hutton J, Brown R, Borowitz M, et al. A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 9(Suppl. 2): 8–22
Brown R, Hutton J. Cost-utility model comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs 1998; 9(10): 899–907
Bondonio P, Eandi M. Tempi e costi di lavoro associati al trattamento farmacologico: analisi di alcune opportunità di risparmio. Farmeconomia 1995; 2(3): 36–45
Lucioni C, Mazzi S, Neeser K, et al. Analisi di costo-efficacia della terapia combinata con pioglitazone nel trattamento del diabete mellito di tipo 2 in Italia. Pharmacoeconomics — Italian Research Articles 2004; 6(2): 81–93
Lucioni C, Garancini MP, Massi-Benedetti M, et al. Il costo sociale del diabete di tipo 2 in Italia: lo studio CODE-2. Pharmacoeconomics — Italian Research Articles 2000; 2(1): 1–21
Verma S, Ilersich AL. Population-based pharmacoeconomic model for adopting capecitabine/docetaxel combination treatment for anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist 2003; 8(3): 232–40
O’Shaughnessy JA. Capecitabine and docetaxel in advanced breast cancer: analysis of phase III comparative trial. Oncology (Huntington) 2002; 16 (10 Suppl. 12): 17–22
Wright TL, Twelves CJ. Improved survival in advanced breast cancer with docetaxel and capecitabine in combination: biological synergy or an artefact of trial design? Eur J Cancer 2002; 38(15): 1957–60
Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, et al. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal 1995; 15(3): 369–90
George B, Harris A, Mitchell A. Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia (1991 to 1996). Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19(11): 1103–9
Messori A, Santarlasci B, Trippoli S. Guadagno di sopravvivenza dei nuovi farmaci. Pharmacoeconomics-Italian Research Articles 2004; 6(2): 95–104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I peer reviewers, per questo articolo, sono stati coordinati da Mario Eandi.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravasio, R., Giuliani, G. & Veronesi, A. Costo-efficacia di capecitabina in combinazione con docetaxel versus docetaxel in monoterapia nel trattamento del carcinoma alla mammella metastatico in pazienti pretrattate con antracicline. Pharmacoeconomics-Ital-Res-Articles 7, 59–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320535
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320535