Skip to main content
Log in

New oral CMV prophylactic more cost effective than current standard?

  • Newsletter Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News Weekly

Abstract

T esting and ‘pre-emptive’ therapy with IV ganciclovir for 2 months in the presence of viral shedding is currently the most favourable of 3 ganciclovir-based IV strategies for the management of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients. This is the finding of an economic study that used a model to ascertain the likely value of a new oral drug for such patients before clinical data are available. * At the Third Annual Meeting of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) [ Philadelphia, US; May 1998 ], Dr Josephine Mauskopf from the Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina, US, used this model to show that if a new oral drug with a similar price and efficacy to IV ganciclovir was available, prophylaxis could be more cost effective than either the pre-emptive or the ‘wait-and-treat’ options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Authors

Additional information

* The model was developed in collaboration with researchers from Glaxo Wellcome, US.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Todd, C. New oral CMV prophylactic more cost effective than current standard?. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes News 172, 3–4 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03277670

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03277670

Keywords

Navigation